Re: Povetkin is overrated
Posted: 02 Jul 2017, 13:47
I thought Negron looked pretty good last week. I'd have him and Chisora in there. probably replacing Rivas & Bryan. Very solid top 20, though. Certainly the best one in the thread. 
The current rank 100 heavyweight is "Iago Kiladze" TBH I've never heard of this guy, which is surprising, untill you notice it's actually a cruiserweight who recently became fat. And TBH I think this guy, purely based on his stats, actually has a really fair chance to beat Stiverne.gilgamesh wrote:The fact that there's not 100 Heavyweights better than Stiverne probably has a lot do with that.asdfjkl wrote:Oh well, I was surprised people had Stiverne in their top 100.gilgamesh wrote:You have Tony Yoka and Daniel Dubois Top 20 already?
Hughie #5?
I didn't get a chance to see Negron's performance. I'll try to catch it on Youtube later on if it's up. I could see him joining my rankings based off of that win though and all the good things I've heard about it.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I thought Negron looked pretty good last week. I'd have him and Chisora in there. probably replacing Rivas & Bryan. Very solid top 20, though. Certainly the best one in the thread.
asdfjkl wrote:The current rank 100 heavyweight is "Iago Kiladze" TBH I've never heard of this guy, which is surprising, untill you notice it's actually a cruiserweight who recently became fat. And TBH I think this guy, purely based on his stats, actually has a really fair chance to beat Stiverne.gilgamesh wrote:The fact that there's not 100 Heavyweights better than Stiverne probably has a lot do with that.asdfjkl wrote: Oh well, I was surprised people had Stiverne in their top 100.
Also note that inactive guys, like Briggs, Tyson Fury (who's my rank 2 when in shape, but inactive), Billy Wright and Vyacheslav Glazkov are currently not ranked. And don't forget about the top cruiserweights either, we've seen what happened to Daffy Duck against Tony Bellew.
And I also think that Stiverne has absolutely no chance against guys like Rostislav Plechko for example.
If I really try I think I can name over a 100 guys who can beat Stiverne.
Shannon Briggs hasn't been in my Top 30 in YEARS!asdfjkl wrote:The current rank 100 heavyweight is "Iago Kiladze" TBH I've never heard of this guy, which is surprising, untill you notice it's actually a cruiserweight who recently became fat. And TBH I think this guy, purely based on his stats, actually has a really fair chance to beat Stiverne.gilgamesh wrote:The fact that there's not 100 Heavyweights better than Stiverne probably has a lot do with that.asdfjkl wrote: Oh well, I was surprised people had Stiverne in their top 100.
Also note that inactive guys, like Briggs, Tyson Fury (who's my rank 2 when in shape, but inactive), Billy Wright and Vyacheslav Glazkov are currently not ranked. And don't forget about the top cruiserweights either, we've seen what happened to Daffy Duck against Tony Bellew.
Having Ruiz Jr. in your top 10 says otherwise.gilgamesh wrote:Doesn't matter who I think would win between Chisora and Hammer. Guys don't get ranked based on who I think would beat who, they get ranked based on who they HAVE beaten, and where that currently sees them in the division.Mexi-Box wrote:As I said, the fight was razor close where Whyte didn't show at all that he was on a different level to Chisora. Ranking them leagues apart is totally wrong here, especially since this division doesn't really have dudes with stand-out resumes.gilgamesh wrote:
Chisora hasn't been in my Top 20 in quite a while. Whyte was already in my Top 15-20 somewhere. Beating Chisora advanced Whyte's career, losing to Whyte did not advance Chisora's career....hope this helps.
Also, I think it's ridiculous not having Chisora in the top 20. Would you really favor Hammer over Chisora because I sure wouldn't. That's why there is a level of skill to the rankings as well.
There are guys not in my Top 20 that I feel confident could kick the asses of guys in my Top 20, but until they do it, they don't take their spot.
I'm serious, just scroll a bit through this fight:Counter-puncher wrote:How many of them would be named Spong, 50?
asdfjkl wrote:I'm serious, just scroll a bit through this fight:Counter-puncher wrote:How many of them would be named Spong, 50?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZiRI2tAes&t=2520s
Ray Austin schooled him easely by most of the fight and remember that this was over 5 years ago in Stiverne his prime! Stiverne only got older and older ever since and who are we talking about? Ray Austin! !?
Well I'm sorry, but I really don't think Stiverne belongs in the top 100 any more. He has had a lot of luck in his carreer and he isn't the only one, but that doesn't mean he's any good.
Ruiz Jr. is in the Top 10 because of how close he held Parker in their fight. Ruiz Jr. was previously unbeaten going into that fight. Chisora I've nicknamed "Loser to the Stars" because that's what he is. He beats decent mid-level guys, and loses to names. He's not Top 20 to me at the moment, if you think he is fine. I don't really give a sh*t.Mexi-Box wrote:Having Ruiz Jr. in your top 10 says otherwise.gilgamesh wrote:Doesn't matter who I think would win between Chisora and Hammer. Guys don't get ranked based on who I think would beat who, they get ranked based on who they HAVE beaten, and where that currently sees them in the division.Mexi-Box wrote: As I said, the fight was razor close where Whyte didn't show at all that he was on a different level to Chisora. Ranking them leagues apart is totally wrong here, especially since this division doesn't really have dudes with stand-out resumes.
Also, I think it's ridiculous not having Chisora in the top 20. Would you really favor Hammer over Chisora because I sure wouldn't. That's why there is a level of skill to the rankings as well.
There are guys not in my Top 20 that I feel confident could kick the asses of guys in my Top 20, but until they do it, they don't take their spot.
So is this a standard move on your part? You rank guys based on what they did 5 years ago? No wonder your rankings are off.asdfjkl wrote:I'm serious, just scroll a bit through this fight:Counter-puncher wrote:How many of them would be named Spong, 50?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxZiRI2tAes&t=2520s
Ray Austin schooled him easely by most of the fight and remember that this was over 5 years ago in Stiverne his prime! Stiverne only got older and older ever since and who are we talking about? Ray Austin! !?
Well I'm sorry, but I really don't think Stiverne belongs in the top 100 any more. He has had a lot of luck in his carreer and he isn't the only one, but that doesn't mean he's any good.
As I said, you don't even follow your own standards. That's the reason why I would put Chisora next to Whyte too and why you are wrong not doing the same. I'm tired of this conversation, and I'm moving on.gilgamesh wrote:Ruiz Jr. is in the Top 10 because of how close he held Parker in their fight. Ruiz Jr. was previously unbeaten going into that fight. Chisora I've nicknamed "Loser to the Stars" because that's what he is. He beats decent mid-level guys, and loses to names. He's not Top 20 to me at the moment, if you think he is fine. I don't really give a sh*t.Mexi-Box wrote:Having Ruiz Jr. in your top 10 says otherwise.gilgamesh wrote:
Doesn't matter who I think would win between Chisora and Hammer. Guys don't get ranked based on who I think would beat who, they get ranked based on who they HAVE beaten, and where that currently sees them in the division.
There are guys not in my Top 20 that I feel confident could kick the asses of guys in my Top 20, but until they do it, they don't take their spot.
Good I'm tired of it too. I have an answer for every little gripe you want to give me. If you don't like my answers that's fine, but you got one.Mexi-Box wrote:As I said, you don't even follow your own standards. That's the reason why I would put Chisora next to Whyte too and why you are wrong not doing the same. I'm tired of this conversation, and I'm moving on.gilgamesh wrote:Ruiz Jr. is in the Top 10 because of how close he held Parker in their fight. Ruiz Jr. was previously unbeaten going into that fight. Chisora I've nicknamed "Loser to the Stars" because that's what he is. He beats decent mid-level guys, and loses to names. He's not Top 20 to me at the moment, if you think he is fine. I don't really give a sh*t.Mexi-Box wrote: Having Ruiz Jr. in your top 10 says otherwise.
The guy that hasn't contributed anything to this conversation and has never said anything intelligent in his posting history comes here and judges top 20 lists. You think your opinion matters.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I thought Negron looked pretty good last week. I'd have him and Chisora in there. probably replacing Rivas & Bryan. Very solid top 20, though. Certainly the best one in the thread.
Shannon was probably a top 30 ish boxer just two years ago, but that's not the question, I think Shannon would beat Stiverne, and still is able to be a top 100 heavyweight boxer. Glazkov probably indeed won't become a top 20, but that wasn't the question, he would win a fight against Stiverne. Billy Wright used to be rank 20 by the WBC, having several local WBC titles. I can understand it if you don't know the whole division, people also wondered who Duhaupas and Szpilka were when they fought Wilder, and when I say Jun Long Zhang people often think I'm talking about Zhilei Zhang, or Taishan Dong, thinking they know it all.gilgamesh wrote:Shannon Briggs hasn't been in my Top 30 in YEARS!asdfjkl wrote:The current rank 100 heavyweight is "Iago Kiladze" TBH I've never heard of this guy, which is surprising, untill you notice it's actually a cruiserweight who recently became fat. And TBH I think this guy, purely based on his stats, actually has a really fair chance to beat Stiverne.gilgamesh wrote:
The fact that there's not 100 Heavyweights better than Stiverne probably has a lot do with that.
Also note that inactive guys, like Briggs, Tyson Fury (who's my rank 2 when in shape, but inactive), Billy Wright and Vyacheslav Glazkov are currently not ranked. And don't forget about the top cruiserweights either, we've seen what happened to Daffy Duck against Tony Bellew.
Tyson Fury would rejoin the Top 10 with a comeback win, but until he's an active fighter again he's gone. Glazkov probably won't be rejoining my Top 20 anytime soon unless he earns it.
Billy Wright...who?
I got one from you, but it wasn't anything logical if you really want to come off like that.gilgamesh wrote:Good I'm tired of it too. I have an answer for every little gripe you want to give me. If you don't like my answers that's fine, but you got one.Mexi-Box wrote:As I said, you don't even follow your own standards. That's the reason why I would put Chisora next to Whyte too and why you are wrong not doing the same. I'm tired of this conversation, and I'm moving on.gilgamesh wrote:
Ruiz Jr. is in the Top 10 because of how close he held Parker in their fight. Ruiz Jr. was previously unbeaten going into that fight. Chisora I've nicknamed "Loser to the Stars" because that's what he is. He beats decent mid-level guys, and loses to names. He's not Top 20 to me at the moment, if you think he is fine. I don't really give a sh*t.
Mexi-Box wrote:The guy that hasn't contributed anything to this conversation and has never said anything intelligent in his posting history comes here and judges top 20 lists. You think your opinion matters.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I thought Negron looked pretty good last week. I'd have him and Chisora in there. probably replacing Rivas & Bryan. Very solid top 20, though. Certainly the best one in the thread.
Briggs wouldn't even fight Stiverne. In case you haven't noticed other than Vitali...whom he lost every round to and put into the ER by...Briggs hasn't fought a Top 60 ranked Heavyweight in like 10 years.asdfjkl wrote:Shannon was probably a top 30 ish boxer just two years ago, but that's not the question, I think Shannon would beat Stiverne, and still is able to be a top 100 heavyweight boxer. Glazkov probably indeed won't become a top 20, but that wasn't the question, he would win a fight against Stiverne. Billy Wright used to be rank 20 by the WBC, having several local WBC titles. I can understand it if you don't know the whole division, people also wondered who Duhaupas and Szpilka were when they fought Wilder, and when I say Jun Long Zhang people often think I'm talking about Zhilei Zhang, or Taishan Dong, thinking they know it all.gilgamesh wrote:Shannon Briggs hasn't been in my Top 30 in YEARS!asdfjkl wrote: The current rank 100 heavyweight is "Iago Kiladze" TBH I've never heard of this guy, which is surprising, untill you notice it's actually a cruiserweight who recently became fat. And TBH I think this guy, purely based on his stats, actually has a really fair chance to beat Stiverne.
Also note that inactive guys, like Briggs, Tyson Fury (who's my rank 2 when in shape, but inactive), Billy Wright and Vyacheslav Glazkov are currently not ranked. And don't forget about the top cruiserweights either, we've seen what happened to Daffy Duck against Tony Bellew.
Tyson Fury would rejoin the Top 10 with a comeback win, but until he's an active fighter again he's gone. Glazkov probably won't be rejoining my Top 20 anytime soon unless he earns it.
Billy Wright...who?
Parker ranks above Povetkin because he's still in play for major fights. PEDvetkin isn't gonna be getting offers for major fights ever again. He's not a relevant Heavyweight anymore really. He still has to be ranked for now based on what he's done, but he's toxic in the Boxing business now.crusader wrote:Parker shouldn't be above Povetkin; his resume clearly isn't as good and he looked worse last fight against Cojanu than Pov did against a better fighter in Rudenko. Ruiz may be good, but he's rated almosst entirely on giving Parker a very tough fight
You don't know what happened with Briggs during the Vitali fight? Oké, I'll tell you, he fought Vitali for 12 rounds with one arm, so that explains why he couldn't show a good performance. Vitali himself was getting old fast indeed, but probably could still beat Stiverne.gilgamesh wrote:Briggs wouldn't even fight Stiverne. In case you haven't noticed other than Vitali...whom he lost every round to and put into the ER by...Briggs hasn't fought a Top 60 ranked Heavyweight in like 10 years.asdfjkl wrote:Shannon was probably a top 30 ish boxer just two years ago, but that's not the question, I think Shannon would beat Stiverne, and still is able to be a top 100 heavyweight boxer. Glazkov probably indeed won't become a top 20, but that wasn't the question, he would win a fight against Stiverne. Billy Wright used to be rank 20 by the WBC, having several local WBC titles. I can understand it if you don't know the whole division, people also wondered who Duhaupas and Szpilka were when they fought Wilder, and when I say Jun Long Zhang people often think I'm talking about Zhilei Zhang, or Taishan Dong, thinking they know it all.gilgamesh wrote:
Shannon Briggs hasn't been in my Top 30 in YEARS!
Tyson Fury would rejoin the Top 10 with a comeback win, but until he's an active fighter again he's gone. Glazkov probably won't be rejoining my Top 20 anytime soon unless he earns it.
Billy Wright...who?
Briggs isn't Top 40. He wasn't Top 20 when he got a shot at Vitali. He's sh*t and has been a shot fighter for over 10 years.
Stiverne would beat him comfortably. I'd pick Derric Rossy to beat Briggs.
I know all 3 Chinese Heavyweights you mention. They suck.
I knew who Szpilka and Duhaupas were well before they fought Wilder.
You don't know what happened with Briggs during the Vitali fight...I'll tell youasdfjkl wrote: You don't know what happened with Briggs during the Vitali fight? Oké, I'll tell you, he fought Vitali for 12 rounds with one arm, so that explains why he couldn't show a good performance. Vitali himself was getting old fast indeed, but probably could still beat Stiverne.
I expect Derric Rossy to get KOed within 1 round against Briggs, even today.
And I also think Jun Long Zhang is good enough to win against Deontay Wilder.
You think Joshua or Wilder are gonna waste their time with him again?crusader wrote:Aren't the WBA and WBO going to rank Povetkin now? If he has a ranking and brings $$ to the table, he may well still land a title fight.
He's active and has beaten relatively good opposition, so I think he should be ranked based on that rather than an assumption that he won't be landing meaningful bouts in the future.