Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Brook v Spence

Brook KO
10
17%
Brook points
23
38%
Spence KO
14
23%
Spence points
13
22%
 
Total votes: 60

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23144
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by mickey1975 »

BigDoofus wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Wales wrote:"In an ideal world, he would unify the division against Manny Pacquiao, but the Spence fight is also one that really excites him and fight fans. That could be a big fight here in the UK and with the 75-25 split in place we would be very confident of bringing that fight to Sheffield."
Probably because with a false bid, they could bid £2m and pay each £500,000.
And you think that Brook would agree to that?
Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by BigDoofus »

mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: Probably because with a false bid, they could bid £2m and pay each £500,000.
And you think that Brook would agree to that?
Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.
You think Brook will fight Spence for £500,000?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23144
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by mickey1975 »

BigDoofus wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
And you think that Brook would agree to that?
Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.
You think Brook will fight Spence for £500,000?
He will be told to have any chance of bringing it here, he will have to take a lot less than 75%, whatever that may be.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by BigDoofus »

mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.
You think Brook will fight Spence for £500,000?
He will be told to have any chance of bringing it here, he will have to take a lot less than 75%, whatever that may be.
You write this as a fact. How do you know the ins and outs of all Hearn's and Brook's negotiations?

In my own humble opinion, Brook's purse will be far in excess of £500,000.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by lefty »

BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
And you claimed recently that "Brook wants nothing of Spence".
Well until the fight actually gets made, it's just talk as of now.
As is your insinuation that Brook wants nothing of Spence.
Well he doesn't really. He has to fight him or give up his belt. He'd much rather fight Pacquaio or Khan. His hand is being forced basically. 154 isn't an easy division if he moved up and he also wouldn't have a belt to use as leverage to get the fights he wants.

For what it's worth I actually think Brook would have a good chance against Spence jnr. I think the latter is defensively quite lax and not quite as good as the hype that surrounds him. I think Crawford is a more talented fighter and more worthy of the hype when it comes to American fighters but it is what it is.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by BigDoofus »

lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote: Well until the fight actually gets made, it's just talk as of now.
As is your insinuation that Brook wants nothing of Spence.
Well he doesn't really. He has to fight him or give up his belt. He'd much rather fight Pacquaio or Khan. His hand is being forced basically. 154 isn't an easy division if he moved up and he also wouldn't have a belt to use as leverage to get the fights he wants.

For what it's worth I actually think Brook would have a good chance against Spence jnr. I think the latter is defensively quite lax and not quite as good as the hype that surrounds him. I think Crawford is a more talented fighter and more worthy of the hype when it comes to American fighters but it is what it is.
He might earn more money for fighting Pacquiao or Khan but previously you seemed to insinuate that Brook was ducking Spence.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by lefty »

BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
As is your insinuation that Brook wants nothing of Spence.
Well he doesn't really. He has to fight him or give up his belt. He'd much rather fight Pacquaio or Khan. His hand is being forced basically. 154 isn't an easy division if he moved up and he also wouldn't have a belt to use as leverage to get the fights he wants.

For what it's worth I actually think Brook would have a good chance against Spence jnr. I think the latter is defensively quite lax and not quite as good as the hype that surrounds him. I think Crawford is a more talented fighter and more worthy of the hype when it comes to American fighters but it is what it is.
He might earn more money for fighting Pacquiao or Khan but previously you seemed to insinuate that Brook was ducking Spence.
Well ducking in the sense that he doesn't really want that fight. If he wasn't mandated to take it he wouldn't be going anywhere near it. It's a risky fight.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by Wales »

mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: Probably because with a false bid, they could bid £2m and pay each £500,000.
And you think that Brook would agree to that?
Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.

What's a false bid? Agreement with the fighter who's due to get the 75% that he receives a smaller purse so promoter can secure fight?

Brook reportedly got 3m for the GGG fight, even bagged 400k for the Gavin fight so surely he'd demand more than 500k

If Hearn can sell Brook Gavin as a PPV then bet your arse Brook Spence will be one! Beats any of the Joshua PPVs to date...
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23144
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by mickey1975 »

Brook-Gavin had Joshua on and Mitchell. It also did crap, not sure about 400,000. Eddie always quotes that card as one that didn't do well. It was less than a month after Mayweather-Pac too.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by BigDoofus »

mickey1975 wrote:Brook-Gavin had Joshua on and Mitchell. It also did crap, not sure about 400,000.
I think he was referring to purse, not PPV sales.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by BigDoofus »

lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote: Well he doesn't really. He has to fight him or give up his belt. He'd much rather fight Pacquaio or Khan. His hand is being forced basically. 154 isn't an easy division if he moved up and he also wouldn't have a belt to use as leverage to get the fights he wants.

For what it's worth I actually think Brook would have a good chance against Spence jnr. I think the latter is defensively quite lax and not quite as good as the hype that surrounds him. I think Crawford is a more talented fighter and more worthy of the hype when it comes to American fighters but it is what it is.
He might earn more money for fighting Pacquiao or Khan but previously you seemed to insinuate that Brook was ducking Spence.
Well ducking in the sense that he doesn't really want that fight. If he wasn't mandated to take it he wouldn't be going anywhere near it. It's a risky fight.
First you claimed he would duck the fight, now you're having a go at him for not ducking by claiming that you can read his mind. Great argument.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by Andrew »

mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: Probably because with a false bid, they could bid £2m and pay each £500,000.
And you think that Brook would agree to that?
Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.

Eddie said its PpV in this article

http://www.espn.com/blog/dan-rafael/pos ... -next-year
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23144
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by mickey1975 »

Naandrew wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
And you think that Brook would agree to that?
Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.

Eddie said its PpV in this article

http://www.espn.com/blog/dan-rafael/pos ... -next-year
Ive no doubt it would be on ppv. I doubt it would do well, though.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by BigDoofus »

mickey1975 wrote:
Naandrew wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: Yes. Eddie has said himself it's common practice. Kell-Spence is not a PPV fight. It might not even sell out Sheffield Arena.

Eddie said its PpV in this article

http://www.espn.com/blog/dan-rafael/pos ... -next-year
Ive no doubt it would be on ppv. I doubt it would do well, though.
Do you still think Brook will fight for £500k?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Kell Brook V Errol Spence

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Errol will definitely fight anywhere, he's desperate for a big fight and a title.
Post Reply