BoxRec

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:09 No it's not. Did you have a big bowl of stupid this morning? with extra idiocy? Such a troll.

Answer the god damn question I posed and stop avoiding it!

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:10 Answer the god damn question I posed and stop avoiding it!

again...no, it's not what I said. Don't get emotional...LMAO!!!!

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 13:55 We have very different bodies. I want my trainer to completely understand what's happening to me in that ring. If I get hit low, I want a guy who knows what that feels like to be in my corner, not some woman who tells me to walk it off. It's more than getting direction. The trainer needs to be completely in tune with me during the rounds. Having a different sex in my corner takes away from that.

EO, here's a reminder for you to refresh your memory.

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:11 again...no, it's not what I said. Don't get emotional...LMAO!!!!

I’ll ask the same question again and see if you’ll keep ducking...

So you’re essentially saying that Ann Wolfe couldn’t possibly train a man, simply because she hasn’t got a pair of bôllôcks?

Do you know anything about Ann Wolfe and have you seen the fighters she’s trained, as well as evaluating her competence at performing such a role?

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:13 I’ll ask the same question again and see if you’ll keep ducking...

So you’re essentially saying that Ann Wolfe couldn’t possibly train a man, simply because she hasn’t got a pair of bôllôcks?

Do you know anything about Ann Wolfe and have you seen the fighters she’s trained, as well as evaluating her competence at performing such a role?

I bumped my post so you can read it again. when you come to your senses and stop twisting my post, I may or may not respond, as your entertainment value is plummeting.

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:15 I bumped my post so you can read it again. when you come to your senses and stop twisting my post, I may or may not respond, as your entertainment value is plummeting.

I read it and it didn’t answer my questions. I’ll assume the reasons for that.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:17 I read it and it didn’t answer my questions. I’ll assume the reasons for that.

If you are assuming you just can't comprehend anything outside of your own narcissistic needs, yes, that's the reason. Have you noticed that no one else on the thread has even replied to you posts? You are the gift that keeps on giving! I'd bet you've never laced on gloves in your life!

SenorPipino wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 13:55 Was Serena still a kid then?

She was winning grand slams.

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:20 If you are assuming you just can't comprehend anything outside of your own narcissistic needs, yes, that's the reason. Have you noticed that no one else on the thread has even replied to you posts? You are the gift that keeps on giving! I'd bet you've never laced on gloves in your life!

No. By your own admission, you didn’t answer the question I posed. All you did was elaborate on your thoughts and this explanation didn’t directly address the question.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:22 No. By your own admission, you didn’t answer the question I posed. All you did was elaborate on your thoughts and this explanation didn’t directly address the question.

Seriously, you've hyper-focused on one example (and an obvious one) I've given. But it goes much deeper than that. The whole point is that men and woman are different and we feel differently both emotionally and physically. It's difficult enough to "connect" with a trainer on all levels. By having one of a different sex makes that more difficult. Woman's boxing is not nearly at a level of the men, so we see a lot of men in the corners. I'm sure there will someday be a woman who can transcend that chasm and be a great trainer for a male boxer. So far there are none.

Now, if you are merely talking about gym training and not corner work, then I can see a woman being very successful there.

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:28 Seriously, you've hyper-focused on one example (and an obvious one) I've given. But it goes much deeper than that. The whole point is that men and woman are different and we feel differently both emotionally and physically. It's difficult enough to "connect" with a trainer on all levels. By having one of a different sex makes that more difficult. Woman's boxing is not nearly at a level of the men, so we see a lot of men in the corners. I'm sure there will someday be a woman who can transcend that chasm and be a great trainer for a male boxer. So far there are none.

Now, if you are merely talking about gym training and not corner work, then I can see a woman being very successful there.

You still didn’t directly address the question I posed.

And nor did you read my own thoughts on this matter, because you wouldn’t have responded that way if you had.

Why are my questions so difficult to directly answer?

RKY wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 13:28 There's just no way a women could beat a professional male. Don't underestimate what it takes to be a fully fledged professional. It's like tennis, even the lowest level pro is still better than high level amatuers and would wipe the floor with the elite women.

Charlie Zelenoff was a professional... Andrew Hartley.. all that fodder from Arkansas.

Trust me, Claressa Shields could beat some pro men her own weight.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 13:43 Serena could wipe the floor with a low ranking pro.

On the court, she's half a man.

No she wouldn't, she'd get trashed.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:32 You still didn’t directly address the question I posed.

And nor did you read my own thoughts on this matter, because you wouldn’t have responded that way if you had.

Why are my questions so difficult to directly answer?

You asked me a question about whether a woman not having testicles precludes her working a corner. You implied that it was my argument in a prior post. I then reposted that post that you deduced that from to show you that it was just an example. You are either seriously disturbed, or just plain stupid. I'm betting a bit of both. Go on your way and feed off some other poster here.

RKY wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:35 No she wouldn't, she'd get trashed.

She already did. Some noname finished a couple drinks and drubbed her and then Venus. I think he was ranked 250 or so.

JCS wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:34 Charlie Zelenoff was a professional... Andrew Hartley.. all that fodder from Arkansas.

Trust me, Claressa Shields could beat some pro men her own weight.

Shed beat Rufus.

oogiebe wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:37 You asked me a question about whether a woman not having testicles precludes her working a corner. You implied that it was my argument in a prior post. I then reposted that post that you deduced that from to show you that it was just an example. You are either seriously disturbed, or just plain stupid. I'm betting a bit of both. Go on your way and feed off some other poster here.

l’ll ask the same questions again (for the third time of asking) and see if you’ll keep ducking...

So you’re essentially saying that Ann Wolfe couldn’t possibly train a man, simply because she hasn’t got a pair of bôllôcks?

Do you know anything about Ann Wolfe and have you seen the fighters she’s trained, as well as evaluating her competence at performing such a role?

None of your responses have mentioned Ann Wolfe’s name.

Answer my questions head-on or admit to lacking knowledge about this particular individual.

All you keep doing is ducking the questions being asked.

RKY wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:35 No she wouldn't, she'd get trashed.

I don't think so. She could beat half the male pros at arm wrestling.

And plenty girl wrestlers are now on boy's teams at schools and are winning bouts with regularity.

Guys will often forfeit so they aren't embarrassed by a girl.

Men are generally always going to be stronger than females of a similar weight.

But strength isn't always a determining factor in athletic contests.

Talent takes priority.

Serena is past it. In her prime she could barely win a game against any man in the top 500.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:41 l’ll ask the same questions again (for the third time of asking) and see if you’ll keep ducking...

So you’re essentially saying that Ann Wolfe couldn’t possibly train a man, simply because she hasn’t got a pair of bôllôcks?

Do you know anything about Ann Wolfe and have you seen the fighters she’s trained, as well as evaluating her competence at performing such a role?

None of your responses have mentioned Ann Wolfe’s name.

Answer my questions head-on or admit to lacking knowledge about this particular individual.

All you keep doing is ducking the questions being asked.

First off that is NOT what I'm essentially saying for the umpteenth time, you retarded arse! How could I be even remotely say that while you also say I haven't even mentioned Ann Wolfe!

You make a delusional conclusion from my original post, which was a good faith response to your own post, and then accuse me of ducking a question from that delusional conclusion as if that was my exact post or something. What in the hell is wrong with you?

I am familiar with her work and who she is and have no desire to 'prove' any of that with you. My patience is at an end. My Lord! No wonder everyone makes fun of you!

Just read the first sentence, point out he's wrong and then let him hammer away drivel on his keyboard that you'll never read. Youre talking about a guy that defended his blanket statement that Canelo only fought once last year.

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:53 Just read the first sentence, point out he's wrong and then let him hammer away drivel on his keyboard that you'll never read. Youre talking about a guy that defended his blanket statement that Canelo only fought once last year.

True. He's my pariah. It's my own fault. I engage for fun and then I get amazed at the crazy conclusions he makes! LMAO!

Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 14:38 Shed beat Rufus.

No doubt.

Female boxing makes as much sense as making chess tournament for idiots

dagilechia wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 15:03 Female boxing makes as much sense as making chess tournament for idiots

Why?