BoxRec

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:

fizzjambo wrote:
500k - you have no idea what you are on about!

Haye will have been lucky to clear that. Briggs got publicity and maybe just six figures at a push but I doubt it. £50k I'd say tbh

Haye earnt 1m. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/da ... ay-8024626

Briggs would have done well to get 10% of that.

I'd say 50k is a good guess. Why would anybody pay him more?

Mate come on. You really think he would take the fight for 50k.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:

Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.

Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.

the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.

Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.

Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.

There is a reason the "Hayeday" undercards were so underwhelming. Haye's unlikely to be throwing six figures at supporting bouts, if it would impact on his take-home.

Killer Blow wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:
Haye earnt 1m. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/da ... ay-8024626

Briggs would have done well to get 10% of that.

I'd say 50k is a good guess. Why would anybody pay him more?

Mate come on. You really think he would take the fight for 50k.

He took the fight for free, just the promise that Haye would fight him next. Both accepted but at the end lier/coward Haye realised Briggs was too good and refused to face him anyway.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:

Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.

Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.

the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.

Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.

How can I proof he didn't receive a penny? He didn't, he really didn't, exactly like he stated. If he did, it could probably easely been proven, but he didn't. If he didn't, then how could that possibly be proven?
I can't proof I never kissed your mum either, I haven't, I really haven't, but how can I possibly proof that?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.

Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.

the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.

Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.

Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.

I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.

Killer Blow wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.

I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.

Did you or did you not post this?

Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.

I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.

Did you or did you not post this?

Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.

7 figures!? Really? For a fight of a 44 year old man who's not well known in the U.K. against a nonentity With no chance?

Oh maybe you meant Zimbabwean dollars

keithmoonhangover wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:I repeat, Briggs never received a penny, David Haye took all the money to himself.

What a load of tosh.

The thing is, when someone is this deluded it's a waste of time discussing anything. I've had several Briggs related back and forths with him. At the end of the day why bother? I've nowt against Briggs and I know the world if full of delusional eejits who cannae back down on a point so what's in it for me? We all know Briggs will put up a 'watch through the hands' type performance if he takes a meaningful fight at this stage in his advanced life. I hope he doesn't for his own health but it'll hardly be boxing first, or last, car crash

Killer Blow wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.

Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.

Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.

I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.

Your posts in this thread seem to be a determined effort to prove otherwise. You'rd only fortunate that a proper wako is posting even more impressive filth

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.

I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.

Did you or did you not post this?

Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.

By nearly I meant half a million. I don't post blind nonsense like Jekyll does.

How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.

asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.

I'll admit it, you present a solid, thoughtful, rational arguement. Now that you have my full attention I'd be intrigued if you could provide your views on the following:

*The twin towers collapse

*The Philadelphia experiment

*Nessie

*Creationism

I look forward to your enlightening views on the above

Killer Blow wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Killer Blow wrote:
I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.

Did you or did you not post this?

Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.

By nearly I meant half a million. I don't post blind nonsense like Jekyll does.

That's not nearly. That's half.

asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.

Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.

Fighting bellews in February.

I personally can't wait..

Eddie confirmed it in an interview with Kugan..

Super fight

keithmoonhangover wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.

Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.

Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,

asdfjkl wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.

Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.

Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,

I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.

OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.

Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,

I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.

OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?

I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiot

fizzjambo wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,

I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.

OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?

I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiot

You win mate.

asdfjkl wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:I repeat, Briggs never received a penny, David Haye took all the money to himself.

Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.

Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.

Show us YOUR proof.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

fizzjambo wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.

OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?

I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiot

You win mate.

https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.

asdfjkl wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

fizzjambo wrote:
I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiot

You win mate.

https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.

The BBBofC would be investigating Haye if he really didn't get paid. Nonsense.

asdfjkl wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

fizzjambo wrote:
I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiot

You win mate.

https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.

Briggs will say and do anything to get a big money fight, he's a social media junky whose only mission is to get one last big pay cheque. Just because he tweeted it doesn't make it true.

Controversial wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
You win mate.

https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.

Briggs will say and do anything to get a big money fight, he's a social media junky whose only mission is to get one last big pay cheque. Just because he tweeted it doesn't make it true.

If there is/was a contract in place that forced Haye to fight Briggs one of two things would have happened;
1. Haye fights Briggs
2. Briggs sues Haye for loss of earnings (presumably six figures at least) due to breach of contract.

Come on, think about it, if there was a legally binding contract in place and Haye just ignored it, costing Briggs a massive pay day, you think all he'd do is moan in Twitter? He's American, those guys love a lawsuit!