Page 3 of 3

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 22 Jun 2017, 08:50
by Ricky_
gilgamesh wrote:No Contest was the right call. The situation you refer to wasn't a flagrant enough foul that it should've resulted in a TKO loss.

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 22 Jun 2017, 09:01
by GlobalBox
handsofstone wrote:Was it confirmed that this was changed to a NC?
Not yet got to have an official meeting apparently but it's leaked that it almost certainly will be changed, don't have a choice really.

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 22 Jun 2017, 13:44
by gilgamesh
Ricky_ wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:No Contest was the right call. The situation you refer to wasn't a flagrant enough foul that it should've resulted in a TKO loss.

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
There an X-Ray showing Hopkins' shoulder injury was legit. Dirrell never presented anything of the sort.

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 22 Jun 2017, 15:02
by Ricky_
gilgamesh wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:No Contest was the right call. The situation you refer to wasn't a flagrant enough foul that it should've resulted in a TKO loss.

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
There an X-Ray showing Hopkins' shoulder injury was legit. Dirrell never presented anything of the sort.

He never produced an xray, he had some phoney doctor report. You could tell just by looking at it that it was fine, then when he uses that arm to prop himself up, that;s all the evidence you need. Guy's a fraud.

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 22 Jun 2017, 15:27
by gilgamesh
Ricky_ wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:

The Hopkins "shoulder injury" is the fakest thing i've ever seen, only Dirrell comes close.
There an X-Ray showing Hopkins' shoulder injury was legit. Dirrell never presented anything of the sort.

He never produced an xray, he had some phoney doctor report. You could tell just by looking at it that it was fine, then when he uses that arm to prop himself up, that;s all the evidence you need. Guy's a fraud.
He fought Dawson in an immediate rematch and lost. What's the big deal? He got the loss he was inevitably going to get anyway...so what's it matter? It's not like he escaped his loss he merely postponed it :lol:

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 22 Jun 2017, 18:42
by SaadOffTheDeck
He did escape a loss, really bizarre that you think it's ok for a fighter to get screwed as long as they get a rematch. I know you agreed with the bullshit decision and I get that rationale. This whole, who cares because they fought again attitude is ass.

Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Moises Flores

Posted: 23 Jun 2017, 04:18
by watsupdoc87
Take a point of. Lad could of kept fighting and get the beating of a lifetime but pretended like a bitch he couldn't hoping to win dq. fornicate him and dirrels :bag: