Page 3 of 3

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 28 Sep 2018, 14:48
by SAPFO
Where in the world is showing this? My IPTV aint got ITV PPV

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 28 Sep 2018, 14:50
by jtourettes
SAPFO wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 14:48 Where in the world is showing this? My IPTV aint got ITV PPV
I ordered it on my ps4

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 28 Sep 2018, 14:54
by CaptainSpacerod
Stuarty wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 02:35 I'm taking a Glasgow bint out this evening so unless I find a boozer its unlikely that I'll see it. First date as well so as soon as it hits 9 she won't be very impressed if I drag her about the town trying to find a boxing match!
Poor girl doesn't know what she's letting herself in for

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 28 Sep 2018, 15:24
by surfthehurf
SAPFO wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 14:48 Where in the world is showing this? My IPTV aint got ITV PPV
should be in the Events/PPV section or wherever you find the 3pm kickoffs

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 28 Sep 2018, 19:06
by PredatorHayds
Forget the fight I want to know if Stuarty is playing thumb wars with a female Glaswegian anus.

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 05:03
by Stuarty
dr_devious wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 10:27
Stuarty wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 02:56 Hopefully I'll be thumb deep in her bullet hole come midnight but nothing's set in stone :maybe:
You old romantic you
I fucked that bird last night but it was drunk sex. Good drunk sex but not my best work :lol:

I've pegged a few horrors in my time but this bird last night was a top class bird. Really nice looking. Getting kids soon so back down to earth with a bang today :doh:

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 05:21
by Oiky
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:03
dr_devious wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 10:27
Stuarty wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 02:56 Hopefully I'll be thumb deep in her bullet hole come midnight but nothing's set in stone :maybe:
You old romantic you
I fucked that bird last night but it was drunk sex. Good drunk sex but not my best work :lol:

I've pegged a few horrors in my time but this bird last night was a top class bird. Really nice looking. Getting kids soon so back down to earth with a bang today :doh:
Good do :TU:

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:05
by Stuarty
Oiky wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:21
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:03
dr_devious wrote: 28 Sep 2018, 10:27

You old romantic you
I fucked that bird last night but it was drunk sex. Good drunk sex but not my best work :lol:

I've pegged a few horrors in my time but this bird last night was a top class bird. Really nice looking. Getting kids soon so back down to earth with a bang today :doh:
Good do :TU:
Was giving me a blow job and talking dirty in between :clap: :lol: Fuckin top class :lol:

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:20
by smiling assassin
Must of had a bit of powder on the firm otherwise you would of done your beans in seconds with that carry on :lol:

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:25
by tobyh5
I hate to break up the party Stu and return to the thread but I was just on insta looking at pics of Smith with the Ring belt and I just had this feeling that it was a bloody cheap way to get a Ring belt. I do not consider him quite there yet and dont think the belt should have been on the line.

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:34
by Ruthless-RKO
tobyh5 wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:25 I hate to break up the party Stu and return to the thread but I was just on insta looking at pics of Smith with the Ring belt and I just had this feeling that it was a bloody cheap way to get a Ring belt. I do not consider him quite there yet and dont think the belt should have been on the line.
This tournament was an open tournament. All the best super middleweights got an invite. The better the fighters, the better the tournament. Some decided not to enter. Zurdo in particular, if he thinks he’s the best 168’er out there, he should be entering the tournament and winning.

Why punish Smith, Groves and the rest of them if the likes of Zurdo, DeGale and the other world champion(s) don’t want to enter.

It’s just a shame that Smith didn’t get a chance to beat Bræhmer.

I agree he might not be there yet, but then again, he now has it, so it’s time for him to now prove why he is The Ring Mag champion.

Had the remaining top SMW’s entered, there’s question that Smith had no chance of winning.

This is why we need the best of the best in these tournaments. The CW was big success. Great fights.

The Bantamweights have got Tete, Burnett and Inoue. One should definately meet another in the semi final. The winner of this tournament will definately be THE CHAMPION AT BANTAMWEIGHT.

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:37
by Noxy
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:05
Oiky wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:21
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:03

I fucked that bird last night but it was drunk sex. Good drunk sex but not my best work :lol:

I've pegged a few horrors in my time but this bird last night was a top class bird. Really nice looking. Getting kids soon so back down to earth with a bang today :doh:
Good do :TU:
Was giving me a blow job and talking dirty in between :clap: :lol: Fuckin top class :lol:
Good on ya!

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:43
by tobyh5
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:34
Why punish Smith, Groves and the rest of them if the likes of Zurdo, DeGale and the other world champion(s) don’t want
Why punish the "rest of them" because they decided to not enter a tournament run by a commercial company who just because they call it "world series" does not actually make it that. It is not like an amateur world championship or olympic games. and part of the system and structure. it is a made up name by a bunch of guys trying to make themselves a few million quid.

If they made it at Heavyweight and AJ and Wilder told them to fck off, do you think the winner should leapfrog them to claim the Ring belt?

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 14:55
by Ruthless-RKO
tobyh5 wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:43
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:34
Why punish Smith, Groves and the rest of them if the likes of Zurdo, DeGale and the other world champion(s) don’t want
Why punish the "rest of them" because they decided to not enter a tournament run by a commercial company who just because they call it "world series" does not actually make it that. It is not like an amateur world championship or olympic games. and part of the system and structure. it is a made up name by a bunch of guys trying to make themselves a few million quid.

If they made it at Heavyweight and AJ and Wilder told them to fck off, do you think the winner should leapfrog them to claim the Ring belt?
It depends who is in the tournament. The Ring for example have gone more strict with their vacant belts. Before it was if anyone of the 2 top 5 ranked fought each other, the belt could be at stake. They made an exception here. I think Smith was #4 and Groves was #1.. i don’t see an issue with that.

Has Zurdo fought, never mind beat a top 5 ranked SMW apart from Abraham.

I have nothing against Zurdo. He’s a top boxer.

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 15:10
by tobyh5
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:55
tobyh5 wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:43
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:34
Why punish Smith, Groves and the rest of them if the likes of Zurdo, DeGale and the other world champion(s) don’t want
Why punish the "rest of them" because they decided to not enter a tournament run by a commercial company who just because they call it "world series" does not actually make it that. It is not like an amateur world championship or olympic games. and part of the system and structure. it is a made up name by a bunch of guys trying to make themselves a few million quid.

If they made it at Heavyweight and AJ and Wilder told them to fck off, do you think the winner should leapfrog them to claim the Ring belt?
It depends who is in the tournament. The Ring for example have gone more strict with their vacant belts. Before it was if anyone of the 2 top 5 ranked fought each other, the belt could be at stake. They made an exception here. I think Smith was #4 and Groves was #1.. i don’t see an issue with that.

Has Zurdo fought, never mind beat a top 5 ranked SMW apart from Abraham.

I have nothing against Zurdo. He’s a top boxer.
Be nice if you actually replied to the point I was making, which was a reply to your logic that Smith should not be punished because others did not enter a made up, not official, commercial tournament

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 15:11
by jamamb
zurdo didnt enter because top rank doesnt let there guys into the wbss because top rank wants full control and in house fights. same reason saucedo and ramirez arnt in at 140

now that uzcategui seems top rank affiliated i dont have my hopes up for callum vs zurdo or uzcategui. the other belt holder is david benavidez, but as a 21 year old i feel like he may be taken more slowly

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 15:22
by Oiky
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:05
Oiky wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:21
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:03

I fucked that bird last night but it was drunk sex. Good drunk sex but not my best work :lol:

I've pegged a few horrors in my time but this bird last night was a top class bird. Really nice looking. Getting kids soon so back down to earth with a bang today :doh:
Good do :TU:
Was giving me a blow job and talking dirty in between :clap: :lol: Fuckin top class :lol:
Get up there girl, fair play to her :lol: you had a better night than me :lol:

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 17:11
by Ruthless-RKO
tobyh5 wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 15:10
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:55
tobyh5 wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:43

Why punish the "rest of them" because they decided to not enter a tournament run by a commercial company who just because they call it "world series" does not actually make it that. It is not like an amateur world championship or olympic games. and part of the system and structure. it is a made up name by a bunch of guys trying to make themselves a few million quid.

If they made it at Heavyweight and AJ and Wilder told them to fck off, do you think the winner should leapfrog them to claim the Ring belt?
It depends who is in the tournament. The Ring for example have gone more strict with their vacant belts. Before it was if anyone of the 2 top 5 ranked fought each other, the belt could be at stake. They made an exception here. I think Smith was #4 and Groves was #1.. i don’t see an issue with that.

Has Zurdo fought, never mind beat a top 5 ranked SMW apart from Abraham.

I have nothing against Zurdo. He’s a top boxer.
Be nice if you actually replied to the point I was making, which was a reply to your logic that Smith should not be punished because others did not enter a made up, not official, commercial tournament
A tournament where other top fighters will enter and you can prove yourself. I guess it worked better for Usyk because the best CW’s entered.

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 17:13
by Ruthless-RKO
jamamb wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 15:11 zurdo didnt enter because top rank doesnt let there guys into the wbss because top rank wants full control and in house fights. same reason saucedo and ramirez arnt in at 140

now that uzcategui seems top rank affiliated i dont have my hopes up for callum vs zurdo or uzcategui. the other belt holder is david benavidez, but as a 21 year old i feel like he may be taken more slowly
Yeh, I’m aware of Arum’s tactics..

Re: Groves v Smith PPV

Posted: 29 Sep 2018, 17:14
by Stuarty
Oiky wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 15:22
Stuarty wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 14:05
Oiky wrote: 29 Sep 2018, 05:21
Good do :TU:
Was giving me a blow job and talking dirty in between :clap: :lol: Fuckin top class :lol:
Get up there girl, fair play to her :lol: you had a better night than me :lol:
Not tonight mate! I've got my two oldest kids who are wide awake and I'm waiting on match of the day coming on :lol: