BoxRec

Posted: **12 Oct 2017, 08:49**

candyslim wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
candyslim wrote:Tony I don't expect you to waste your time wading through my posting history, but I assure you I have never believed it unequivocally, it was always a theory to cover the niggling doubts that I found difficulty getting reconciled to. I did chide Saad on more than one occasion for his refusal to acknowledge even a miniscule possibility that there was more to this than Haymon/Sulaiman were wanting us to believe.

Confronted with such categoric denial might have made me argue the case with more conviction than I possessed. It wasn't that he didn't believe it, it was the dogmatic 'you're stupid for even considering the possibility attitude' that was getting my back up ...like Sulaiman and Haymon are such paragons of virtue.

I don't ask you to accept it. Your keeping an open mind will do just fine.

Ok, are you going to take on montrealsuper's dogmatism above?
I think I've made my thoughts on the subject pretty clear.

You hadn't until now. Now I know you agree w/ montrealsuper's views above.

Posted: **12 Oct 2017, 09:03**

Tony that isn't true but to be honest I'm getting a bit fed up with raking it over and over. I have probably typed more words on this subject than most and it's clear that I'm pissing into the wind.

Besides that it doesn't look like there's any shortage of people lining up to crap on the theory so nobody needs me joining in to give the man a kicking.

Posted: **12 Oct 2017, 10:00**

Anyone that actively endorses the claims articulated by montrealsuper clearly has mental capacity issues.

Posted: **12 Oct 2017, 10:03**

Enlightened-One wrote:Anyone that actively endorses the claims articulated by montrealsuper clearly has mental capacity issues.

Montrealsuper hates Haymon and Wilder.

Why though? It's such a big mystery.

BoxRec

Stiverne

Re: Stiverne

Re: Stiverne

Re: Stiverne

Re: Stiverne