Page 3 of 3
Re: WILDER 6-5 over KING KONG ORTIZ---too hi
Posted: 16 Sep 2017, 02:54
by candyslim
Badhusker wrote:
I could be wrong but I don't remember Ortiz ever being a mandatory for Wilder.
I believe Wilder has only had one mandatory since becoming champion in January 2015 and that was Stiverne. It feels like he's been the mandatory for two of those years
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
. Thank the lord we might finally be free of him if Dominic lives up to (my) expectation.
Re: WILDER 6-5 over KING KONG ORTIZ---too hi
Posted: 16 Sep 2017, 04:25
by geronimo
When we talk about Wilder, we don't know exactly how his good: he faced weak opponents, the only decent fights are Stiverne and Scott. By the other side, his opponent, is a 38 years old man, he has good skills, but, even his opponents have been not too good... Difficult to say is going to win.
Re: WILDER 6-5 over KING KONG ORTIZ---too hi
Posted: 16 Sep 2017, 05:18
by candyslim
Many would question Scott's credentials. He's not exactly a man willing to go to hell and back to get the win is he?
His punch resistance is less than awe-inspiring too, although he's a good boxer.
I agree it's a tough fight to call. The ones worth looking forward to generally are.