BoxRec

BitPlayer wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

The current time crop of heavyweights are in the main fat undisciplined slobs with poor cardiovascular and worse skills.

Holy field would have beaten every single heavyweight around today in his prime.

Holyfield vs AJ wouldn't have been much different as Daffy Duck vs Klitschko (who was 36 or so if I remember it correct). And yes, when you're smallr it's more easy to havegood technic skills, but it still doesn't make much of a difference. Holyfield vs Lewis also showed that.

Unless you are talking about current 54 year old Holyfield, this is silly. Holyfield, while originally a cruiserweight, is one of the greatest heavyweights of all time, Haye is daffy, and Joshua hasn't shown he could hold a candle to that Wlad yet. Hell Holyfield was still a respectably heavyweight well into his 40's, Valuev struggled to beat a 46 year old Holyfield, right before Haye scraped through Valuev.

You're wasting your time. He thinks boxers who have the same frame automatically have the same talent. It's why Bert Cooper was exactly as good as Mike Tyson, Herbie Hide the equal of Muhammad Ali.

Tuan_Jim wrote:

BitPlayer wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Holyfield vs AJ wouldn't have been much different as Daffy Duck vs Klitschko (who was 36 or so if I remember it correct). And yes, when you're smallr it's more easy to havegood technic skills, but it still doesn't make much of a difference. Holyfield vs Lewis also showed that.

Unless you are talking about current 54 year old Holyfield, this is silly. Holyfield, while originally a cruiserweight, is one of the greatest heavyweights of all time, Haye is daffy, and Joshua hasn't shown he could hold a candle to that Wlad yet. Hell Holyfield was still a respectably heavyweight well into his 40's, Valuev struggled to beat a 46 year old Holyfield, right before Haye scraped through Valuev.

You're wasting your time. He thinks boxers who have the same frame automatically have the same talent. It's why Bert Cooper was exactly as good as Mike Tyson, Herbie Hide the equal of Muhammad Ali.

I know, you might as well explain quantum resonance to a chihuahua. He's a total fucktard.

I think it must be an act, nobody can be THAT stupid.

On that note, I think Holyfield's record looks better and better as time goes on. Considering the height, weight and reach he gave away, especially in his early career, his achivements were phenomenal. The Bowe and Holyfield that fought first time, were as good heavyweights as in any era in my opinion. Bowe's peak was very brief, because of his lack of discipline, but he was one hell of a fighter during that prime. I'd have picked either man over Wlad in their respective primes.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

BitPlayer wrote: Unless you are talking about current 54 year old Holyfield, this is silly. Holyfield, while originally a cruiserweight, is one of the greatest heavyweights of all time, Haye is daffy, and Joshua hasn't shown he could hold a candle to that Wlad yet. Hell Holyfield was still a respectably heavyweight well into his 40's, Valuev struggled to beat a 46 year old Holyfield, right before Haye scraped through Valuev.

You're wasting your time. He thinks boxers who have the same frame automatically have the same talent. It's why Bert Cooper was exactly as good as Mike Tyson, Herbie Hide the equal of Muhammad Ali.

I know, you might as well explain quantum resonance to a chihuahua. He's a total fucktard.

I think it must be an act, nobody can be THAT stupid.

It's an act, and a really tiresome one at that. I wish pure troll accounts like this would just be deleted as it's so repetitive and boring.

clopixolacuphase wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:
You're wasting your time. He thinks boxers who have the same frame automatically have the same talent. It's why Bert Cooper was exactly as good as Mike Tyson, Herbie Hide the equal of Muhammad Ali.

I know, you might as well explain quantum resonance to a chihuahua. He's a total fucktard.

I think it must be an act, nobody can be THAT stupid.

It's an act, and a really tiresome one at that. I wish pure troll accounts like this would just be deleted as it's so repetitive and boring.

Hopefully he'll get brain cancer.

What a sad pudendum you have to be to derive pleasure from spouting such drivel, really must be a lonely fornicating loser.

asdfjkl wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:He was hyped? News to me. I'd basically never heard of the guy until like a month ago.

He allays fought on the undercard of Parker.
He's a bit like Tyrone Spong.

Okay I will bite.

Tyrone Spong has zero technique and should of stayed doing k-1.
He will lose when he's put in with his first decent opponent.