Page 3 of 3
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 10 Jan 2018, 17:35
by Horse
thechump wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:32Well im not thick enough to put a fighter in that hasnt fought for 2 and a bit years and another fighter who hasnt foght since may 2016 am i,numb nuts
No, but you think that a fighter who hasn't fought in over 20 years is eligible.
Absolute moron!
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 10 Jan 2018, 17:48
by Mimmy
Horse wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:35
thechump wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:32Well im not thick enough to put a fighter in that hasnt fought for 2 and a bit years and another fighter who hasnt foght since may 2016 am i,numb nuts
No, but you think that a fighter who hasn't fought in over 20 years is eligible.
Absolute moron!
Without being pedantic Horse you said Fury was in your list because he's great so why cannot other people give other 'great' names to go in the list without you getting all stressed out? Its a simple enough request that should be honoured, purely on the 'great' factor you chose to use.
While your at it stick in Baz Mcguigan at around number 6 or 7.
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 03:40
by TheGman
Horse wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:35
thechump wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:32Well im not thick enough to put a fighter in that hasnt fought for 2 and a bit years and another fighter who hasnt foght since may 2016 am i,numb nuts
No, but you think that a fighter who hasn't fought in over 20 years is eligible.
Absolute moron!
Hahaha you are hilarious,always cheers me up comin on here and reading what you comment on,your so transparent its fckin hilarious.
Fury hasnt fought in two years khan hasnt fought for 18 months+ but they enter your december top 30 which has the top guy coming off a defeat then you say decembers results dont count hahahaha and you call me a moron? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously making decisions and posts like this horse?
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 04:38
by Boxerbeetle
thechump wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 03:40
Horse wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:35
thechump wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:32Well im not thick enough to put a fighter in that hasnt fought for 2 and a bit years and another fighter who hasnt foght since may 2016 am i,numb nuts
No, but you think that a fighter who hasn't fought in over 20 years is eligible.
Absolute moron!
Hahaha you are hilarious,always cheers me up comin on here and reading what you comment on,your so transparent its fckin hilarious.
Fury hasnt fought in two years khan hasnt fought for 18 months+ but they enter your december top 30 which has the top guy coming off a defeat then you say decembers results dont count hahahaha and you call me a moron? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously making decisions and posts like this horse?
Yes, it was a bit of a strange list last month
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 04:47
by Coco
mimmy123 wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:48
Horse wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:35
thechump wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:32Well im not thick enough to put a fighter in that hasnt fought for 2 and a bit years and another fighter who hasnt foght since may 2016 am i,numb nuts
No, but you think that a fighter who hasn't fought in over 20 years is eligible.
Absolute moron!
Without being pedantic Horse you said Fury was in your list because he's great so why cannot other people give other 'great' names to go in the list without you getting all stressed out? Its a simple enough request that should be honoured, purely on the 'great' factor you chose to use.
While your at it stick in Baz Mcguigan at around number 6 or 7.
No great fighter lost to Stevie Cruz
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 05:23
by TheGman
Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 04:38
thechump wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 03:40
Horse wrote: ↑10 Jan 2018, 17:35
No, but you think that a fighter who hasn't fought in over 20 years is eligible.
Absolute moron!
Hahaha you are hilarious,always cheers me up comin on here and reading what you comment on,your so transparent its fckin hilarious.
Fury hasnt fought in two years khan hasnt fought for 18 months+ but they enter your december top 30 which has the top guy coming off a defeat then you say decembers results dont count hahahaha and you call me a moron? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously making decisions and posts like this horse?
Yes, it was a bit of a strange list last month
Haha i know,the guy who is no1 is 4th in his weight class with everyone above him lower on horses "list" its comical
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 05:50
by Horse
thechump wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 05:23Haha i know,the guy who is no1 is 4th in his weight class with everyone above him lower on horses "list" its comical
Christ! Are you still going on?
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 06:04
by TheGman
Horse wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 05:50
thechump wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 05:23Haha i know,the guy who is no1 is 4th in his weight class with everyone above him lower on horses "list" its comical
Christ! Are you still going on?
Dont bring christ into it,you made the c0ck up not christ,and here is me thinking you were a smart man
Re: British Top 30 P4P December 2017
Posted: 13 Jan 2018, 07:08
by jamamb
why do these rankings cause some ppl to get so upset? sad almost