Chisora-Whyte

Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Rob3_142 »

BitPlayer wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:Last IFL video I saw with Chisora, he was saying he doesn't think it'll happen. He was suggesting that Hearn needs to pay him big. I don't know how competitive in the grand scheme of things that the money would be, or is Chisora just ducking?
Probably based off the fact that he wouldn't give Chisora enough against Joshua.
Yeah but he went and took less money against Pulev. Thought he was motivated by money?
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by BitPlayer »

Rob3_142 wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:Last IFL video I saw with Chisora, he was saying he doesn't think it'll happen. He was suggesting that Hearn needs to pay him big. I don't know how competitive in the grand scheme of things that the money would be, or is Chisora just ducking?
Probably based off the fact that he wouldn't give Chisora enough against Joshua.
Yeah but he went and took less money against Pulev. Thought he was motivated by money?
If Chisroa beat Pulev he would've gotten a lot more credit than if he'd beaten Joshua, that'd've made it worthwhile.

Plus they were with the same promoter, and I think Chisora is no longer with him.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by keithmoonhangover »

BitPlayer wrote:If Chisroa beat Pulev he would've gotten a lot more credit than if he'd beaten Joshua,
How so?
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Rob3_142 »

BitPlayer wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: Probably based off the fact that he wouldn't give Chisora enough against Joshua.
Yeah but he went and took less money against Pulev. Thought he was motivated by money?
If Chisroa beat Pulev he would've gotten a lot more credit than if he'd beaten Joshua, that'd've made it worthwhile.

Plus they were with the same promoter, and I think Chisora is no longer with him.
I don't think it would have earned him much respect. It might have earned him a shot at a world title, which had he won that, may have earned him respect. However, I still think earning money is his priority over respect/titles.

There is no logic over ducking the Joshua fight. Unless he thought a heavy knockout would essentially finish his career.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by BitPlayer »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:If Chisroa beat Pulev he would've gotten a lot more credit than if he'd beaten Joshua,
How so?
Beceause if Chisora beat Joshua, people would just say he got exposed and give Chisora very little credit.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by keithmoonhangover »

BitPlayer wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:If Chisroa beat Pulev he would've gotten a lot more credit than if he'd beaten Joshua,
How so?
Beceause if Chisora beat Joshua, people would just say he got exposed and give Chisora very little credit.
Nonsense.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Rob3_142 »

Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Rob3_142 »

jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

BitPlayer wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:If Chisroa beat Pulev he would've gotten a lot more credit than if he'd beaten Joshua,
How so?
Beceause if Chisora beat Joshua, people would just say he got exposed and give Chisora very little credit.
Rubbish, of course he'd get credit.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Is it just me or has Whyte got a TINY head?

Should make it harder for Delboy to land flush.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Is it just me or has Whyte got a TINY head?

Should make it harder for Delboy to land flush.
I have a MASSIVE napa. :OhYes: Easy to hit. :cry: Although, my head but is formidable. :brick:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Is it just me or has Whyte got a TINY head?

Should make it harder for Delboy to land flush.
I have a MASSIVE napa. :OhYes: Easy to hit. :cry: Although, my head but is formidable. :brick:

You'd have some way to go to beat the following list;

Sam allardyce
Glenn McCrory
Gary Mason
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Taansend »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Is it just me or has Whyte got a TINY head?

Should make it harder for Delboy to land flush.
I have a MASSIVE napa. :OhYes: Easy to hit. :cry: Although, my head but is formidable. :brick:

You'd have some way to go to beat the following list;

Sam allardyce
Glenn McCrory
Gary Mason
Charlie Sheen
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Taansend wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
I have a MASSIVE napa. :OhYes: Easy to hit. :cry: Although, my head but is formidable. :brick:

You'd have some way to go to beat the following list;

Sam allardyce
Glenn McCrory
Gary Mason
Charlie Sheen
Literal or metaphorically speaking. No way is his noggin on the same plane of existence physically as those guys.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Is it just me or has Whyte got a TINY head?

Should make it harder for Delboy to land flush.
I have a MASSIVE napa. :OhYes: Easy to hit. :cry: Although, my head but is formidable. :brick:

You'd have some way to go to beat the following list;

Sam allardyce
Glenn McCrory
Gary Mason
I've met all three. Sam's is comparable.
Glenn threatened me once in a nightclub. My head is bigger.
Gary Mason was an absolute gent who went clubbing in Sunderland a canny bit in the early 90's. Tiny head compared to mine.
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by boxingknockout »

I have seen Frampton on a number of occasions.... and for a small man his loaf is ENORMOUS!

Not sure it's as big as Jake Lamotta's (P4P huge heed)
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Taansend »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Taansend wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:

You'd have some way to go to beat the following list;

Sam allardyce
Glenn McCrory
Gary Mason
Charlie Sheen
Literal or metaphorically speaking. No way is his noggin on the same plane of existence physically as those guys.
Charlie's head is HUGE
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Taansend wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Taansend wrote:
Charlie Sheen
Literal or metaphorically speaking. No way is his noggin on the same plane of existence physically as those guys.
Charlie's head is HUGE

Compared to his fairly diminuitive body.

If you're head is bigger than those chaps, then you need to see a doctor, you may have a life threatening case of macrocephaly, or elephantitis of the brain.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by Taansend »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Taansend wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Literal or metaphorically speaking. No way is his noggin on the same plane of existence physically as those guys.
Charlie's head is HUGE

Compared to his fairly diminuitive body.

If you're head is bigger than those chaps, then you need to see a doctor, you may have a life threatening case of macrocephaly, or elephantitis of the brain.
But Keith Moon says Masons head was tiny.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Taansend wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Taansend wrote:
Charlie's head is HUGE

Compared to his fairly diminuitive body.

If you're head is bigger than those chaps, then you need to see a doctor, you may have a life threatening case of macrocephaly, or elephantitis of the brain.
But Keith Moon says Masons head was tiny.
What?!! Compared to what - the known universe?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Taansend wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Compared to his fairly diminuitive body.

If you're head is bigger than those chaps, then you need to see a doctor, you may have a life threatening case of macrocephaly, or elephantitis of the brain.
But Keith Moon says Masons head was tiny.
What?!! Compared to what - the known universe?
Compared to my substantial napa. I have a majasive heed. I'm 6' 5", so everything is in proportion, including little Keith. :OhYes:
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by JC »

Always thought Iran Barkley had a massive head as did Bennie Briscoe
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

J-C wrote:Always thought Iran Barkley had a massive head as did Bennie Briscoe
Yeah, right old bowling ball on him.
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Chisora-Whyte

Post by TopGun »

Killer Blow wrote:Chisora in his prime would win this. However, he looks shot now. His stamina was terrible against Pulev, he looked gased after 2 rounds. He came in shape for that fight as well. Dillian on the other hand is in the best shape of his life. For that reason alone I'm very confident Dillian wins, most likely by late stoppage. Not because he's the better fighter, but because his conditioning looks far superior at this moment in time.

Good comment. Chisora of old would win this but he is just in it for the cash now and does not look very good at all. David Haye was the nail in Chisora's coffin. Whyte will be too motivated for this to lose. I wonder if Chisora will even get off the couch for a pad session. This might even be his last fight?
Post Reply