Page 3 of 3
Re: is bjs the uks top boxer
Posted: 18 Dec 2017, 14:15
by paddy chavez
LancashireLoyal wrote: ↑18 Dec 2017, 12:58
Ive not read through this entire thread yet but if we are going to overlook Billys poor performance then surely we should be overlooking De Gales poor performance.
A 100% James De Gale is just slightly easier on the eye than a 100% Billy Joe,for me anyway.
Mixes it up a bit more goes to the body where Billy doesnt,not much between the footwork and movement.Bit more pop on his shots.
This is only going off both guys at their very best.
But surely you have to go on the most recent fights degale hasn't really looked great in a few fights whereas billy Joe has just had his best fight .
Re: is bjs the uks top boxer
Posted: 19 Dec 2017, 10:12
by jamamb
ya its not the same. i meant is he top now, and just did a masterclass while degale lost to a gatekeeper
Re: is bjs the uks top boxer
Posted: 19 Dec 2017, 10:19
by Oiky
On form, Bill is much better than DeGale
Re: could bjs be the uks top boxer
Posted: 19 Dec 2017, 11:25
by Andrew
closer wrote: ↑17 Dec 2017, 01:58
Akavov performance, you can even make a solid argument he lost that fight.
I thought he did 7-5. He was dire
Re: is bjs the uks top boxer
Posted: 19 Dec 2017, 11:26
by Andrew
Pugilist-specialist wrote: ↑17 Dec 2017, 06:27
KiwiRider wrote: ↑17 Dec 2017, 02:27
I still think after tonight that Eubank would beat him.
Come off it. Saunders beat him once and Eubank threw away the chance of a rematch.
Eubank doesn't fight at that weight anymore. If he chose to get off those extra 8lbs in weight BJS would ruin him.
I don't think anyone can judge how a rematch goes until after Eubank faces Groves.