BoxRec

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Of course I was joking. If you give Povetkin the benefit when there is no doubt, you should consider Wilder downright persecuted. Nobody has ever been more guilty than Povetkin at anything. Shocks me a man of your intellect doesn't see that. You can't even offer one reasonable reason why.

asdfjkl wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Of course I was joking. If you give Povetkin the benefit when there is no doubt, you should consider Wilder downright persecuted. Nobody has ever been more guilty than Povetkin at anything. Shocks me a man of your intellect doesn't see that. You can't even offer one reasonable reason why.

Even the retarded Wada/Vada themself had no option left in their first case but admitted Povetkin was innocent, despite all the American media wrote he was guilty and ruined his name. How sad is that? Against an innocent men! And some retarded people actually believe he did something wrong, while in reality he didn't.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's definitely better, just means you need less.

boxing_rocks wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It's definitely better, just means you need less.

That's not how it works with drugs or alcohol. It means that you get more intoxicated.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Of course I was joking. If you give Povetkin the benefit when there is no doubt, you should consider Wilder downright persecuted. Nobody has ever been more guilty than Povetkin at anything. Shocks me a man of your intellect doesn't see that. You can't even offer one reasonable reason why.

candyslim wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Of course I was joking. If you give Povetkin the benefit when there is no doubt, you should consider Wilder downright persecuted. Nobody has ever been more guilty than Povetkin at anything. Shocks me a man of your intellect doesn't see that. You can't even offer one reasonable reason why.

Saad I did little else but give reasonable reasons and your response was simply "wow" which you declined to expand upon and when previously I referred to the details supplied by Kalan on more than one occasion, because he has far more patience than I do, for the nitty-gritty of individual drug tests, your response to my question about why nobody wanted to address his points, was that he's a troll, whatever he wrote was bullshit, you never read his posts and I'm incredibly dim, for taking any notice of him. You're not really a fan are you I can tell.

"Nobody has ever been more guilty of anything than Povetkin "??? Are sure Deontay is the one being persecuted? Believe it or not I like both fighters who are definitely top 5 in the world. I do get a little impatient with Deontay carrying on about everybody ducking him when he uses any excuse to swerve Ortiz, and has done so for two nearly three years, but I like him and know the division would be much poorer without him, without either of them in fact.

I like to believe that I am fair with regard to both fighters. Maybe I fall short of that but I try.

candyslim wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Of course I was joking. If you give Povetkin the benefit when there is no doubt, you should consider Wilder downright persecuted. Nobody has ever been more guilty than Povetkin at anything. Shocks me a man of your intellect doesn't see that. You can't even offer one reasonable reason why.

Saad I did little else but give reasonable reasons and your response was simply "wow" which you declined to expand upon and when previously I referred to the details supplied by Kalan on more than one occasion, because he has far more patience than I do, for the nitty-gritty of individual drug tests, your response to my question about why nobody wanted to address his points, was that he's a troll, whatever he wrote was bullshit, you never read his posts and I'm incredibly dim, for taking any notice of him. You're not really a fan are you I can tell.

"Nobody has ever been more guilty of anything than Povetkin "??? Are sure Deontay is the one being persecuted? Believe it or not I like both fighters who are definitely top 5 in the world. I do get a little impatient with Deontay carrying on about everybody ducking him when he uses any excuse to swerve Ortiz, and has done so for two nearly three years, but I like him and know the division would be much poorer without him, without either of them in fact.

I like to believe that I am fair with regard to both fighters. Maybe I fall short of that but I try.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

candyslim wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Of course I was joking. If you give Povetkin the benefit when there is no doubt, you should consider Wilder downright persecuted. Nobody has ever been more guilty than Povetkin at anything. Shocks me a man of your intellect doesn't see that. You can't even offer one reasonable reason why.

Saad I did little else but give reasonable reasons and your response was simply "wow" which you declined to expand upon and when previously I referred to the details supplied by Kalan on more than one occasion, because he has far more patience than I do, for the nitty-gritty of individual drug tests, your response to my question about why nobody wanted to address his points, was that he's a troll, whatever he wrote was bullshit, you never read his posts and I'm incredibly dim, for taking any notice of him. You're not really a fan are you I can tell.

"Nobody has ever been more guilty of anything than Povetkin "??? Are sure Deontay is the one being persecuted? Believe it or not I like both fighters who are definitely top 5 in the world. I do get a little impatient with Deontay carrying on about everybody ducking him when he uses any excuse to swerve Ortiz, and has done so for two nearly three years, but I like him and know the division would be much poorer without him, without either of them in fact.

I like to believe that I am fair with regard to both fighters. Maybe I fall short of that but I try.

No, nothing reasonable from you on the topic.

That rather depends on whether you're prepared to concede that someone can at once be reasonable yet take a contrary position to you. Actually my position is not directly contrary to yours because you are saying it can only be this way - anyone who doesn't accept that is stupid, whereas I say you might be right but not necessarily. I'm the one who is unreasonable? You can sure learn a lot on this forum.

Conspiracies are hatched for someone to gain something.

I did explain at some length why the WBC might repeat might have thought they had a lot gain, or rather a lot to lose if everything was left to chance.

There are no winners here, only losers,

See above.

your response to that was tell me to read kalans drivel.

That wasn't my only response. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. You don't need to agree with everything he says, but surely you need to read his drivel to be sure that's what is?

Perhaps I've overestimated your intellect.

I'm gratified and proud that I was able to fool you for as long as I did

Enjoy the weather on fantasy island.

No need to travel. It's thirty degrees in sunny East London and for once that's celcius.

I won't discuss it further with you.

Well I'd kinda worked that out previously when you dismissed me with a "wow" .