BoxRec

This fight just feels hollow to me now.

Autobarn wrote:

Tanzio wrote:How did Pulev hurt his shoulder, putting too much effort into spinning his squeeze?

He never wanted the fight.

German based fighters never want to come over here. Going back to Denis Lebedev pulling out of a vacant title fight with Carl Froch in Nottingham. Did anyone think Pulev would go through with it?

Too much money on he table for him to just not fancy it and pull out...

I agree this is actually a more interesting fight than the original.

Takam will likely go more rounds than Pulev would have and will at least try and rough AJ up, rather than Pulev standing straight up trying to box and hopelessly f(l)ailing.

Riddick Blowe wrote:I agree this is actually a more interesting fight than the original.

Takam will likely go more rounds than Pulev would have and will at least try and rough AJ up, rather than Pulev standing straight up trying to box and hopelessly f(l)ailing.

I heard Hearn say exactly the same thing the other day.
How is "Takam will go more rounds" a selling point?
It is a forgone conclusion he will beat both, why people arw travelling to Cardiff to watch this dross is beyond me...

A year ago, on full notice, I would have quite liked this fight for Joshua. Now, just feels a bit of a damp squib. The rest of the card is all a bit meh too. PPV baby

wesshaw1985 wrote: How is "Takam will go more rounds" a selling point?

more boxing to see.

Takam will take it to him because he has a better style for pressure than Pulev.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote: How is "Takam will go more rounds" a selling point?

more boxing to see.

Takam will take it to him because he has a better style for pressure than Pulev.

more boxing to see but we all know who the winner will be.
Do not buy this PPV. Do not line Hearns and AJs pockets for a fight where we already know the outcome.
This should be a Saturday fight night main event nothing more...

wesshaw1985 wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote: How is "Takam will go more rounds" a selling point?

more boxing to see.

Takam will take it to him because he has a better style for pressure than Pulev.

more boxing to see but we all know who the winner will be.
Do not buy this PPV. Do not line Hearns and AJs pockets for a fight where we already know the outcome.
This should be a Saturday fight night main event nothing more...

We will 'all know who the winner will be' for nearly all of Joshua's fights from this point onwards. He's a step above everyone else. Folks might argue Wilder, but I believe Deontay gets blown away.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:
more boxing to see.

Takam will take it to him because he has a better style for pressure than Pulev.

more boxing to see but we all know who the winner will be.
Do not buy this PPV. Do not line Hearns and AJs pockets for a fight where we already know the outcome.
This should be a Saturday fight night main event nothing more...

We will 'all know who the winner will be' for nearly all of Joshua's fights from this point onwards. He's a step above everyone else. Folks might argue Wilder, but I believe Deontay gets blown away.

difference being Wilder and Parker are undefeated champ vs. champ.
Takam is a replacement for a mandatory.
Linares vs. Crolla was on regular sky...

wesshaw1985 wrote:difference being Wilder and Parker are undefeated champ vs. champ.
Takam is a replacement for a mandatory.
Linares vs. Crolla was on regular sky...

Where do I get Sky for free?

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:difference being Wilder and Parker are undefeated champ vs. champ.
Takam is a replacement for a mandatory.
Linares vs. Crolla was on regular sky...

Where do I get Sky for free?

#TeamStream

wesshaw1985 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:difference being Wilder and Parker are undefeated champ vs. champ.
Takam is a replacement for a mandatory.
Linares vs. Crolla was on regular sky...

Where do I get Sky for free?

#TeamStream

I want to watch the fight with my mates on my massive TV, not hunched around some laptop like a gimp.

wesshaw1985 wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote: How is "Takam will go more rounds" a selling point?

more boxing to see.

Takam will take it to him because he has a better style for pressure than Pulev.

more boxing to see but we all know who the winner will be.
Do not buy this PPV. Do not line Hearns and AJs pockets for a fight where we already know the outcome.
This should be a Saturday fight night main event nothing more...

We all are wrong all the time.

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:
Where do I get Sky for free?

#TeamStream

I want to watch the fight with my mates on my massive TV, not hunched around some laptop like a gimp.

massive TV?!?! what a baller...

wesshaw1985 wrote:massive TV?!?! what a baller...

Well I didn't buy it to watch neighbours whilst sitting around my laptop like a gimp watching a flickering video of the fight.

The issue people seem to constantly miss about PPV is that sticking it on standard Sky cuts out millions of people who would pay £20 for the fight between them and their mates but wouldn't shell out for standard Sky. I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact.

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:massive TV?!?! what a baller...

Well I didn't buy it to watch neighbours whilst sitting around my laptop like a gimp watching a flickering video of the fight.

The issue people seem to constantly miss about PPV is that sticking it on standard Sky cuts out millions of people who would pay £20 for the fight between them and their mates but wouldn't shell out for standard Sky. I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact.

1 day Now TV Sky Sports pass. £6.99.

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:massive TV?!?! what a baller...

Well I didn't buy it to watch neighbours whilst sitting around my laptop like a gimp watching a flickering video of the fight.

The issue people seem to constantly miss about PPV is that sticking it on standard Sky cuts out millions of people who would pay £20 for the fight between them and their mates but wouldn't shell out for standard Sky. I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact.

get a better stream then you goof.
Link your laptop to your "massive TV" and watch it for free. Its a very easy process for anybody with half a brain.
Sticking it on PPV allows Hearn and AJ to milk the casual audience of millions for a dud fight, I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact...

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:massive TV?!?! what a baller...

Well I didn't buy it to watch neighbours whilst sitting around my laptop like a gimp watching a flickering video of the fight.

The issue people seem to constantly miss about PPV is that sticking it on standard Sky cuts out millions of people who would pay £20 for the fight between them and their mates but wouldn't shell out for standard Sky. I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact.

Forks out on a massive TV for him and his mates to watch EastEnders as he cant afford sky

Spiker wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:massive TV?!?! what a baller...

Well I didn't buy it to watch neighbours whilst sitting around my laptop like a gimp watching a flickering video of the fight.

The issue people seem to constantly miss about PPV is that sticking it on standard Sky cuts out millions of people who would pay £20 for the fight between them and their mates but wouldn't shell out for standard Sky. I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact.

Forks out on a massive TV for him and his mates to watch EastEnders as he cant afford sky

Tread very carefully, lads, this guy stalks me for disagreeing with him.

wesshaw1985 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:massive TV?!?! what a baller...

Well I didn't buy it to watch neighbours whilst sitting around my laptop like a gimp watching a flickering video of the fight.

The issue people seem to constantly miss about PPV is that sticking it on standard Sky cuts out millions of people who would pay £20 for the fight between them and their mates but wouldn't shell out for standard Sky. I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact.

get a better stream then you goof.
Link your laptop to your "massive TV" and watch it for free. Its a very easy process for anybody with half a brain.
Sticking it on PPV allows Hearn and AJ to milk the casual audience of millions for a dud fight, I genuinely don't understand how people seem to miss this plainly obvious fact...

Streams still aren't reliable and I don't want to miss the fight. I won't miss the money hence I'll pay it.

If Hughie is a tenner, and Groves Cox is a tenner, then the best heavyweight in the world is going to be PPV. People moaning about PPV in boxing is dull as feck - nothing is going to change and it's been that way for decades. Suggesting that Hughie Parker will bomb on PPV (which it did) is fine, but why people question Joshua on the same platform just reveals their lack of basic economic sense.

Good luck to Takam.

The fights that matter for Joshua are...

Wilder
Povetkin
Ortiz

These interest me the others not really...

Fury and Haye are finished at the top level.

dirk2686 wrote:nothing is going to change and it's been that way for decades.

http://www.skysports.com/joshua/news/34644/11090058/1

Eddie Hearn expects Anthony Joshua to be leaner and meaner for his world title fight against Carlos Takam on October 28, live on Sky Sports Box Office

Anthony Joshua could be a stone lighter for his world title fight against Carlos Takam and will have extra speed and spite, says promoter Eddie Hearn.

The WBA 'super' and IBF champion has undergone a lengthy training camp ahead of his next title defence, with Takam replacing the injured Kubrat Pulev as his opponent in Cardiff on October 28, live on Sky Sports Box Office.

oshua tipped the scales at 17st 12lbs 2oz, his career heaviest weight, for the back from the brink victory over Wladimir Klitschko at Wembley in April, and Hearn believes the champion's new-look leaner frame will produce an explosive performance.

"Josh is hitting very hard," Hearn told Sky Sports. "You're going to see him come in lighter in this fight.

"I think he could be 10 pounds, even a stone lighter than he was in the Klitschko fight.

"You're going to see him extra fast, with extra spite. As far as I'm concerned the most exciting fighter in world boxing, ready to do the business next Saturday."

There's no point complaining about PPV when you bought khan Salita etc like most on here. Most boxing fans will buy whatever is put in front of them. That's why they had the audacity to put hughie on PPV