Page 3 of 3

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained

Posted: 20 Aug 2018, 02:45
by TooMuch
bigjack wrote: 20 Aug 2018, 02:33
jamamb wrote: 19 Aug 2018, 23:15 tbf, it seems this thread is being kept alive by ppl saying vitali lost :lol:
He lost,but he didn't lose,Lennox won,but he didn't beat him.......is that clear enough :lol:
Yeah, but he was leading on the scorecards! :lol:

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained

Posted: 20 Aug 2018, 08:03
by Terry Dooley
Syntax Error wrote: 19 Aug 2018, 03:16
HomicideHenry wrote: 17 Aug 2018, 18:01 Win? He was behind on all scorecards. He may have "won" but he didn't beat him. His refusal of a rematch when he said he would, was evidence enough.
Have the Queensbury Rules been updated, whereby a fighter has to he ahead on the scorecards at the time he forces a stoppage too?

The refusal of a mythical rematch is a red herring & has nothing to do with the result of their actual fight.
Lewis was shot to bits and still ripped Vitali's face apart. HBO tried to convince the viewing public that it wasn't a legitimate win only to be foiled by one small but crucial detail: some of us actually understand the rules of boxing.

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained

Posted: 02 Oct 2018, 02:03
by stellar
:TU: :TU: :clap:

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained

Posted: 02 Oct 2018, 02:04
by stellar
:bow:

Re: Lewis v Klitschko II: Kiev exhibition rematch finally explained

Posted: 02 Oct 2018, 13:46
by Loki
stellar wrote: 02 Oct 2018, 02:03 :TU: :TU: :clap:
Looked like fun. Vitali’s English has deteriorated considerably.