Re: Is Carl Frampton obliged to give Scott Quigg a rematch?
Posted: 01 Nov 2016, 21:33
I wouldn't think so.Horse wrote:Yeah, the WBA & IBF super bantamweight titles.
I wouldn't think so.Horse wrote:Yeah, the WBA & IBF super bantamweight titles.
Well to be fair to him, he did have a broken jaw. I think there is a little bit of leeway of not stepping right back into the ring.Crease wrote:Since their fight Frampton has moved up a division & tested himself against a P4P top fighter, won the fight fairly & is now going to be headlining at the MGM Grand in a massive money spinner.
Quigg has done NOTHING - literally.
Quigg would be doing well by setting more realistic targets for himself. For example - if he fought Nonito Donaire or Abner Mares and won them fights, he would be well on his way of regaining credibility.
He really doesn't have a clue!rio wrote:Quigg has never been champion, blew his change getting outclassed in the process. Must have been tough for you seeing that! Never said Frampton was the undisputed champion of any division but he was a champion in 2 of them which is something quigg couple never say. With your logic was froch not a world champion either? You really don't have a clue do youHorse wrote:He's never been the true champion of any division.rio wrote:So Frampton never beat kiko or Santa Cruz to win his belt? That's strange as that how I remember it
If you're going to bang on about Quigg never having been a world champion then let's get it right about Frampton as well.