Page 3 of 4

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 23 Sep 2016, 22:15
by davie
DannyMCR wrote:
thechump wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
Him and Gallagher have also said on more than one occasion that he'd fight Rigo.
If i was quigg i would fight rigo,i think quigg could beat rigo
Under a different trainer, Quigg would give Rigo a run for his money. Under Shameless with his 'tactics' not a snowballs chance in hell.
I think there is a clear level between Quigg and Rigo but that's not why I don't give him a snowball in hells chance.
It's because his style is absolutely custom made to be picked apart by Rigondeaux, I don't see him landing a glove on him. He doesn't have the subtlety, the intelligence or the ability to adapt, he'd load up and get countered all night and I could see him actually getting frustrated to the point where he started bombing away and getting stopped by him. Quigg's not a bad boxer but he's just not at the level of ability to cause Rigo harm. A body shot is the only chance I give him and even then I'm rating this one in the 95/5 region.

Frampton would have been an underdog against Rigo but his skillset and busy style would have caused him far more problems IMO.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 02:30
by Andrew
BigDoofus wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:What calibre of opponent does everyone think his team will opt for.

He has said on more than one occasion he doesn't want any warm up fights.
Him and Gallagher have also said on more than one occasion that he'd fight Rigo.
Talk is cheap.

More chance of a full Beatles reunion than Gallagher letting that fight happen.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 02:35
by Andrew
davie wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:
thechump wrote: If i was quigg i would fight rigo,i think quigg could beat rigo
Under a different trainer, Quigg would give Rigo a run for his money. Under Shameless with his 'tactics' not a snowballs chance in hell.
I think there is a clear level between Quigg and Rigo but that's not why I don't give him a snowball in hells chance.
It's because his style is absolutely custom made to be picked apart by Rigondeaux, I don't see him landing a glove on him. He doesn't have the subtlety, the intelligence or the ability to adapt, he'd load up and get countered all night and I could see him actually getting frustrated to the point where he started bombing away and getting stopped by him. Quigg's not a bad boxer but he's just not at the level of ability to cause Rigo harm. A body shot is the only chance I give him and even then I'm rating this one in the 95/5 region.

Frampton would have been an underdog against Rigo but his skillset and busy style would have caused him far more problems IMO.
I do think Rigo is going to be there for the taking soon and a fighter can massively benefit from it.

It would be perfect for Quigg to take it right now the thing is h has the exact blueprint of how NOT to fight Rigo and that is the first 8 rounds of the Frampton fight.

If he changes trainer and fought like he did round 8 of that fight from the start against Rigo he would have a very slim chance of winning but higher risk of getting KOd.

If he fought like he did v Frampton in the first 8 rounds you would witness the biggest boxing lesson ever on British soil.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 06:05
by Horse
davie wrote:He was effing magnificent in that fight Horse.
Sometimes fighters don't look great and sometimes great fighters make very good fighters look ordinary

The movement and counter punching, against one of the most effective offensive fighters in the game, was to be marveled at.
I watched a review of the fight, one of these YouTube blokes that slows down the replays so you can watch the technical brilliance of all the things you don't see at full speed.
Donaire was losing pretty clearly to Darchinyan in his next fight and looking terrible and soon after he was destroyed by Walters.

Rigondeaux's performance against Donaire is perhaps the most overrated performance in the last 5 years of boxing.
davie wrote:There's a point where Rigo is circling and he crosses his feet to fool Donaire, Donaire throws a big over hand right as Rigo changes direction. By the time Donaire gets the punch where it was supposed to be Rigo is 6 feet away from it. It's truly masterful boxing, if you can't appreciate what Rigo does in the ring you just don't get it bud.
And he didn't counter?

Even when you give an example of Rigondeaux's 'brilliance' he seems to be doing the wrong thing.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 12:05
by ElJefe
davie wrote:
Horse wrote:
ElJefe wrote:Yes he is.
Based on what?

His win against a lacklustre Donaire is almost 3.5 years ago now.

Very overrated fighter.
He was effing magnificent in that fight Horse.
Sometimes fighters don't look great and sometimes great fighters make very good fighters look ordinary

The movement and counter punching, against one of the most effective offensive fighters in the game, was to be marveled at.
I watched a review of the fight, one of these YouTube blokes that slows down the replays so you can watch the technical brilliance of all the things you don't see at full speed. There's a point where Rigo is circling and he crosses his feet to fool Donaire, Donaire throws a big over hand right as Rigo changes direction. By the time Donaire gets the punch where it was supposed to be Rigo is 6 feet away from it. It's truly masterful boxing, if you can't appreciate what Rigo does in the ring you just don't get it bud.
Any idea how I can find that mate? Wouldn't mind giving it a watch.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:44
by davie
ElJefe wrote:
davie wrote:
Horse wrote:Based on what?

His win against a lacklustre Donaire is almost 3.5 years ago now.

Very overrated fighter.
He was effing magnificent in that fight Horse.
Sometimes fighters don't look great and sometimes great fighters make very good fighters look ordinary

The movement and counter punching, against one of the most effective offensive fighters in the game, was to be marveled at.
I watched a review of the fight, one of these YouTube blokes that slows down the replays so you can watch the technical brilliance of all the things you don't see at full speed. There's a point where Rigo is circling and he crosses his feet to fool Donaire, Donaire throws a big over hand right as Rigo changes direction. By the time Donaire gets the punch where it was supposed to be Rigo is 6 feet away from it. It's truly masterful boxing, if you can't appreciate what Rigo does in the ring you just don't get it bud.
Any idea how I can find that mate? Wouldn't mind giving it a watch.

There's a lot of good ones on youtube. There's a lad Lee Wylie has a channel on youtube, his videos are really good.
He has a Rigo tribute but I don't think it's that one I'm thinking of. It might not even have been on Youtube but someone posted the link on the CS a couple years back

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:47
by tobyh5
Horse wrote:I know better than most.

Rigo is a definite hypejob.

Stunning arrogance. What a disgusting little man you really are. If you could change mummies bedding before replying though please, you know how upset she gets

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:49
by davie
tobyh5 wrote:
Horse wrote:I know better than most.

Rigo is a definite hypejob.

Stunning arrogance. What a disgusting little man you really are. If you could change mummies bedding before replying though please, you know how upset she gets
He really is something

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:50
by davie
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:He was effing magnificent in that fight Horse.
Sometimes fighters don't look great and sometimes great fighters make very good fighters look ordinary

The movement and counter punching, against one of the most effective offensive fighters in the game, was to be marveled at.
I watched a review of the fight, one of these YouTube blokes that slows down the replays so you can watch the technical brilliance of all the things you don't see at full speed.
Donaire was losing pretty clearly to Darchinyan in his next fight and looking terrible and soon after he was destroyed by Walters.

Rigondeaux's performance against Donaire is perhaps the most overrated performance in the last 5 years of boxing.
davie wrote:There's a point where Rigo is circling and he crosses his feet to fool Donaire, Donaire throws a big over hand right as Rigo changes direction. By the time Donaire gets the punch where it was supposed to be Rigo is 6 feet away from it. It's truly masterful boxing, if you can't appreciate what Rigo does in the ring you just don't get it bud.
And he didn't counter?

Even when you give an example of Rigondeaux's 'brilliance' he seems to be doing the wrong thing.
We'll have to agree to disagree Horse, you must see something different to me.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:52
by Horse
davie wrote:He really is something
Because I don't rate that Rigondeaux hypejob?

:roll:

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:52
by davie
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:He really is something
Because I don't rate that Rigondeaux hypejob?

:roll:
No because you think you know better than most

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:54
by Horse
davie wrote:No because you think you know better than most
I do.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 13:55
by davie
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:No because you think you know better than most
I do.
Exactly the response I expected

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 14:06
by Horse
davie wrote:Exactly the response I expected
Predictable, but true.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 24 Sep 2016, 14:24
by davie
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Exactly the response I expected
Predictable, but true.
Ach, the place wouldn't be the same without you

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 12:58
by rhino222
feed quigg to kid galahad!

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 13:08
by Stevieb8006
rhino222 wrote:feed quigg to kid galahad!
I'd like to see that. I've a sneaky feeling Galahads a front runner that won't like it back. Thought jazz a dickens made him uncomfortable a few times.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 14:31
by Counter-puncher
Stevieb8006 wrote:
rhino222 wrote:feed quigg to kid galahad!
I'd like to see that. I've a sneaky feeling Galahads a front runner that won't like it back. Thought jazz a dickens made him uncomfortable a few times.
Dickens did maybe make him look uncomfortable, but he did it with a high-tempo strategy with a lot of foot movement, and he couldn't sustain the energy levels to do it throughout the fight.

Quiggs slow plodding feet, if he were to try and press Galahad, wouldn't be able to do it in the same way, I think he would spend quite a while in the trademark Joe G 'lose the early rounds and come on strong' posture and Galahad would have plenty of opportunities to find angles through his guard.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 15:03
by Stevieb8006
Counter-puncher wrote:
Stevieb8006 wrote:
rhino222 wrote:feed quigg to kid galahad!
I'd like to see that. I've a sneaky feeling Galahads a front runner that won't like it back. Thought jazz a dickens made him uncomfortable a few times.
Dickens did maybe make him look uncomfortable, but he did it with a high-tempo strategy with a lot of foot movement, and he couldn't sustain the energy levels to do it throughout the fight.

Quiggs slow plodding feet, if he were to try and press Galahad, wouldn't be able to do it in the same way, I think he would spend quite a while in the trademark Joe G 'lose the early rounds and come on strong' posture and Galahad would have plenty of opportunities to find angles through his guard.
Maybe. Its def one we all deserve to see. Quigg could well be too strong. He was putting it on frampton so I see no reason he couldn't find Galahad. He's not THAT elusive.hope its in the pipeline, they are almost complete opposites personality wise

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 15:07
by Fitzy901
I cant believe we are really having this discussion on this forum, are people really making a case for the drug cheat who was losing to Dickens and got dropped by an over the hill Jason Booth a chance of beating Rigondeux.

Dear oh deary me

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 15:18
by rossij8
Fitzy901 wrote:I cant believe we are really having this discussion on this forum, are people really making a case for the drug cheat who was losing to Dickens and got dropped by an over the hill Jason Booth a chance of beating Rigondeux.

Dear oh deary me
He found a way against Dickens - great fighters always do, and most have blips along the way up

From what I saw of him, he looks like he could be the real deal

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 25 Sep 2016, 15:21
by rd350lc
davie wrote:
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Exactly the response I expected
Predictable, but true.
Ach, the place wouldn't be the same without you
Can't believe you lads take the bait so easily .

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 26 Sep 2016, 01:50
by Andrew
Stevieb8006 wrote:
rhino222 wrote:feed quigg to kid galahad!
I'd like to see that. I've a sneaky feeling Galahads a front runner that won't like it back. Thought jazz a dickens made him uncomfortable a few times.
I would love Quigg to blast out that drugs cheat.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 06 Oct 2016, 17:39
by Fitzy901
No way he's boxing anyone with a pulse now lol.

Re: Scott Quigg

Posted: 06 Oct 2016, 18:45
by DannyMCR
Fitzy901 wrote:No way he's boxing anyone with a pulse now lol.
It's a shame because he couldn't even headline the arena on his own if Joshua ends up being moved to December