Page 3 of 4

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 27 Oct 2016, 09:32
by Ian1973
David Price definitely and Amir Khan.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 27 Oct 2016, 12:46
by ValMar
greg wrote:..I actually think that if they drop you easily - that's your "chin"...if you can't get up, that's your "balls"
:TU:

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 06:30
by man
greg wrote:..I actually think that if they drop you easily - that's your "chin"...if you can't get up, that's your "balls"
i don't see it like that.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 06:37
by lillywhite14
Ian1973 wrote:David Price definitely and Amir Khan.
Price fulfills one half of the description. 'Excellent' he really is not.

Khan, bang on. Has blinding speed and is talented but of course, very chinny.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 08:52
by lefty
lillywhite14 wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:David Price definitely and Amir Khan.
Price fulfills one half of the description. 'Excellent' he really is not.

Khan, bang on. Has blinding speed and is talented but of course, very chinny.
I don't think Khan is that chinny; however he has no boxing IQ- he's super fast but defensively wide open quite often. He has improved in that area somewhat however.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 09:41
by Badhusker
ValMar wrote:I will try to make a proper list of excellent fighters with the soft chin :

1. Rigondeaux
2. Khan
3. Fury
4. W. Klitschko
5. Pacquiao

What do you think about my list ? Do you agree ?
First of all, getting knocked down in a fight does not mean you are chinny. In a lot of cases even getting KO'd doesn't automatically mean you are chinny either. Of those on your list, Rigo and Fury have not been KO'd. Imo, the only one on your list that deserves that title of being chinny is Khan.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 11:40
by Boxerbeetle
lefty wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:David Price definitely and Amir Khan.
Price fulfills one half of the description. 'Excellent' he really is not.

Khan, bang on. Has blinding speed and is talented but of course, very chinny.
I don't think Khan is that chinny; however he has no boxing IQ- he's super fast but defensively wide open quite often. He has improved in that area somewhat however.
Sorry mate, but if Khan isn't chinny then I really don't know who is.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 12:03
by Syntax Error
Ian1973 wrote:David Price definitely and Amir Khan.
David Price; definitely not.

He is chinny & that's where it ends.

Amir Khan is spot on.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 13:37
by IRLangmaid25
punchoutsb wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote: Wlad is definitely chinny. His entire style was changed by Steward with the specific intention of never allowing his chin to be checked again. Stamina had little to do with it.
I disagree. He was never out cold in his career, and the only fight where his chin 100% let him down was Sanders. Again, look at his body of work. Wlad will never be remembered for an iron jaw, but anyone who objectively looks at his career will see that the weak chinned Wlad never really existed.
Which I have and yes he got put down 11 times in his career and stopped three times. But he was only dropped by blokes who could seriously bang.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 16:29
by ValMar
Boxerbeetle wrote:
lefty wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:
Price fulfills one half of the description. 'Excellent' he really is not.

Khan, bang on. Has blinding speed and is talented but of course, very chinny.
I don't think Khan is that chinny; however he has no boxing IQ- he's super fast but defensively wide open quite often. He has improved in that area somewhat however.
Sorry mate, but if Khan isn't chinny then I really don't know who is.
Yes ! :TU:

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 16:48
by lefty
Boxerbeetle wrote:
lefty wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:
Price fulfills one half of the description. 'Excellent' he really is not.

Khan, bang on. Has blinding speed and is talented but of course, very chinny.
I don't think Khan is that chinny; however he has no boxing IQ- he's super fast but defensively wide open quite often. He has improved in that area somewhat however.
Sorry mate, but if Khan isn't chinny then I really don't know who is.
I'm not saying he isn't chinny. I'm saying I don't think hes as chinny as his reputation suggests. Malik scott is far worse in that department I think.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 16:52
by crusader
The jab that Prescott rocked him with would've hurt anyone.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 16:56
by Boxerbeetle
crusader wrote:The jab that Prescott rocked him with would've hurt anyone.
:lol:

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 18:13
by BitPlayer
greg wrote:..I actually think that if they drop you easily - that's your "chin"...if you can't get up, that's your "balls"
So if you're balance is completely gone, you just don't have the balls to get up? :doh:

Fighters very often try like hell to get up and often manage but still get stopped.

Or what about if you are completely out for the count?

Does that mean yu don't have the balls either? :brick:

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 30 Oct 2016, 19:12
by Counter-puncher
Boxerbeetle wrote:
crusader wrote:The jab that Prescott rocked him with would've hurt anyone.
:lol:
Hes right. That was a picture perfect jab which he pushed hard off the back foot and timed perfectly clean through the point of the chin. I've seen plenty of fighters with a better chin than Khan's get hurt with jabs when they land that perfectly.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 12:09
by IKSRTFO
greg wrote:..I actually think that if they drop you easily - that's your "chin"...if you can't get up, that's your "balls"

Disagree because that would make Marquez chinny when he's never been stopped. I think you also have to take in account how hard was the puncher who dropped/stopped them. Tyson was stopped in nearly all of his losses but I would never say he was chinny.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 13:06
by jamesmcdonnell
ValMar wrote:I will try to make a proper list of excellent fighters with the soft chin :

1. Rigondeaux
2. Khan
3. Fury
4. W. Klitschko
5. Pacquiao

What do you think about my list ? Do you agree ?
Pacquaio!!! Really, what because he was stopped once by Marquez? all of his other losses by stoppage earlier in his career were from fatigue, mainly due to making ridiculous weights.

Nothing wrong with Pacquaio's chin at all.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 14:00
by ValMar
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
ValMar wrote:I will try to make a proper list of excellent fighters with the soft chin :

1. Rigondeaux
2. Khan
3. Fury
4. W. Klitschko
5. Pacquiao

What do you think about my list ? Do you agree ?
Pacquaio!!! Really, what because he was stopped once by Marquez? all of his other losses by stoppage earlier in his career were from fatigue, mainly due to making ridiculous weights.

Nothing wrong with Pacquaio's chin at all.
I have to repeat. I put Pac on this list because I thought (for a moment) he had been dead. Literally, I thought so, when Marquez KO'd him.........

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 14:52
by IKSRTFO
ValMar wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
ValMar wrote:I will try to make a proper list of excellent fighters with the soft chin :

1. Rigondeaux
2. Khan
3. Fury
4. W. Klitschko
5. Pacquiao

What do you think about my list ? Do you agree ?
Pacquaio!!! Really, what because he was stopped once by Marquez? all of his other losses by stoppage earlier in his career were from fatigue, mainly due to making ridiculous weights.

Nothing wrong with Pacquaio's chin at all.
I have to repeat. I put Pac on this list because I thought (for a moment) he had been dead. Literally, I thought so, when Marquez KO'd him.........

That still doesn't make him chinny. Paul Williams even after the Martinez KO isn't chinny. Just ask Margarito.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 15:27
by ValMar
IKSRTFO wrote:
ValMar wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Pacquaio!!! Really, what because he was stopped once by Marquez? all of his other losses by stoppage earlier in his career were from fatigue, mainly due to making ridiculous weights.

Nothing wrong with Pacquaio's chin at all.
I have to repeat. I put Pac on this list because I thought (for a moment) he had been dead. Literally, I thought so, when Marquez KO'd him.........

That still doesn't make him chinny. Paul Williams even after the Martinez KO isn't chinny. Just ask Margarito.
Perhaps, you are right, but I, simply, can not forget Pac on canvas, without any signs of life.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 31 Oct 2016, 23:25
by Tanzio
Gamboa

JMM

JuanMa

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 01 Nov 2016, 13:25
by ValMar
Tanzio wrote:Gamboa

JMM

JuanMa

Is Gamboa active ? He was nearly excellent, and partly chinny.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 02 Nov 2016, 10:05
by hurricanemitch14
boxing_rocks wrote:Ward
Ward was hurt against Boone at 160....Ward moved up to 168 where he hasn't been hurt once. Troll dude.

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 02 Nov 2016, 10:26
by JoeCorrao
Thomas Hearns

Re: Excellent, but chinny

Posted: 03 Nov 2016, 13:03
by ValMar
hurricanemitch14 wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:Ward
Ward was hurt against Boone at 160....Ward moved up to 168 where he hasn't been hurt once. Troll dude.
No...Ward has a decent chin, we will know more about that...Very soon...........