Page 3 of 3
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 22 Oct 2016, 20:45
by asdfjkl
Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:
If Joshua fights Price next he has no business anywhere near the top 5.
Then what top 5 has and why?
There are at least 5 heavyweights with better wins than Joshua. I won't bother naming them as you'll try and refusely deny it as you always do. I like Joshua but fighting Price as a second defence of your world title is disgraceful. The guy isn't even top 40. Fight a Pulev and get the win then he's top 5.
Oh I admit AJ doesn't have the most impressive names on his list yet. But he clearly dominated all of his opponents in such a way that it's safe to say he's probably the best heavyweight boxer out there.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 04:53
by Killer Blow
asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Then what top 5 has and why?
There are at least 5 heavyweights with better wins than Joshua. I won't bother naming them as you'll try and refusely deny it as you always do. I like Joshua but fighting Price as a second defence of your world title is disgraceful. The guy isn't even top 40. Fight a Pulev and get the win then he's top 5.
Oh I admit AJ doesn't have the most impressive names on his list yet. But he clearly dominated all of his opponents in such a way that it's safe to say he's probably the best heavyweight boxer out there.
No he hasn't. He's still not top 5.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 10:46
by asdfjkl
Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:
There are at least 5 heavyweights with better wins than Joshua. I won't bother naming them as you'll try and refusely deny it as you always do. I like Joshua but fighting Price as a second defence of your world title is disgraceful. The guy isn't even top 40. Fight a Pulev and get the win then he's top 5.
Oh I admit AJ doesn't have the most impressive names on his list yet. But he clearly dominated all of his opponents in such a way that it's safe to say he's probably the best heavyweight boxer out there.
No he hasn't. He's still not top 5.
Top 3 according to boxrec atm (even though Fury is removed here).
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 11:21
by BitPlayer
asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Oh I admit AJ doesn't have the most impressive names on his list yet. But he clearly dominated all of his opponents in such a way that it's safe to say he's probably the best heavyweight boxer out there.
No he hasn't. He's still not top 5.
Top 3 according to boxrec atm (even though Fury is removed here).
So saying he's top 3 on Boxrec is enough to make him No. 1
On Boxrec, without Fury, Wlad is No.1 again and it's not even close.
Plus without Martin and Breazeale, both of which had inflated rankings, he didn't even have as many points as Chisora currently has.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 11:25
by Killer Blow
asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Oh I admit AJ doesn't have the most impressive names on his list yet. But he clearly dominated all of his opponents in such a way that it's safe to say he's probably the best heavyweight boxer out there.
No he hasn't. He's still not top 5.
Top 3 according to boxrec atm (even though Fury is removed here).
Malik Scott is 8 with boxrec. Big whoop.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 11:56
by asdfjkl
Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:
No he hasn't. He's still not top 5.
Top 3 according to boxrec atm (even though Fury is removed here).
Malik Scott is 8 with boxrec. Big whoop.
Admitted, I recently even wrote the rank 10-20 are less good as the rank 20-30 in the heavyweights. I still think AJ is the best heavyweight out there atm.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 12:05
by Killer Blow
asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Top 3 according to boxrec atm (even though Fury is removed here).
Malik Scott is 8 with boxrec. Big whoop.
Admitted, I recently even wrote the rank 10-20 are less good as the rank 20-30 in the heavyweights. I still think AJ is the best heavyweight out there atm.
To prove you're the best you have to beat the best. He hasn't done that yet.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 12:16
by BitPlayer
Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:
Malik Scott is 8 with boxrec. Big whoop.
Admitted, I recently even wrote the rank 10-20 are less good as the rank 20-30 in the heavyweights. I still think AJ is the best heavyweight out there atm.
To prove you're the best you have to beat the best. He hasn't done that yet.
Or atleast take on some solid opponents, Joshua is yet to fight anyone above domestic or NABO level.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 16:29
by asdfjkl
BitPlayer wrote:Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Admitted, I recently even wrote the rank 10-20 are less good as the rank 20-30 in the heavyweights. I still think AJ is the best heavyweight out there atm.
To prove you're the best you have to beat the best. He hasn't done that yet.
Or atleast take on some solid opponents, Joshua is yet to fight anyone above domestic or NABO level.
He wants Klitschko, but if Klitschko preferes to duck him, then AJ doesn't have much of a choice...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 17:06
by Killer Blow
asdfjkl wrote:BitPlayer wrote:Killer Blow wrote:
To prove you're the best you have to beat the best. He hasn't done that yet.
Or atleast take on some solid opponents, Joshua is yet to fight anyone above domestic or NABO level.
He wants Klitschko, but if Klitschko preferes to duck him, then AJ doesn't have much of a choice...
He has the choice to fight someone in the top 40...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 23 Oct 2016, 23:05
by asdfjkl
Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:BitPlayer wrote:
Or atleast take on some solid opponents, Joshua is yet to fight anyone above domestic or NABO level.
He wants Klitschko, but if Klitschko preferes to duck him, then AJ doesn't have much of a choice...
He has the choice to fight someone in the top 40...
Like Martin, Whyte and Breazeale?
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 24 Oct 2016, 05:02
by Killer Blow
asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
He wants Klitschko, but if Klitschko preferes to duck him, then AJ doesn't have much of a choice...
He has the choice to fight someone in the top 40...
Like Martin, Whyte and Breazeale?
Price is a step down from those guys.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 24 Oct 2016, 07:54
by asdfjkl
Killer Blow wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Killer Blow wrote:
He has the choice to fight someone in the top 40...
Like Martin, Whyte and Breazeale?
Price is a step down from those guys.
True, I really wouldn't like it if he fights Price right now, but if most others avoid him, like Klitschko, he doesn't have much of a choice left does he? When Wilder fought Szpilka, Szpilka was pretty much the highest ranked availeble.