Page 3 of 3

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 10 Jun 2018, 17:00
by jamesmcdonnell
ShadrachSimmo wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 15:00
martinmrts wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
I know, what the fck is that about?
Well he weighs as much as a truck.

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 10 Jun 2018, 18:08
by Grilling Machine
clopixolacuphase wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 14:16Eagle eyed boxrecers may have noticed that Tyson was billed as 6'8.5" last night. He must have shrunk.
6'8¾" :wave:

Guys that size tend to lose an inch every day, and if you want my reckon (and who doesn't), I'd say that Fury's 6'7" at his lowest. Also, as said, them massive shoes have matching heels, and Ron was closer to the camera. It's also possible that Ron's 6'10" on a good day without realising it.

But even accounting for the heels and angle, there's no doubt that Ron's at least a couple of inches taller. Ditto that one security bloke who looks like a huge Mark Williams from The Fast Show. He must be in the 6'9"-6'10" range. Valuev was really 6'10", right? Certainly not 7'.

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 10 Jun 2018, 18:10
by ShadrachSimmo
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 17:00
ShadrachSimmo wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 15:00
martinmrts wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?
I know, what the fck is that about?
Well he weighs as much as a truck.
:lol: I thought Macklin was making a comeback when I saw the title. It's all rather silly.

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 10 Jun 2018, 18:12
by MTroo
martinmrts wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 11:44 in what way is Tyson Fury a Mack, exactly ?

Image

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 11 Jun 2018, 04:47
by Stuarty
dirk2686 wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 12:44
mickey1975 wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 12:41 Dirk, did you not say he’d never box again?
You're in your forties for crying out loud. Get a life. :lol:
You two are like an old married couple man :lol:

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 11 Jun 2018, 05:16
by Syntax Error
mickey1975 wrote: 09 Jun 2018, 12:41 Dirk, did you not say he’d never box again?
To be fair, what he did on Saturday night wasn't really boxing; it as more akin to Saturday afternoon wrestling on World of Sport in the 1970s, featuring Big Daddy & Mick McManus.


When he actually engages in a proper boxing contest against a live HW, then you can say he's boxed again.

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 11 Jun 2018, 05:18
by jamamb
it was a boxing match, just a weak one, but really theres a lot of crap on most cards, fights vs career losers who are paid to get a prospect a win etc

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 11 Jun 2018, 05:20
by ILikeBeer
Enzo Mac?

Re: The Mack is Back

Posted: 11 Jun 2018, 05:27
by Stuarty
Grilling Machine wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 18:08
clopixolacuphase wrote: 10 Jun 2018, 14:16Eagle eyed boxrecers may have noticed that Tyson was billed as 6'8.5" last night. He must have shrunk.
6'8¾" :wave:

Guys that size tend to lose an inch every day, and if you want my reckon (and who doesn't), I'd say that Fury's 6'7" at his lowest. Also, as said, them massive shoes have matching heels, and Ron was closer to the camera. It's also possible that Ron's 6'10" on a good day without realising it.

But even accounting for the heels and angle, there's no doubt that Ron's at least a couple of inches taller. Ditto that one security bloke who looks like a huge Mark Williams from The Fast Show. He must be in the 6'9"-6'10" range. Valuev was really 6'10", right? Certainly not 7'.
That's why I'm divorced :confused: