Page 3 of 3

Re: Povetkin is so overrated

Posted: 26 Oct 2017, 01:49
by man
povetkin was a good name in a very
weak division. that division has been
improving and he's got older. he is
not spectacular, but he would have
been the first real "name" on the
wilder tour. that's all. aside of that
he is a hometown fighter soon to
be forgotten.

in terms of overrated, nobody wants
to see joshua fight him, which speaks
volumes.

Re: Povetkin is so overrated

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 03:12
by Marlo Stanfield
Tony1244 wrote:
Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:

Unless you have evidence, you're just guessing. I've found guessing to be counterproductive in all facets of life.
And you're just naive or lack knowledge on HGH if you look at AJs physique and think it's natural

Some pro wrestlers had that physique in 1960. Were they PED users? Were the Klitschkos PED users?

I thought the argument was that Joshua wasn't a real HW.
Can't comment on the pro wrestlers physiques in 1960 (however I doubt they had HGH gut like AJ does) but I can tell you the Klitschko brothers do not carry the same gut as AJ. They're leaner & more natural

Re: Povetkin is so overrated

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 09:27
by Tony1244
Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
Marlo Stanfield wrote:
And you're just naive or lack knowledge on HGH if you look at AJs physique and think it's natural

Some pro wrestlers had that physique in 1960. Were they PED users? Were the Klitschkos PED users?

I thought the argument was that Joshua wasn't a real HW.
Can't comment on the pro wrestlers physiques in 1960 (however I doubt they had HGH gut like AJ does) but I can tell you the Klitschko brothers do not carry the same gut as AJ. They're leaner & more natural

That may all be true. But if physiques were everything Frank Bruno would be one of the all time greats.

If you look like Chauncey Welliver, that's a problem. As long as you pass all the PED tests, it's irrelevant, to me at least, what the exact physique looks like.

Re: Povetkin is so overrated

Posted: 31 Oct 2017, 05:44
by Marlo Stanfield
Tony1244 wrote:
Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:

Some pro wrestlers had that physique in 1960. Were they PED users? Were the Klitschkos PED users?

I thought the argument was that Joshua wasn't a real HW.
Can't comment on the pro wrestlers physiques in 1960 (however I doubt they had HGH gut like AJ does) but I can tell you the Klitschko brothers do not carry the same gut as AJ. They're leaner & more natural

That may all be true. But if physiques were everything Frank Bruno would be one of the all time greats.

If you look like Chauncey Welliver, that's a problem. As long as you pass all the PED tests, it's irrelevant, to me at least, what the exact physique looks like.
He should sign up to VADA 365, not just being tested 16-20 weeks a year when he has a fight signed, IMO. But yes, having a great body doesn't mean you're a great boxer. In fairness, I think he's getting too big and it'll cost him if he doesn't lose some weight soon