Page 3 of 3

Re: Muhammad Ali, a different?

Posted: 20 Jan 2018, 20:50
by MrGuy
Kalan wrote: 20 Jan 2018, 13:08
MrGuy wrote: 19 Jan 2018, 20:24 You're right. It was probably more than that. He got decked early in his career so he was hittable his whole career? Doesn't work that way. Ali received very little punishment before his suspension. Wlad hit hard. Just not as hard as Foreman. Foreman vs Grimsley was old Foreman. His opponents were bigger just not better. Foreman doesn't get taken out by Sanders, Brewster, and Purrity. Young did get ko'd in his prime. By a guy named Earnie Shavers. Young beat Foreman and Lyle. Lost and had a draw with Shavers. Lost close to Ali and Norton. Wlad fought nobody in those guys class. A new heavy thats never beat anyone like Joshua, you need to quit hyping up
It was a lot less than 135 and you know it... Ali grabbed and held more times in the Frazier rematch.

And stop hyping up feather hitting Jimmy Young!!!! Young boxed the ass off Foreman but LOST 3 out of his next 4 fights including 2 losses to neophyte Ossie Ocasio... ALL Young had to do was beat greenie Cruiserweight Ossie Ocasio (10 wins) once in 2 tries to get a Title Fight with Heavyweight Champion Larry Holmes - and he fell through his ass both times...

They were billed as an elimination fights so they had no choice but to match Holmes with Ocasio… Holmes out-punched Ocasio 5 to 1, knocked him down with jabs, and knocked him out almost as easily as he vanquished Marvis Frazier – after Marvis beat up pathetic punching bag Joe Bugner, who was more hittable than Chuvalo.

Povetkin was far above the powerless, pitiful, and hittable Young... Povetkin had a stellar amateur career, won the Olympic Heavyweight Championship Gold Medal, out-boxed Chris Byrd and Eddie Chambers when he had only a few pro fights... knocked out top contender Carlos Takam, and took out super tough top contender Mike Perez in the 1st round... Povetkin is almost 39 and he’s only lost 1 fight to ATG Wladimir Klitschko... You simply hate Eastern Europeans,. You give them no credit whatever.

Wladimir was a great athlete ... but not a natural boxer with inbred fistic instincts like Vitali... WK needed a great trainer like Emmanuel Stewart to be any good. Wlad won the Olympic Heavyweight Championship on sheer size, strength, and punching power. He had no stance, jab, footwork, or timing until many years later when he got with Steward.

He turned pro at 20 and fought Puritty at 22.. He had the flu and weighed in really light at 224.. He was outweighed by 25 pounds.. He never weighed within 10 pounds of that light weight afterwards so he didn’t catch the technical problems he had. He thought it was the weight and lack of strength because he was winning every round on points til he gassed out. The Sanders fight there were no such excuses like that, because he couldn’t stop the left hand bombs... Sanders found a huge hole in his defense.

Wladimir knew he had serious problems and called Emmanuel Steward... In 3 years he was a completely retooled Heavyweight and held the Heavyweight Championship for going on 11 years, beating more southpaws than any other Heavyweight Champion... Steward pulled his stance in, brought his head back, dropped his guard down appropriately, sharpened his sloppy footwork, closed holes in his defense, and perfected his jab, straight right, and left hook.

Steward was not an infighting specialist, or a body attack guy. But he was the best ever with tall rangy boxers who had good speed and smarts. Manny had them tie up opponents on the inside because he knew most referees would say “Stop punching. Break” and physically break you so that you can reset from the outside... Grabbing and wrestling isn’t Marquis of Queensberry but everyone gets away with it... I would tell refs “Half our game is infighting. Tell that MFer to let go when he grabs and stop breaking them. Call time and take points for holding if he doesn’t let go on command.” Some refs listen, but most don’t. You can bitch your ass off and it’s like talking to a wall.
Young doesn't need hyed up. Beating Foreman and Lyle while drawung with Shavers speaks for itself. Not to mention close losses to Ali and Norton. His career went in the tank. Probably should've retired. Ali lost to Spinks after he had been around a couple of decades. Wlads retooled game was clinching to stop all offense.

Re: Muhammad Ali, a different?

Posted: 21 Jan 2018, 02:23
by Kalan
golden oldie wrote: 20 Jan 2018, 23:05 that guy was virtually untouchable, and when he did get touched
Unbeatable and virtually untouchable eh Old-N-Moldie? -- except when he got touched. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Then you say Lewis might have beaten the unbeatable man : :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You pick a very select 4-year period during which Ali fought only 1 outstanding Heavyweight – the aging Sonny Liston – who saw only 3 shortened rounds of ring action during the previous 35.5 months, so obviously not at his sharpest... But he held Ali even on the scorecards through 6 rounds - even though he was suffering from a torn left shoulder and biceps to where 8 doctors testified he would not be able to continue with such a severe injury.

And in the rematch Ali could easily have been disqualified -- for failure to comply with the referee's commands to go to a neutral corner for the ENTIRE COUNT!!! .... Therefore Liston did NOT get a count.. The referee and both fighters believed the fight was still on when he got up... As Liston and Ali resumed boxing, referee Walcott (without calling time), walked over to discuss the matter with Nat Fleischer who was not a boxing official, but told Walcott to stop the fight in Ali’s favor.

Of course, entering that period Clay came off a fight where he was decked hard by 185-pound Henry Cooper with 3 seconds left in the 4th round... YOU claim if that punch landed earlier in the round Cooper would have finished Clay off.... So you think Clay was beatable then -- but suddenly in his next fight he becomes unbeatable. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Muhammad Ali, a different?

Posted: 21 Jan 2018, 05:13
by MrGuy
Kalan wrote: 20 Jan 2018, 13:08
MrGuy wrote: 19 Jan 2018, 20:24 You're right. It was probably more than that. He got decked early in his career so he was hittable his whole career? Doesn't work that way. Ali received very little punishment before his suspension. Wlad hit hard. Just not as hard as Foreman. Foreman vs Grimsley was old Foreman. His opponents were bigger just not better. Foreman doesn't get taken out by Sanders, Brewster, and Purrity. Young did get ko'd in his prime. By a guy named Earnie Shavers. Young beat Foreman and Lyle. Lost and had a draw with Shavers. Lost close to Ali and Norton. Wlad fought nobody in those guys class. A new heavy thats never beat anyone like Joshua, you need to quit hyping up
It was a lot less than 135 and you know it... Ali grabbed and held more times in the Frazier rematch.

And stop hyping up feather hitting Jimmy Young!!!! Young boxed the ass off Foreman but LOST 3 out of his next 4 fights including 2 losses to neophyte Ossie Ocasio... ALL Young had to do was beat greenie Cruiserweight Ossie Ocasio (10 wins) once in 2 tries to get a Title Fight with Heavyweight Champion Larry Holmes - and he fell through his ass both times...

They were billed as an elimination fights so they had no choice but to match Holmes with Ocasio… Holmes out-punched Ocasio 5 to 1, knocked him down with jabs, and knocked him out almost as easily as he vanquished Marvis Frazier – after Marvis beat up pathetic punching bag Joe Bugner, who was more hittable than Chuvalo.

Povetkin was far above the powerless, pitiful, and hittable Young... Povetkin had a stellar amateur career, won the Olympic Heavyweight Championship Gold Medal, out-boxed Chris Byrd and Eddie Chambers when he had only a few pro fights... knocked out top contender Carlos Takam, and took out super tough top contender Mike Perez in the 1st round... Povetkin is almost 39 and he’s only lost 1 fight to ATG Wladimir Klitschko... You simply hate Eastern Europeans,. You give them no credit whatever.

Wladimir was a great athlete ... but not a natural boxer with inbred fistic instincts like Vitali... WK needed a great trainer like Emmanuel Stewart to be any good. Wlad won the Olympic Heavyweight Championship on sheer size, strength, and punching power. He had no stance, jab, footwork, or timing until many years later when he got with Steward.

He turned pro at 20 and fought Puritty at 22.. He had the flu and weighed in really light at 224.. He was outweighed by 25 pounds.. He never weighed within 10 pounds of that light weight afterwards so he didn’t catch the technical problems he had. He thought it was the weight and lack of strength because he was winning every round on points til he gassed out. The Sanders fight there were no such excuses like that, because he couldn’t stop the left hand bombs... Sanders found a huge hole in his defense.

Wladimir knew he had serious problems and called Emmanuel Steward... In 3 years he was a completely retooled Heavyweight and held the Heavyweight Championship for going on 11 years, beating more southpaws than any other Heavyweight Champion... Steward pulled his stance in, brought his head back, dropped his guard down appropriately, sharpened his sloppy footwork, closed holes in his defense, and perfected his jab, straight right, and left hook.

Steward was not an infighting specialist, or a body attack guy. But he was the best ever with tall rangy boxers who had good speed and smarts. Manny had them tie up opponents on the inside because he knew most referees would say “Stop punching. Break” and physically break you so that you can reset from the outside... Grabbing and wrestling isn’t Marquis of Queensberry but everyone gets away with it... I would tell refs “Half our game is infighting. Tell that MFer to let go when he grabs and stop breaking them. Call time and take points for holding if he doesn’t let go on command.” Some refs listen, but most don’t. You can bitch your ass off and it’s like talking to a wall.

Re: Muhammad Ali, a different?

Posted: 21 Jan 2018, 15:05
by Cojimar 1946
I think guys like Joshua and Wlad could pose serious problems for 60s Ali. Ali is not used to going up against significantly larger men with such power and skillsets.

Re: Muhammad Ali, a different?

Posted: 21 Jan 2018, 15:11
by Cojimar 1946
Aside from Sonny Liston, Ali's competition in the 60s was not terribly impressive and some of them managed to win rounds and make Ali uncomfortable. There are other guys that would be favored to make a similar sweep of such competition. I don't see any of them except possibly Liston posing any problem for Tyson or Lewis for example.

Re: Muhammad Ali, a different?

Posted: 21 Jan 2018, 15:30
by Kalan
Old-N-Moldie, you're too much of an idiot to be capable of any research. You make up your own mind what happened like a typical Nixon or Trump voter would... Here a typical story on Liston's extremely well documented injury.

https://archive.org/stream/CharlesSonny ... 3_djvu.txt

It notes that although 8 different doctors testified to Liston's injury as being severe, the overly suspicious commission held up Liston's paycheck until it had it's own doctor examine Liston...
At ' St. Francis Hospital, a tense crowd of fight officials
and close followers of the fighters awaited Liston’s arrival and
exapiination. The Miami Ber?:h
Bojfeng Commission ordered (lis
puiBe withheld until the regprt
wai made.

After hours of waiting, Dr. j
Alexander Robbins, chief physi- ’
cian for the commission, report-
ed that the injury to Liston’s
shoulder "would be sufficient to
incapacitate him and prevent
him from defending himself,’ 1

The 5O-year-old fallen cham-
pion "suffered the injury to the
loig head of the biceps tefdon
o| the left shoulder
In the rematch, Walcott never succeeded in wrestling the much younger Ali to a neutral corner you insane jackass.... Since Liston NEVER got a count, because Walcott was trying to make Ali comply with his ignored commands, the rules state the count should have been SUSPENDED.... Walcott was well within his rights to DQ Ali for his defiant conduct.

Walcott, Ali, and Liston all thought the fight was still on when Liston got up.... The 2 combatants resumed fighting while the referee walked over to talk to Nat Fleischer (without calling time)... Had Fleischer---who was not a boxing official---not interfered, I'm certain the fight would have continued... Ali missed all his follow up punches... Liston easily slipped and ducked them showing his reflexes were intact... He was obviously not hurt by the knockdown punch.