Amir Mansour Calls Out Heavyweight Division!

[asdfjkl]

Szpilka just last a fight in four rounds...

I didn't ignore the Povetkin thing, he just fought a higher ranked guy, Whyte might do the same, but I very much doubt it.
I was the one defending Wilder when he fought Szpilka, because Szpilka was the highest ranked availeble guy.

@ light one, nice edit, because in the beginning I could easely proof you wrong.

[In the know 85]

Mansours a bum.

[Taansend]

If you actually follow the sport you start learning the people involved better, you know their reactions, you realise who's a lier and who isn't, things like that. You'll recognice behaviour and you know automatically which things most likely did happen and what things are most likely a lie.

It's not that surprising that Povetkin turned out to be innocent, twice and it's not that surprising that Wilder and the WBC act like he is, it's all very predictable actually, once you start watching and following boxing.
Within the heavyweigth league I'm usually right, sometimes it just takes a while before the evidence is there and yes that's sometimes very annoying, especially if there are retards that only follow the mainstream media who spread bullshit, usually it's like, the more evidence, the more easy I can show I'm right, somehow the evidence is not always there straight away.

I know English isn't your first language, so I'll try again.

I'm asking you why you think it's ok to call Dillian Whyte a COWARD and you're talking about someone named Charlie Zelanov and then talking about Povetkin. Neither of which is relevant to you calling Whyte a coward.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour... You really didn't read the article did you? Also, please read my actual post about it, because you're putting words in my mouth, which is a kind of sad.

How do you know he ducked Mansour?

What words did I put in your mouth?

[asdfjkl]

I know English isn't your first language, so I'll try again.

I'm asking you why you think it's ok to call Dillian Whyte a COWARD and you're talking about someone named Charlie Zelanov and then talking about Povetkin. Neither of which is relevant to you calling Whyte a coward.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour... You really didn't read the article did you? Also, please read my actual post about it, because you're putting words in my mouth, which is a kind of sad.

How do you know he ducked Mansour?

What words did I put in your mouth?

I wrote:

Hello Dillian Whyte, if it's true, I do think Whyte is a coward and yes, I'm following Mansour for quite a while now and didn't know this.

So I wrote, "if it's true" which is a kind of essential information in this matter, then...
Now you act like I'm taking his words for it, and because I'm not a coward I'm even willing to explain the logic behind it, somehow you then abuse that in such a way which makes it seem like I'm calling Whyte a coward.
If Mansour can back this up and Whyte can't get any better boxer, but will fight a lower ranked boxer, then it's easy to say Whyte himself ducked Mansour, but this is all referring to, "if it's true".

[Enlightened-One]

So I wrote, "if it's true" which is a kind of essential information in this matter, then...
Now you act like I'm taking his words for it, and because I'm not a coward I'm even willing to explain the logic behind it, somehow you then abuse that in such a way which makes it seem like I'm calling Whyte a coward.
If Mansour can back this up and Whyte can't get any better boxer, but will fight a lower ranked boxer, then it's easy to say Whyte himself ducked Mansour, but this is all referring to, "if it's true".

You have claimed that Dillian Whyte "ducked" Amir Mansour and also accused him of being a "coward" in this thread numerous times.

You then received criticism from multiple forum members for your casual and excessive use of terms like "duck" and "coward" without performing your due diligence, since you made no effort to verify Mansour's claims or ascertain Dillian Whyte's version of events.

For some reason, you've decided to change your tone... I wonder why?

[asdfjkl]

So I wrote, "if it's true" which is a kind of essential information in this matter, then...
Now you act like I'm taking his words for it, and because I'm not a coward I'm even willing to explain the logic behind it, somehow you then abuse that in such a way which makes it seem like I'm calling Whyte a coward.
If Mansour can back this up and Whyte can't get any better boxer, but will fight a lower ranked boxer, then it's easy to say Whyte himself ducked Mansour, but this is all referring to, "if it's true".

You have claimed that Dillian Whyte "ducked" Amir Mansour and also accused him of being a "coward" in this thread numerous times.

You then received criticism from multiple forum members for your casual and excessive use of terms like "duck" and "coward" without performing your due diligence, since you made no effort to verify Mansour's claims or ascertain Dillian Whyte's version of events.

For some reason, you've decided to change your tone... I wonder why?

:s Read my first post again and think again...

It's not editted, it's still exactly the same post.

[Enlightened-One]

You have claimed that Dillian Whyte "ducked" Amir Mansour and also accused him of being a "coward" in this thread numerous times.

You then received criticism from multiple forum members for your casual and excessive use of terms like "duck" and "coward" without performing your due diligence, since you made no effort to verify Mansour's claims or ascertain Dillian Whyte's version of events.

For some reason, you've decided to change your tone... I wonder why?

:s Read my first post again and think again...

It's not editted, it's still exactly the same post.

My interpretation of your opinion of the Whyte-Mansour situation is based on several of your quotes:

Hello Dillian Whyte, if it's true, I do think Whyte is a coward and yes, I'm following Mansour for quite a while now and didn't know this.

Did you actually read what Mansour said?

“Then we tried to get a match in August with Dillian Whyte on the Terence Crawford card in Omaha. That went nowhere. Top Rank told us that Whyte wanted to fight a tall, right-handed guy. What a joke!”

Wilder says no, the other guys most likely say no, Mansour clearly says yes and still Whyte seems to move on? That's or a duck

The only thing I notice is that I was right, the more I hear, the more proof I get.

I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour...

So you call Mansour a lier?

You claimed that Dillian Whyte “ducked” Amir Mansour and also accused the Brit of being a “coward”, without possesing any evidence whatsoever.

Do you have short-term memory issues?

[Taansend]

You have claimed that Dillian Whyte "ducked" Amir Mansour and also accused him of being a "coward" in this thread numerous times.

You then received criticism from multiple forum members for your casual and excessive use of terms like "duck" and "coward" without performing your due diligence, since you made no effort to verify Mansour's claims or ascertain Dillian Whyte's version of events.

For some reason, you've decided to change your tone... I wonder why?

:s Read my first post again and think again...

It's not editted, it's still exactly the same post.

My interpretation of your opinion of the Whyte-Mansour situation is based on several of your quotes:

Hello Dillian Whyte, if it's true, I do think Whyte is a coward and yes, I'm following Mansour for quite a while now and didn't know this.

Did you actually read what Mansour said?

“Then we tried to get a match in August with Dillian Whyte on the Terence Crawford card in Omaha. That went nowhere. Top Rank told us that Whyte wanted to fight a tall, right-handed guy. What a joke!”

Wilder says no, the other guys most likely say no, Mansour clearly says yes and still Whyte seems to move on? That's or a duck

The only thing I notice is that I was right, the more I hear, the more proof I get.

I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour...

So you call Mansour a lier?

You claimed that Dillian Whyte “ducked” Amir Mansour and also accused the Brit of being a “coward”, without possesing any evidence whatsoever.

Do you have short-term memory issues?

Bless his cotton socks. He's been caught out AGAIN

[asdfjkl]

You have claimed that Dillian Whyte "ducked" Amir Mansour and also accused him of being a "coward" in this thread numerous times.

You then received criticism from multiple forum members for your casual and excessive use of terms like "duck" and "coward" without performing your due diligence, since you made no effort to verify Mansour's claims or ascertain Dillian Whyte's version of events.

For some reason, you've decided to change your tone... I wonder why?

:s Read my first post again and think again...

It's not editted, it's still exactly the same post.

My interpretation of your opinion of the Whyte-Mansour situation is based on several of your quotes:

Hello Dillian Whyte, if it's true, I do think Whyte is a coward and yes, I'm following Mansour for quite a while now and didn't know this.

Did you actually read what Mansour said?

“Then we tried to get a match in August with Dillian Whyte on the Terence Crawford card in Omaha. That went nowhere. Top Rank told us that Whyte wanted to fight a tall, right-handed guy. What a joke!”

Wilder says no, the other guys most likely say no, Mansour clearly says yes and still Whyte seems to move on? That's or a duck

The only thing I notice is that I was right, the more I hear, the more proof I get.

I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

So again, why are you calling Dillian Whyte a Coward?

Because he ducked Mansour...

So you call Mansour a lier?

You claimed that Dillian Whyte “ducked” Amir Mansour and also accused the Brit of being a “coward”, without possesing any evidence whatsoever.

Do you have short-term memory issues?

You're basically proving me right? And yet claim to understand the opposite :s?

[Enlightened-One]

:s Read my first post again and think again...

It's not editted, it's still exactly the same post.

My interpretation of your opinion of the Whyte-Mansour situation is based on several of your quotes:

Hello Dillian Whyte, if it's true, I do think Whyte is a coward and yes, I'm following Mansour for quite a while now and didn't know this.

Did you actually read what Mansour said?

“Then we tried to get a match in August with Dillian Whyte on the Terence Crawford card in Omaha. That went nowhere. Top Rank told us that Whyte wanted to fight a tall, right-handed guy. What a joke!”

Wilder says no, the other guys most likely say no, Mansour clearly says yes and still Whyte seems to move on? That's or a duck

The only thing I notice is that I was right, the more I hear, the more proof I get.

I prefere to be honest, if you only accept fights you can't lose, while having the biggest talks out there,! then you're a coward, that's just the way it is.

Because he ducked Mansour...

So you call Mansour a lier?

You claimed that Dillian Whyte “ducked” Amir Mansour and also accused the Brit of being a “coward”, without possesing any evidence whatsoever.

Do you have short-term memory issues?

You're basically proving me right? And yet claim to understand the opposite :s?

How does me quoting your own words )that you actually deny) prove you right?

[asdfjkl]

My interpretation of your opinion of the Whyte-Mansour situation is based on several of your quotes:

You claimed that Dillian Whyte “ducked” Amir Mansour and also accused the Brit of being a “coward”, without possesing any evidence whatsoever.

Do you have short-term memory issues?

You're basically proving me right? And yet claim to understand the opposite :s?

How does me quoting your own words )that you actually deny) prove you right?

"If that's true", you literally qoute it from me yourself? What part of what you read do you not understand? You can't continue to act like I said anything wrong or contradicting at all lol.

[Taansend]

You're basically proving me right? And yet claim to understand the opposite :s?

How does me quoting your own words )that you actually deny) prove you right?

"If that's true", you literally qoute it from me yourself? What part of what you read do you not understand? You can't continue to act like I said anything wrong or contradicting at all lol.

Mate, you should leave. You're not doing yourself any favours. You accuse boxers of being cowards, then you backtrack & say you don't believe 100% of boxers but the boxer you've called a coward is because you've believed a non story by a boxer.

Just chill, son. You've admitted you're not a boxer except for some gay school games. And I mean gay as in playful. You've never been to a top fight but you call fighters "cowards".

Just quit

[asdfjkl]

How does me quoting your own words )that you actually deny) prove you right?

"If that's true", you literally qoute it from me yourself? What part of what you read do you not understand? You can't continue to act like I said anything wrong or contradicting at all lol.

Mate, you should leave. You're not doing yourself any favours. You accuse boxers of being cowards, then you backtrack & say you don't believe 100% of boxers but the boxer you've called a coward is because you've believed a non story by a boxer.

Just chill, son. You've admitted you're not a boxer except for some gay school games. And I mean gay as in playful. You've never been to a top fight but you call fighters "cowards".

Just quit

Like you have fought Mike Tyson lol, and I've written "if that's true" from start of.

[asdfjkl]

Well, if it's true, then Whyte is clearly a coward.

[Ruthless-RKO]

I'd much rather have seen Whyte vs. Mansour.. Michael Grant hasn't even had a decent win..

[Taansend]

Well, if it's true, then Whyte is clearly a coward.

Internet Warrior

[asdfjkl]

Well, if it's true, then Whyte is clearly a coward.

Internet Warrior

Well, Mansour is willing, is ranked quite high in the belts both boxers are boxing for, will give a lot more viewers and is similar aged. The only bad side about him is that he might be a risk. So the only reason to avoid Mansour out there is fear.

[gilgamesh]

There are several that could take him up on his challenge and beat him. They should. Most Heavyweights don't have a name as respectable as Amir Mansour on their record.