Re: British fighters that didn't win world titles
Posted: 18 Oct 2017, 00:42
Crawford Ashley
Didn't he win a version of a world title but was stripped?stujones wrote:Of more recent times Damean Kelly.... cracking stylist - a bit shocking that he only had one shot of the title against Paccheco in Columbia (if memory serves).
that loss to jorrin was a stinker.Nightmare Roy wrote:Michael Brodie
Now that would have been a great fight. If only Clinton hadn't got disqualified against Gambini.paddy chavez wrote:Clinton McKenzie was in line to fight Roger Mayweather if I remember rightly a winnable fight for Clinton
tbh didnt think he was hard done by on the cards once. best case for a title was huck 2 but even that wasnt a robbery. couldve easily lost that. seems like a race obsessed weirdo going by his social media but dont know him personally.TopGun wrote:Ola Afolabi - nice guy and hard done by a few times.
Not seen his social media, he got a massive chip on his shoulder has he. Shamejamamb wrote:tbh didnt think he was hard done by on the cards once. best case for a title was huck 2 but even that wasnt a robbery. couldve easily lost that. seems like a race obsessed weirdo going by his social media but dont know him personally.TopGun wrote:Ola Afolabi - nice guy and hard done by a few times.
Yes, Dodson was a superb talent thrown in too deep, too soon against Ronald Wright and it ruined him.Noxy wrote:I always thought Adrian Dodson would win a title. Colin Jones came close too. Sammy Reeson, Macklin ...
agreedMatt W wrote:I remember watching Hardy vs Canizales at Sunderland as a kid and thought Billy got robbed.
Rob McCracken.
Good pick. Bunny dished out a real beating to Maurice Hope when Hope moved up to middleweight to challenge him. This was before Hope won the WBC light-middleweight title so it holds up as a great win for Sterling. Bunny's problem was that he faded down the stretch of 15-rounders. Over 12 rounds he was excellent.Grant wrote:Bunny Sterling. Ranked #1 Middle Contender by 'Ring' at one stage from memory.
Clinton was definitely lined up to fight Johnny Bumphus for the title. Mickey Duff had a verbal agreement with the Duvas but Bumphus then got done by Gene Hatcher.olij999 wrote:Now that would have been a great fight. If only Clinton hadn't got disqualified against Gambini.paddy chavez wrote:Clinton McKenzie was in line to fight Roger Mayweather if I remember rightly a winnable fight for Clinton
That Leonard Ko though !!!!!Talkischeap wrote:Dave Boy Green

Wharton stopped Close in one round in an England v Ireland international.Autobarn wrote:I don’t think Close beat Eubank. I had the first 6-6 with late drama, Eubank salvaging his title with the knockdown, making up somewhat for earlier time wasting tactics of going walkabout and ignoring the actual fight. Close was impressive, nonetheless, in two spirited fights.
In the second, Eubank’s body punching was underrated somewhat and he scored many good uppercuts. The second fight is actually a very good fight, the one successful WBO defense that perhaps required the most work as it went all the way. It certainly demonstrated all of Eubank’s strengths - his immense size and power at the weight - and weakenesses - limited stamina from making the weight too long...
Close performed very well in both fights, clearly following the Watson blueprint of forcing Eubank into a pace he’s not comfortable with. In the Watson epic Eubank had debuted at the weight (168) whereas versus Close he’d been grinding down for years. Close was very tidy, busy and compact and I feel the draw result in the first fight was more than fair to him. That Eubank uppercut which scored the knockdown was a truly beautiful shot. He’d been trying it all night and Close leaned straight into this one.
For me, the strong finishes, that sudden surge of late power, retained the title for Eubank - with a draw and narrow win - both times.
I believe Wharton was regarded as better than Close, and so Eubank’s acclaimed performance against Wharton could be seen as “making up” for the Close fights. Eubank, for all his faults, fought EVERY top Brit or Celt during a very strong era of people from these countries! (Add the two with Carl Thompson at cruiserweight as well) A shame Close didn’t fight some of the other world class super middleweights. He seemed to disappear off the scene, though not as abruptly as Dave Tiberi, whom many feel was robbed against James Toney, down at 160. I am genuinely intrigued what Close and Tiberi were capable of against other top fighters. Eubank and Toney did kind of make them look like Jake Lamotta, Gene Fullmer or Carmen Basilio LOL!
Aye, Ray "Nothing Comes" Close was quality. He failed a brain scan in the run up to Close vs Eubank 3 and lost his licence. I was at Close vs Eubank 2, the atmosphere was something else, it was a cauldron. Chris loved it, strutting round the ring as he used to do.Autobarn wrote:I don’t think Close beat Eubank. I had the first 6-6 with late drama, Eubank salvaging his title with the knockdown, making up somewhat for earlier time wasting tactics of going walkabout and ignoring the actual fight. Close was impressive, nonetheless, in two spirited fights.
In the second, Eubank’s body punching was underrated somewhat and he scored many good uppercuts. The second fight is actually a very good fight, the one successful WBO defense that perhaps required the most work as it went all the way. It certainly demonstrated all of Eubank’s strengths - his immense size and power at the weight - and weakenesses - limited stamina from making the weight too long...
Close performed very well in both fights, clearly following the Watson blueprint of forcing Eubank into a pace he’s not comfortable with. In the Watson epic Eubank had debuted at the weight (168) whereas versus Close he’d been grinding down for years. Close was very tidy, busy and compact and I feel the draw result in the first fight was more than fair to him. That Eubank uppercut which scored the knockdown was a truly beautiful shot. He’d been trying it all night and Close leaned straight into this one.
For me, the strong finishes, that sudden surge of late power, retained the title for Eubank - with a draw and narrow win - both times.
I believe Wharton was regarded as better than Close, and so Eubank’s acclaimed performance against Wharton could be seen as “making up” for the Close fights. Eubank, for all his faults, fought EVERY top Brit or Celt during a very strong era of people from these countries! (Add the two with Carl Thompson at cruiserweight as well) A shame Close didn’t fight some of the other world class super middleweights. He seemed to disappear off the scene, though not as abruptly as Dave Tiberi, whom many feel was robbed against James Toney, down at 160. I am genuinely intrigued what Close and Tiberi were capable of against other top fighters. Eubank and Toney did kind of make them look like Jake Lamotta, Gene Fullmer or Carmen Basilio LOL!