Page 3 of 5

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 10:59
by oogiebe
Boxerbeetle wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 10:55
bigjack wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 10:34 A true sign of a casual is they quite often pronounce boxers names wrong,i've heard Merryweather,Frock and Wetherspoon mentioned and usually in the wrong weight class too :lol:
Remember when Froch kept calling Spence ‘Spencer’ when he was commentating on the Brook fight?
Knowing Froch, it may have been on purpose if he didn't like Spence.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 15:45
by black panther
stujones wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 07:21 Having experienced a Joshua card live for the first (and probably only) time and up with the "casuals" - I can say they were as annoying as feck. Okay, I'm not expecting everyone to have encyclopedia knowledge of boxing - but when people were saying that Carlos Molina fought Anthony Joshua and this Kelly fella cannot be that good because Joshua stopped Molina it is pretty bad.

People were saying, in all seriousness, that Joshua is champion of the world cos Mayweather has retired - as if being champion of the world means exactly that - there is one world champion in the whole of boxing. When Ryan Burnett fought they thought it was a typo in the programme and that it must be an eliminator for Joshua.

Yeah the card wasn't exciting, but the amount of - Oh this is poo lets get a pint, lets go for a fag, I was hearing, even for Price vs Povetkin. Loads thought Bruno was Dillan White also.

I'll certainly never get the cheap seats again, not because of the view but because of the casuals - and quite possibly more than any sport, the casuals like to think they know everything about boxing.
:bow: :o

Sometimes I dream I have a stamp
with “YDKSAB” (you don’t know sh*t about boxing) and permanently stamp it on the foreheads of such people who claim to be experts in the sport.

There’s nothing wrong with being a casual. But there’s definitely something wrong with being a casual and thinking you are an expert/ have expert opinion on boxing.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 16:51
by stujones
black panther wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 15:45
stujones wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 07:21 Having experienced a Joshua card live for the first (and probably only) time and up with the "casuals" - I can say they were as annoying as feck. Okay, I'm not expecting everyone to have encyclopedia knowledge of boxing - but when people were saying that Carlos Molina fought Anthony Joshua and this Kelly fella cannot be that good because Joshua stopped Molina it is pretty bad.

People were saying, in all seriousness, that Joshua is champion of the world cos Mayweather has retired - as if being champion of the world means exactly that - there is one world champion in the whole of boxing. When Ryan Burnett fought they thought it was a typo in the programme and that it must be an eliminator for Joshua.

Yeah the card wasn't exciting, but the amount of - Oh this is poo lets get a pint, lets go for a fag, I was hearing, even for Price vs Povetkin. Loads thought Bruno was Dillan White also.

I'll certainly never get the cheap seats again, not because of the view but because of the casuals - and quite possibly more than any sport, the casuals like to think they know everything about boxing.
:bow: :o

Sometimes I dream I have a stamp
with “YDKSAB” (you don’t know sh*t about boxing) and permanently stamp it on the foreheads of such people who claim to be experts in the sport.

There’s nothing wrong with being a casual. But there’s definitely something wrong with being a casual and thinking you are an expert/ have expert opinion on boxing.
I sometimes dream that to get a ticket for a sporting event you must pass some kind of test - again not being arrogant and suggesting people have an encylopedic knowledge - but at least the rules of the sport. Boxing doesn't have many rules, but knowledge of weights (at least the fact there is more than one weight division) should be compulsary. Just the sheer lack of respect for the boxers last night was terrible.... yes - the fights did not get going.... it was a hugely dissapointing bill for excitement, but just the sheer lack of respect..... "oh these are just shit" - the followed by the "oh Joshua will smash both of these - they are both shit" (am I am talking about former and current world champions who are stones lighter than Joshua)..... arrrgghh.....

And boxing seems to be worse than any sport for this.... been to footie and rugby with people who do not know the rules and usually they just admit it and shut up. But boxing always brings out the expert.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 17:57
by mfc_se15
Do you think there is another sport where the "non-casual" fan base (presumably the hardcore) feel so superior over the casuals, and spend so much time moaning about them, than in Boxing? It happens in football where people look down on the plastics and get the hump with gloryhunters etc so they could give some competition. Not noticed it in cricket to be honest. I don't follow rugby, (I'm not even close to being a casual there), maybe tennis, bet those who follow that week in week out choke on their strawberries and cream when someone genuinely hasn't realised Tim Henman has retired.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 19:40
by tobyh5
Lot of snowflakes here. Calling someone a casual is a simple and quick way to describe someone who is exactly as it suggests, a casual fan - meaning someone who can enjoy the odd fight and watches the occasional show and would say they like boxing but only watches the big fights in reality. But they then talk utter crap like asking how Joshua would do against Mayweather.

What is the big deal with using a word to describe someone who watches a very small amount of the sport and so has little knowledge but then talks crap through their casualness. In the modern world, people think if they know a little about something, it is enough to talk as if they know a lot rather than just recognising their knowledge well is small. Nothing wrong with not knowing a subject in depth

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 19:49
by HomicideHenry
Running the ATGRADIO Twitter page, from time to time I will get into heated arguments with people I call casuals. The kind of guys who, no bullshit, say that Anthony Joshua could have annihilated Earnie Shavers on the basis that Holmes struggled with him and that guys today are so much bigger. I can't stand people who are completely dismissive of the past and only focus on today.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 01 Apr 2018, 20:10
by jamamb
tobyh5 wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 19:40 Lot of snowflakes here. Calling someone a casual is a simple and quick way to describe someone who is exactly as it suggests, a casual fan - meaning someone who can enjoy the odd fight and watches the occasional show and would say they like boxing but only watches the big fights in reality. But they then talk utter crap like asking how Joshua would do against Mayweather.

What is the big deal with using a word to describe someone who watches a very small amount of the sport and so has little knowledge but then talks crap through their casualness. In the modern world, people think if they know a little about something, it is enough to talk as if they know a lot rather than just recognising their knowledge well is small. Nothing wrong with not knowing a subject in depth
ya i agree, i dont see the problem at all using the term.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 02:20
by banjo
tobyh5 wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 19:40 Lot of snowflakes here. Calling someone a casual is a simple and quick way to describe someone who is exactly as it suggests, a casual fan - meaning someone who can enjoy the odd fight and watches the occasional show and would say they like boxing but only watches the big fights in reality. But they then talk utter crap like asking how Joshua would do against Mayweather.

What is the big deal with using a word to describe someone who watches a very small amount of the sport and so has little knowledge but then talks crap through their casualness. In the modern world, people think if they know a little about something, it is enough to talk as if they know a lot rather than just recognising their knowledge well is small. Nothing wrong with not knowing a subject in depth
Because it's used in a derogatory way by the so called "hardcore" fans to deride anybody who attempts to show a bit of interest in boxing but lacks the knowledge and might come out with some silly comments from time to time. Even the most knowledgeable of boxing fans/experts started out as a casual fan.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 03:15
by tobyh5
banjo wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 02:20
tobyh5 wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 19:40 Lot of snowflakes here. Calling someone a casual is a simple and quick way to describe someone who is exactly as it suggests, a casual fan - meaning someone who can enjoy the odd fight and watches the occasional show and would say they like boxing but only watches the big fights in reality. But they then talk utter crap like asking how Joshua would do against Mayweather.

What is the big deal with using a word to describe someone who watches a very small amount of the sport and so has little knowledge but then talks crap through their casualness. In the modern world, people think if they know a little about something, it is enough to talk as if they know a lot rather than just recognising their knowledge well is small. Nothing wrong with not knowing a subject in depth
Because it's used in a derogatory way by the so called "hardcore" fans to deride anybody who attempts to show a bit of interest in boxing but lacks the knowledge and might come out with some silly comments from time to time. Even the most knowledgeable of boxing fans/experts started out as a casual fan.
Big deal. If I spouted some shite about football having watched about three games in five years, they may call me a casual but I am not sitting here waiting to be offended and going to go running off crying. Sorry mate, although I get the point, its a bit of a "so what?"

Its a one word, quick and easy (and accurate) way to describe the group of people it is intended to.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 05:42
by maverick23
The friends I go to the boxing with (the last 3 AJ fights, his fight against Martin and loads of others over the last few years) only have a passing interest in boxing.

It’s a bit annoying having some of their questions but ultimately it’s these kind of fans that allow the big fights to happen.

If AJ could only sell a few thousand tickets and wouldn’t do many PPV buys then his fights with Martin, Klitschko, Parker wouldn’t have happened.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 09:24
by oogiebe
black panther wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 15:45
stujones wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 07:21 Having experienced a Joshua card live for the first (and probably only) time and up with the "casuals" - I can say they were as annoying as feck. Okay, I'm not expecting everyone to have encyclopedia knowledge of boxing - but when people were saying that Carlos Molina fought Anthony Joshua and this Kelly fella cannot be that good because Joshua stopped Molina it is pretty bad.

People were saying, in all seriousness, that Joshua is champion of the world cos Mayweather has retired - as if being champion of the world means exactly that - there is one world champion in the whole of boxing. When Ryan Burnett fought they thought it was a typo in the programme and that it must be an eliminator for Joshua.

Yeah the card wasn't exciting, but the amount of - Oh this is poo lets get a pint, lets go for a fag, I was hearing, even for Price vs Povetkin. Loads thought Bruno was Dillan White also.

I'll certainly never get the cheap seats again, not because of the view but because of the casuals - and quite possibly more than any sport, the casuals like to think they know everything about boxing.
:bow: :o

Sometimes I dream I have a stamp
with “YDKSAB” (you don’t know sh*t about boxing) and permanently stamp it on the foreheads of such people who claim to be experts in the sport.

There’s nothing wrong with being a casual. But there’s definitely something wrong with being a casual and thinking you are an expert/ have expert opinion on boxing.
LMAO!!! I want that stamp!

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 09:43
by Stuarty
Most of my mates are casuals. I enjoy sitting watching fights with them and I've been to a few shows with them as well etc... They're not the type to ask daft questions and come away with outlandish statements. The sport needs casual fans.

Some of them can be torture to listen to right enough. There's nothing worse than listening to a causal who thinks they know it all because they've seen more than three fights in their life. Gets on my nipple ends.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 10:26
by Tommyscc
My casual mate who’s a “big Joshua Fan”
Keeps telling me Joshua’s cannabis misdemeanour was during the Olympics itself

“How many minutes In a round” he asked Saturday while singing sweet Caroline

Honestly

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 10:27
by oogiebe
Tommyscc wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:26 My casual mate who’s a “big Joshua Fan”
Keeps telling me Joshua’s cannabis misdemeanour was during the Olympics itself

“How many minutes In a round” he asked Saturday while singing sweet Caroline

Honestly
LMAO!! Sometimes friends can by somewhat "trying"...

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 10:49
by Jackson328
maverick23 wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 05:42 The friends I go to the boxing with (the last 3 AJ fights, his fight against Martin and loads of others over the last few years) only have a passing interest in boxing.

It’s a bit annoying having some of their questions but ultimately it’s these kind of fans that allow the big fights to happen.

If AJ could only sell a few thousand tickets and wouldn’t do many PPV buys then his fights with Martin, Klitschko, Parker wouldn’t have happened.
Stuarty wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 09:43 Most of my mates are casuals. I enjoy sitting watching fights with them and I've been to a few shows with them as well etc... They're not the type to ask daft questions and come away with outlandish statements. The sport needs casual fans.

Some of them can be torture to listen to right enough. There's nothing worse than listening to a causal who thinks they know it all because they've seen more than three fights in their life. Gets on my nipple ends.
Two good posts to sum it up really. I used to watch a lot of rugby league and the average attendance for my team was usually around the 10k mark but if they ever got to a big final at Old Trafford or Wembley there would be 40k plus clamouring for tickets and half of them would have no clue about the basic laws of the game. It helps create the atmosphere and fill the bigger venue though so its a necessary evil, if only the regular hard core fans could go the occasion would sink like a stone. My missus shows an occasional interest in some sports, she used to come to the pub with me and watch Eubank back in the day, she was the ultimate casual but it was great to me that she showed any interest at all. I've taken her to some live sporting occasions over the years and she usually enjoys the day out without committing to being a lifelong fan, just the way it is I suppose.

As people are saying in here, its when you get an obvious casual fan acting like an expert that it starts to grate but its often quite funny too. Some right clowns by us in the stadium last Saturday, proper AJ fan boys and screaming girls who up until the Price fight spent the whole card on the concourse getting bladdered. Some of these casual fans will eventually become more serious boxing fans however so for every event like this the sport will pick up a few more followers which is a good thing in the long run. I do find it hilarious when people have no idea about the weight divisions etc, one girl by us on Saturday stated that "Crolla would get battered by AJ"
:lol:

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 10:59
by Stuarty
Jackson328 wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:49
maverick23 wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 05:42 The friends I go to the boxing with (the last 3 AJ fights, his fight against Martin and loads of others over the last few years) only have a passing interest in boxing.

It’s a bit annoying having some of their questions but ultimately it’s these kind of fans that allow the big fights to happen.

If AJ could only sell a few thousand tickets and wouldn’t do many PPV buys then his fights with Martin, Klitschko, Parker wouldn’t have happened.
Stuarty wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 09:43 Most of my mates are casuals. I enjoy sitting watching fights with them and I've been to a few shows with them as well etc... They're not the type to ask daft questions and come away with outlandish statements. The sport needs casual fans.

Some of them can be torture to listen to right enough. There's nothing worse than listening to a causal who thinks they know it all because they've seen more than three fights in their life. Gets on my nipple ends.
Two good posts to sum it up really. I used to watch a lot of rugby league and the average attendance for my team was usually around the 10k mark but if they ever got to a big final at Old Trafford or Wembley there would be 40k plus clamouring for tickets and half of them would have no clue about the basic laws of the game. It helps create the atmosphere and fill the bigger venue though so its a necessary evil, if only the regular hard core fans could go the occasion would sink like a stone. My missus shows an occasional interest in some sports, she used to come to the pub with me and watch Eubank back in the day, she was the ultimate casual but it was great to me that she showed any interest at all. I've taken her to some live sporting occasions over the years and she usually enjoys the day out without committing to being a lifelong fan, just the way it is I suppose.

As people are saying in here, its when you get an obvious casual fan acting like an expert that it starts to grate but its often quite funny too. Some right clowns by us in the stadium last Saturday, proper AJ fan boys and screaming girls who up until the Price fight spent the whole card on the concourse getting bladdered. Some of these casual fans will eventually become more serious boxing fans however so for every event like this the sport will pick up a few more followers which is a good thing in the long run. I do find it hilarious when people have no idea about the weight divisions etc, one girl by us on Saturday stated that "Crolla would get battered by AJ"
:lol:
I was working along with this rocket a few months back who was trying to get all technical on why AJ would KO Fury. Seemed to all centre around how Fury beating Wlad was boring but AJ was exciting. He then said he's always been a fan. He loved Naz and Calzaghe and it was a shame they never fought :brick: His dad should've blown off in his mums hair the night he was conceived!

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 11:03
by Nightmare Roy
You can tell if someone is a casual if they know the words to

"Ohhh Anthonyyyy Joushuaaaa"

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 11:55
by SticknMove
I thought a casual was someone that wore pair a of farahs or wexmans with a nice colour co-ordinated gabicci.

Damn I getting old. :doh:

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 12:02
by oogiebe
SticknMove wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 11:55 I thought a casual was someone that wore pair a of farahs or wexmans with a nice colour co-ordinated gabicci.

Damn I getting old. :doh:
LOL!!! Khaki's and a golf shirt.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 12:32
by Tommyscc
oogiebe wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:27
Tommyscc wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:26 My casual mate who’s a “big Joshua Fan”
Keeps telling me Joshua’s cannabis misdemeanour was during the Olympics itself

“How many minutes In a round” he asked Saturday while singing sweet Caroline

Honestly
LMAO!! Sometimes friends can by somewhat "trying"...
I just let them enjoy it , it reminds me of
How prem football has gone tbf. Everyone wants a slice of it .

I am a Stoke Fan in a short space of time we went from 14,000 to 28,000 fans and soon to be 14,000 again

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 12:34
by oogiebe
Tommyscc wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 12:32
oogiebe wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:27
Tommyscc wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:26 My casual mate who’s a “big Joshua Fan”
Keeps telling me Joshua’s cannabis misdemeanour was during the Olympics itself

“How many minutes In a round” he asked Saturday while singing sweet Caroline

Honestly
LMAO!! Sometimes friends can by somewhat "trying"...
I just let them enjoy it , it reminds me of
How prem football has gone tbf. Everyone wants a slice of it .

I am a Stoke Fan in a short space of time we went from 14,000 to 28,000 fans and soon to be 14,000 again
Yes, in the U.S. we have our "fair weather fans" who come out of the wood work to support a team that is great. When they suck, they leave again! Drives me nuts as I suffer through the good and bad with my teams.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 13:09
by Jackson328
Stuarty wrote: 02 Apr 2018, 10:59
I was working along with this rocket a few months back who was trying to get all technical on why AJ would KO Fury. Seemed to all centre around how Fury beating Wlad was boring but AJ was exciting. He then said he's always been a fan. He loved Naz and Calzaghe and it was a shame they never fought :brick: His dad should've blown off in his mums hair the night he was conceived!
:lol:

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 13:11
by Boxerbeetle
Covfefe wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 09:13
Boxerbeetle wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 09:10
Covfefe wrote: 01 Apr 2018, 09:07

Who follows more than their own team properly though really?

I so rarely engage with premier league football these days since we were relegated. I might watch w big European game if it’s on, follow the FA Cup and still listen to the world football phone in. That’s the extent of my football these days.
Not me, I’m including myself in the ‘casual’ bracket here as well. But my dad & brother are examples of proper hardcore football fans, they can pretty much name every single player in the 92 club squads every year, and usually tell you quite a bit about each player. They can do the same for quite a few non-League teams too. They’re basically football anoraks, but I suppose that’s how casual boxing fans would think of us on here when we talk about Thai flyweights etc.
That really is in depth knowledge. I don’t think I could name every premier league manager these days. But I don’t even watch MOTD as the league doesn’t hold my interest without us in it.
Thinking more about this - I wonder what the percentage of hardcore to casual is amongst boxing fans, and how that ratio compares to football fans.

I reckon casuals make up about for 95% boxing, whereas for football it’s probably 99.9% - the collective pool of football knowledge is incredibly shallow. The real difference is that football is so much more popular and talked about so much more frequently, so most football fans don’t ever even realise they are casuals. To meet a proper hardcore football fan is extremely rare.

Re: Casuals

Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 13:26
by Jackson328
I liken it more to showpiece games and cup finals tbh, an AJ fight is currently boxings equivalent to a cup final so it attracts more casual observers. A show at the Copperbox, York Hall, Echo Arena etc isn't going to attract the same amount of casuals. I used to love playing cricket as a schoolboy but never watch county cricket at all yet I follow an Ashes series and watch the catch-up shows. I don't watch hardly any club rugby union but never miss a 6-Nations game if I can help it. I don't spout about RU or cricket as if I'm an expert though because I am a casual follower, for some strange reason lots of boxing casuals seem to think they're experts after a couple of shows. I suppose most people have had a fight at some time so they think they're talking from experience!

Re: Casuals

Posted: 03 Apr 2018, 00:02
by Cyclops
A 'casual' friend of mine said "Anthony Joshua has changed the face of boxing. Now it's bodybuilders who can't fight and look good on instagram being labelled as great boxers and that's exactly what Eubank is. George Groves is going to beat the shit out of him."

He was spot on.