BoxRec

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 09:29**

lillywhite14 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:27
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dillian Whyte is a very dangerous fight for anyone not called Anthony Joshua or Tyson Fury.
He would have a decent chance of beating Wilder.

I think Wilder would take him out early to mid rounds. Too easy to hit.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 09:32**

oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:29
lillywhite14 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:27
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dillian Whyte is a very dangerous fight for anyone not called Anthony Joshua or Tyson Fury.
He would have a decent chance of beating Wilder.
I think Wilder would take him out early to mid rounds. Too easy to hit.

Oh yeah, I’d have money on Wilder winning but Whyte can stop him, I have no doubt. I think Wilder is a highlight reel KO waiting to happen.
Wilder would more than likely get to Whyte first though.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 10:35**

I like breazeale,a tough chap. But I got whyte stopping him in the late rounds

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 11:03**

Having the interim belt on the line is a bit mad but I don't mind that the WBC are pushing for this fight to happen. Breazeale shouldn't be allowed to just sit on his #1 spot forever. He's only had 3 fights in nearly 3 years since challenging Joshua.

2017 was good for him with wins over the undefeated Ugonoh and former title challenger Eric Molina, but he didn't do enough in 2018.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 11:16**

ElJefe wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 11:03 Having the interim belt on the line is a bit mad but I don't mind that the WBC are pushing for this fight to happen. Breazeale shouldn't be allowed to just sit on his #1 spot forever. He's only had 3 fights in nearly 3 years since challenging Joshua.

2017 was good for him with wins over the undefeated Ugonoh and former title challenger Eric Molina, but he didn't do enough in 2018.

Good points!

Remember that Ugonoh almost had Breazeale out.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 11:37**

lefthook82 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 07:11 I wonder what the purse split will be.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 11:39**

lefthook82 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 07:11 I wonder what the purse split will be.

Whyte 40%...Breazeale 40%...AJ 20%

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 18:11**

lillywhite14 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:27
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dillian Whyte is a very dangerous fight for anyone not called Anthony Joshua or Tyson Fury.
He would have a decent chance of beating Wilder.

I agree with you about him being a dangerous fight for the rest of the division outside of the big 3, although with a little more seasoning I expect some of the rising stars to beat him. I respectfully disagree with you on Wilder. Wilder is not a good boxer, and every live body he fights gives him issues, but he'd still knock Whyte out.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 20:59**

Whyte will destroy Breazeale.

Posted: **13 Feb 2019, 21:02**

Yeah this wouldn't go well for Breazeale. He's talking like he really thinks he's hot sh*t on one of those recent Inside PBC shows he was saying about Kownacki "he's a heavybag with legs" I was thinking...sh*t he'd kick your ass

Whyte would too. Probably worse than Kownacki.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 12:02**

clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.

Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 12:04**

lillywhite14 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:27
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dillian Whyte is a very dangerous fight for anyone not called Anthony Joshua or Tyson Fury.
He would have a decent chance of beating Wilder.

I'd also back Whyte to take a win against Wilder. Wilder has his usual punchers chance (which he generally takes), but Whyte has made such an improvement in the last 24 months I think his skill and fitness takes him beyond Wilder now, and his one punch knockout power is massively improved too.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 12:08**

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:02
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.

It’s an analogy evocative of their combined gargantuan mass, not of their age. Get some imagination, mate.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 13:14**

"[Deontay Wilder] continues to run, I'll continue to keep fighting the fights he doesn't want. Be ready Dillian Whyte because trouble is coming," Breazeale stated on social media.

Wilder is running away from fighting him, instead fighting Tyson Fury? Running away to fight a better fighter? Ugh! Breazeale is another big mouth with a resume that boasts nothing. I hope Whyte slaughters him.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 14:42**

Whyte by tko in late rounds when it’s clear Breazeale can’t win and is only taking one to many.
I’ll go for for rd 11 when the ref or his corner stop it.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 15:38**

clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:08
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:02
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.
It’s an analogy evocative of their combined gargantuan mass, not of their age. Get some imagination, mate.

What an odd use of the analogy. Using 'dinosaur' as an analogy generally refers to a person's age, not their weight (also you did actually say in your previous post 'old dinosaurs') so forgive me for thinking that what you said was what you actually meant.

You know language is an effective communication tool if you use it properly, rather than me having to use my imagination to understand what you're talking about.

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 17:54**

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 15:38
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:08
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:02
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.
It’s an analogy evocative of their combined gargantuan mass, not of their age. Get some imagination, mate.
What an odd use of the analogy. Using 'dinosaur' as an analogy generally refers to a person's age, not their weight (also you did actually say in your previous post 'old dinosaurs') so forgive me for thinking that what you said was what you actually meant.

You know language is an effective communication tool if you use it properly, rather than me having to use my imagination to understand what you're talking about.

In the South East of England we say "big old" to just describe something that's big. like "she's a big old girl" for a larger lady or "Rob3_142 is a proper big old ugly smartarse patronising pudendum isn't he?"

It's probably a colloquialism that you're not used to: I'm sorry it got you so confused.

You didn't get a Valentine's card today, eh?

Posted: **14 Feb 2019, 17:55**

clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 17:54
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 15:38
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:08
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:02
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.
It’s an analogy evocative of their combined gargantuan mass, not of their age. Get some imagination, mate.
What an odd use of the analogy. Using 'dinosaur' as an analogy generally refers to a person's age, not their weight (also you did actually say in your previous post 'old dinosaurs') so forgive me for thinking that what you said was what you actually meant.

You know language is an effective communication tool if you use it properly, rather than me having to use my imagination to understand what you're talking about.
In the South East of England we say "big old" to just describe something that's big. like "she's a big old girl" for a larger lady or "Rob3_142 is a proper big old ugly smartarse patronising pudendum isn't he?"

It's probably a colloquialism that you're not used to: I'm sorry it got you so confused.

You didn't get a Valentine's card today, eh?

Posted: **15 Feb 2019, 02:28**

clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 17:54
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 15:38
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:08
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:02
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.
It’s an analogy evocative of their combined gargantuan mass, not of their age. Get some imagination, mate.
What an odd use of the analogy. Using 'dinosaur' as an analogy generally refers to a person's age, not their weight (also you did actually say in your previous post 'old dinosaurs') so forgive me for thinking that what you said was what you actually meant.

You know language is an effective communication tool if you use it properly, rather than me having to use my imagination to understand what you're talking about.
In the South East of England we say "big old" to just describe something that's big. like "she's a big old girl" for a larger lady or "Rob3_142 is a proper big old ugly smartarse patronising pudendum isn't he?"

It's probably a colloquialism that you're not used to: I'm sorry it got you so confused.

You didn't get a Valentine's card today, eh?

I've lived in the south east of England for almost 12 years, and people don't commonly use the term dinosaur to describe someone as 'big old'. So no, it's not a colloquialism that I am familiar with, nor will anyone else outside deluded perspective.

Posted: **15 Feb 2019, 03:48**

Rob3_142 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2019, 02:28
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 17:54
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 15:38
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:08
Rob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 12:02
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dinosaurs?! Whyte is younger than Wilder.
It’s an analogy evocative of their combined gargantuan mass, not of their age. Get some imagination, mate.
What an odd use of the analogy. Using 'dinosaur' as an analogy generally refers to a person's age, not their weight (also you did actually say in your previous post 'old dinosaurs') so forgive me for thinking that what you said was what you actually meant.

You know language is an effective communication tool if you use it properly, rather than me having to use my imagination to understand what you're talking about.
In the South East of England we say "big old" to just describe something that's big. like "she's a big old girl" for a larger lady or "Rob3_142 is a proper big old ugly smartarse patronising pudendum isn't he?"

It's probably a colloquialism that you're not used to: I'm sorry it got you so confused.

You didn't get a Valentine's card today, eh?
I've lived in the south east of England for almost 12 years, and people don't commonly use the term dinosaur to describe someone as 'big old'. So no, it's not a colloquialism that I am familiar with, nor will anyone else outside deluded perspective.

Well, unless you are 12 years old (which is entirely possible) you’re not FROM the South East then, are you? And from the pedantic, douchey tone of your writing i’ll assume you’ve probably hardly made any friends since your move so wouldn’t have been able to do much research on how people speak anyway, as i’m sure people generally get fed up talking to you and walk away.

Posted: **15 Feb 2019, 07:29**

lillywhite14 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:32
oogiebe wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:29
lillywhite14 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 09:27
clopixolacuphase wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 06:30 This is a decent undercard fight between two proven B level fighters. They are both cannon fodder for the titlelists and gatekeepers for the much more interesting pool of prospects.

Two big Old dinosaurs clomping around.

I’m not that interested.
Dillian Whyte is a very dangerous fight for anyone not called Anthony Joshua or Tyson Fury.
He would have a decent chance of beating Wilder.
I think Wilder would take him out early to mid rounds. Too easy to hit.
Oh yeah, I’d have money on Wilder winning but Whyte can stop him, I have no doubt. I think Wilder is a highlight reel KO waiting to happen.
Wilder would more than likely get to Whyte first though.

Problem with Whyte is that he's often a painfully slower starter. His left-hooky style could actually work vs Wilder who can be knocked out. Problem is I think whyte would be taken out before he had the chance. He'd have to put it on Wilder from round one

Posted: **15 Feb 2019, 08:14**

I too think Whyte would beat wilder though I think Fury beats wilder next time. I don’t know why Whyte didn’t finish chisora in the first round last time, he clearly had chisora stunned. As said above he would clearly need to lay it on wilder from the off. Breazdale isn’t great I’m hoping Whyte does it in good style, he can then have bragging rights for AJ or Fury

Posted: **15 Feb 2019, 08:15**

I too think Whyte would beat wilder though I think Fury beats wilder next time. I don’t know why Whyte didn’t finish chisora in the first round last time, he clearly had chisora stunned. As said above he would clearly need to lay it on wilder from the off. Breazdale isn’t great I’m hoping Whyte does it in good style, he can then have bragging rights for AJ or Fury

Posted: **15 Feb 2019, 12:50**

Mad dog (Whyte) vs Bull (Breazele) match-up, this is going to be heavy. I hope Whyte wins it, he deserves a world-title shot

BoxRec

Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte

Re: Dominic Breazeale v Dillian Whyte