Re: The problem i have with this forum
Posted: 28 Apr 2017, 19:37
Well done guys. See some experts on my thread. Ride on 
Well...some fighters touted as defensive wizards (by some) got hit more than Joshua... Ali was wide open for left hooks, got dumped several times, and got his jaw broken.. Roy Jones got smashed out with straight shots... Mayweather got knocked wobble legged... Jack Johnson was one of the greatest defensive masters ever, but some people here think he was taken out by an inept cow puncher. That was a tank job... Willie Pep got stopped... Gene Tunney got knocked down by Dempsey... Hmmm. None of those defensive lapses happened to Joshua and this is only his 4th Heavyweight Championship Fight.. He can only get better... It may be true that he's not a defensive wizard just yet - but he's very hard to hit -- and I think his overall skills are tops in the division with the exception of Luis Ortiz.. However Joshua is a young guy and Ortiz is 38 and climbing.davie wrote:You're probably right on the predictions but AJ is no defensive wizard himself.Kalan wrote:True enough... Takam and Ruiz were tagging Parker up like crazy.. They would fall to AJ and so would Parker... who's defense is lacking.
But yes, he probably would KO all 3 listed above
if you think the difference betweenJip wrote:Josh ko wlad inside 3. Quick work. The difference between a atg hw top 5 and a atg 1 hw will be seen.
And how does he look like the best heavyweight ever?Jip wrote:If aj looks like the best heavyweight ever tonight than i want people in here to apologies to me!
looking like the best boxer ever on a singleJip wrote:If aj looks like the best heavyweight ever tonight than i want people in here to apologies to me!
Has been achieved for the past. Meaning marciano looked like the best hw ever on a single night when heavyweights weights like cw today and had a height of 5'10. In today standars they would have 0 chance. Aj is going to look better than prime lewis and prime ali ever did!man wrote:looking like the best boxer ever on a singleJip wrote:If aj looks like the best heavyweight ever tonight than i want people in here to apologies to me!
night was achieved thousands of times and
is ... meaningless.
No problemJip wrote:Wait ioky.
Let us speak again after the fight.
Kalan wrote:Well...some fighters touted as defensive wizards (by some) got hit more than Joshua... Ali was wide open for left hooks, got dumped several times, and got his jaw broken.. Roy Jones got smashed out with straight shots... Mayweather got knocked wobble legged... Jack Johnson was one of the greatest defensive masters ever, but some people here think he was taken out by an inept cow puncher. That was a tank job... Willie Pep got stopped... Gene Tunney got knocked down by Dempsey... Hmmm. None of those defensive lapses happened to Joshua and this is only his 4th Heavyweight Championship Fight.. He can only get better... It may be true that he's not a defensive wizard just yet - but he's very hard to hit -- and I think his overall skills are tops in the division with the exception of Luis Ortiz.. However Joshua is a young guy and Ortiz is 38 and climbing.davie wrote:You're probably right on the predictions but AJ is no defensive wizard himself.Kalan wrote:True enough... Takam and Ruiz were tagging Parker up like crazy.. They would fall to AJ and so would Parker... who's defense is lacking.
But yes, he probably would KO all 3 listed above
You're still as clueless as ever!Jip wrote:He didnt look unbeatable, but nobody realy does.
Also lets not forget he faced and beat the best heavyweight of the last 10 years. When u hang in their with the best chances are high u can feel the canvas. Aj went down from a big punch and came back and won in impressiv fashion against a much more activ wlad, not the non punching ghost fury faced.
People will downgrade me cause aj didnt make quick work of him, but one thing is for sure this 6'6 250 pds 100 % ko aj would beat smaller ali and lewis. Vitaly would pose the most problems. Vitaly and aj are the thoughest to beat heavyweights ever, cause of their size and imens power!
You also said Joshua would crush him in 3 and that it would be an easy fight. You also didnt predict Joshua getting dropped heavily by the 41 yr old Klitschko.Jip wrote:Haha...but i had it right. Young aj after only 18 fights could. Do what previously for more than 6 years nobody could do. Win against wlad in a clear fashion. With clear i mean t/ko.
Where all the non experts who favoured wlad cause he had a better record now...something 68 fights for wlad and only 18 for aj. Number of fights and record mean nothing when u face somebody, only thing what matters: are u a better boxer than the man infront of you or not?
Yeah I do some of that I have to admit.Jip wrote:The amount of non experts in here. Its crazy.
We have a talent that we have rarely seen in boxing with footwork rarely seen before, with punch variation and speed at atg level and what are the hating non experts say"who did he fight". Basicly they cant hate on his skills and physical ability, si they hate on his record, when other top boxers like morales. Manny or calzaghe never faced such good opponents in their first 10 fights. Just be happy that we have a new atg in boxing with very rare skills. Boxers like this dont gez born often. Appreciate.
Same with sj. After 20 years of a boring heavyweight division with lewis, the wrestler wlad and roboter vitaly we finaly have an athletic tall strong elite puncher and all u do is hate. Non experts.
Maybe some of u should start watching table tennis cause some of you dont have no clue when they see a very good boxer infront of them. To me its more than easy to realize if someones the real deal or not.