BoxRec

Povetkin is following his natural and expected curve, not great against Wach, not great against Duhaupas, somehow Duhaupas is so low leveled that Povetkin seemed to be great anyway and now not great against Rudenko, somehow still better then Hughie Fury for example.
I think Wilder for example would have a fair chance if he fought him, which ofcourse Wilder doesn't, since he's a pussy, but imagine if.

Not a good card. Lubkovich was the only real highlight for me.

tiny_acres wrote:Well his 5 fight ko streak is over.
Amazing he tests clean and looks like garbage.

My streak of 8 fights and almost four years of not watching him fight for a second was extended!

Why haven't you watched him? He's given some aggressive KO performances at a solid level. Many of the things you say you like about Wilder would seem to apply to Pov, and his opposition hasn't been any worse...

Put that lubovich kid on my watchlist after his first fight and good to actually watch him live today

crusader wrote:Why haven't you watched him? He's given some aggressive KO performances at a solid level. Many of the things you say you like about Wilder would seem to apply to Pov, and his opposition hasn't been any worse...

Well, I've kind of drifted past the point of hunting streams. The only fight of his that was televised here, to the best of my recollection, was Wlad. I predicted that would be one of the ugliest, dull, uncompetitive fights ever contested. Reading on here afterward my suspicions were confirmed. If that fight was on AWE today, I would have watched it. He's not on my no watch list or anything.

Workman like performance from Povetkin, never lost a round, hurt Rudenko a few times but showed no killer instinct, no way does Rudenko go 12 rounds with Joshua, I liked the fact that Rudenko went the distance after the fiasco in the 1st round with the hurt neck, he showed a few warning signs but you just knew Povetkin couldn't capatalise

I'd like to see Rudenko with a world class trainer, I reckon there's a contender in there

handsofstone wrote:Workman like performance from Povetkin, never lost a round, hurt Rudenko a few times but showed no killer instinct, no way does Rudenko go 12 rounds with Joshua, I liked the fact that Rudenko went the distance after the fiasco in the 1st round with the hurt neck, he showed a few warning signs but you just knew Povetkin couldn't capatalise

I'd like to see Rudenko with a world class trainer, I reckon there's a contender in there

At the end of the first round, I was convinced Rudenko would quit on his stool no later than the third. Fair play.

asdfjkl wrote:Povetkin is following his natural and expected curve, not great against Wach, not great against Duhaupas, somehow Duhaupas is so low leveled that Povetkin seemed to be great anyway and now not great against Rudenko, somehow still better then Hughie Fury for example.
I think Wilder for example would have a fair chance if he fought him, which ofcourse Wilder doesn't, since he's a pussy, but imagine if.

Wilder didn't fight Povetkin cause he was hot on drugs.

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:Povetkin is following his natural and expected curve, not great against Wach, not great against Duhaupas, somehow Duhaupas is so low leveled that Povetkin seemed to be great anyway and now not great against Rudenko, somehow still better then Hughie Fury for example.
I think Wilder for example would have a fair chance if he fought him, which ofcourse Wilder doesn't, since he's a pussy, but imagine if.

Wilder didn't fight Povetkin cause he was hot on drugs.

He wasn't... On top of that Meldonium isn't drugs at all, weed is drugs, Meldonium isn't.

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:Povetkin is following his natural and expected curve, not great against Wach, not great against Duhaupas, somehow Duhaupas is so low leveled that Povetkin seemed to be great anyway and now not great against Rudenko, somehow still better then Hughie Fury for example.
I think Wilder for example would have a fair chance if he fought him, which ofcourse Wilder doesn't, since he's a pussy, but imagine if.

Wilder didn't fight Povetkin cause he was hot on drugs.

He wasn't... On top of that Meldonium isn't drugs at all, weed is drugs, Meldonium isn't.

Do you think paracetamol is a drug?

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
Wilder didn't fight Povetkin cause he was hot on drugs.

He wasn't... On top of that Meldonium isn't drugs at all, weed is drugs, Meldonium isn't.

Do you think paracetamol is a drug?

It's a flawed medicine perhaps, but not a drug is it?

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: He wasn't... On top of that Meldonium isn't drugs at all, weed is drugs, Meldonium isn't.

Do you think paracetamol is a drug?

It's a flawed medicine perhaps, but not a drug is it?

What on earth does a flawed medicine mean?

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
Do you think paracetamol is a drug?

It's a flawed medicine perhaps, but not a drug is it?

What on earth does a flawed medicine mean?

Well, where do you need a paracetamol for? What does it actually do? In my opinion it's useless trash with a good story behind it that appearantly sells good to many people. They claim it makes you feel less pain, but TBH I've had like 3 of them in my entire life, and I didn't notice any change. So for me, it's a medicine that doesn't work, a flawed medicine.

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: It's a flawed medicine perhaps, but not a drug is it?

What on earth does a flawed medicine mean?

Well, where do you need a paracetamol for? What does it actually do? In my opinion it's useless trash with a good story behind it that appearantly sells good to many people. They claim it makes you feel less pain, but TBH I've had like 3 of them in my entire life, and I didn't notice any change. So for me, it's a medicine that doesn't work, a flawed medicine.

fornicating nonsense comes out of your mouth pal

handsofstone wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
What on earth does a flawed medicine mean?

Well, where do you need a paracetamol for? What does it actually do? In my opinion it's useless trash with a good story behind it that appearantly sells good to many people. They claim it makes you feel less pain, but TBH I've had like 3 of them in my entire life, and I didn't notice any change. So for me, it's a medicine that doesn't work, a flawed medicine.

effing nonsense comes out of your mouth pal

Oké, tell me your story ;)

asdfjkl wrote:

handsofstone wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Well, where do you need a paracetamol for? What does it actually do? In my opinion it's useless trash with a good story behind it that appearantly sells good to many people. They claim it makes you feel less pain, but TBH I've had like 3 of them in my entire life, and I didn't notice any change. So for me, it's a medicine that doesn't work, a flawed medicine.

effing nonsense comes out of your mouth pal

Oké, tell me your story ;)

Ive took paracetamol 4 times and I can confirm it works

handsofstone wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

handsofstone wrote: effing nonsense comes out of your mouth pal

Oké, tell me your story ;)

Ive took paracetamol 4 times and I can confirm it works

assfjkl is a pure fanny

handsofstone wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

handsofstone wrote: effing nonsense comes out of your mouth pal

Oké, tell me your story ;)

Ive took paracetamol 4 times and I can confirm it works

Hmmm sorry asdfjkl, but his story holds more validity than yours. Maybe you should take a few packs in one go and let us know if that works?

Rob3_142 wrote:

handsofstone wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Oké, tell me your story ;)

Ive took paracetamol 4 times and I can confirm it works

Hmmm sorry asdfjkl, but his story holds more validity than yours. Maybe you should take a few packs in one go and let us know if that works?

Then what did it do for you handsofstone? And do you consider it a drug?

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

handsofstone wrote: Ive took paracetamol 4 times and I can confirm it works

Hmmm sorry asdfjkl, but his story holds more validity than yours. Maybe you should take a few packs in one go and let us know if that works?

Then what did it do for you handsofstone? And do you consider it a drug?

Of course I do its probably the most popular drug known to man, its certainly more of a drug than weed which you claimed, most people would consider weed a herb especially if their from Holland like you claim to be

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:

handsofstone wrote: Ive took paracetamol 4 times and I can confirm it works

Hmmm sorry asdfjkl, but his story holds more validity than yours. Maybe you should take a few packs in one go and let us know if that works?

Then what did it do for you handsofstone? And do you consider it a drug?

By definition paracetamol is a drug. In asdjkl world, only substances which are prohibited are drugs, I'm assuming.

Rob3_142 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:
Hmmm sorry asdfjkl, but his story holds more validity than yours. Maybe you should take a few packs in one go and let us know if that works?

Then what did it do for you handsofstone? And do you consider it a drug?

By definition paracetamol is a drug. In asdjkl world, only substances which are prohibited are drugs, I'm assuming.

Medication, but maybe it's a translationthing. When I tell a French men I'm a Dutch men he thinks I'm a German, when I tell an American I'd like to play football he says soccer? No, your mum may suck balls, I play football. In America they call all the medicine drugs, here we only call substances that have influencing your brain as a main goal drugs. Even anabolic substances and such aren't called drugs. But I know what you mean, but to call everything drugs is just narrow minded, but it's oke, we're used to that from Americans.

IBF have exonerated Povetkin of any wrongdoing..

He is now ranked at #13 for IBF!

Under Charles Martin lol
*Under Wach, who he beat in his last fight lol

And Hammer above Klitschko, wow, what a list.