jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 11:58
Wasnt that called rockem sockem robots?
Yeah but rockem sockem robots were faster than Joe Joyce!
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:03
by revpickles
jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 11:58
Wasnt that called rockem sockem robots?
They renamed it that in the 90's i believe , original game was Raving Bonkers , i have been told the first game was made much better but i've never played rockem sockem, it looks similar though...
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:04
by Pukka Cheese
revpickles wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 11:20
Plenty of great fights for Joe at the moment , Chisora , Martin, Kownacki , Hughie , Hammer , Whyte ...take your pick, some he wins easy, some he loses!
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:07
by oogiebe
revpickles wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 12:03
They renamed it that in the 90's i believe , original game was Raving Bonkers , i have been told the first game was made much better but i've never played rockem sockem, it looks similar though...
Here in the US it was always Rockim' Sockim' Robots. I had it in the early 70's as a kid.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:08
by Ruthless-RKO
Joyce: Ustinov Win Proves I'm A Credible Opponent For Joshua
Alexander Ustinov is 42 years old and was knocked out in his previous fight.
Joe Joyce still believes that the way he beat Ustinov on Saturday night disproved promoter Eddie Hearn’s contention that “Juggernaut” isn’t a credible opponent for Great Britain’s biggest boxing star. Hearn indicated recently that Joyce hasn’t accomplished enough during his 1½-year pro career to warrant consideration for a fight against Anthony Joshua.
“Well, there you go,” Joyce told IFL TV in a post-fight interview Saturday night. “The proof’s in the pudding. You tell Eddie, you know, winning this fight like that, before Hunter, proves to the world, and to Eddie, that I am a credible opponent [for Joshua].”
England’s Joyce, meanwhile, is scheduled to return to the ring July 13. The 6-feet-6, 261-pound contender’s opponent hasn’t been secured for his fight on the Daniel Dubois-Nathan Gorman undercard at O2 Arena in London.
“Well, I’ve got an idea and a few names in the hat,” Joyce said. “But until it’s all signed off, then, you know, I’m not gonna mention any names.”
When asked if former WBA champion Alexander Povetkin is among that group of potential opponents, Joyce replied, “Yeah, that’s an interesting fight. That’s one of the names, yeah. Possibly, yeah. I wanna be up against a really good opponent on July 13th. You know, it’s gonna be a massive heavyweight showdown that day, with, you know, three of us fighting – me, obviously, Daniel and Nathan.”
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:12
by oogiebe
If Joyce wants to be a serious contender, then he must have a couple of more step-up fights. Or else he'll be in way over his head. Beating Ustinov (as we all know) doesn't mean he's ready for Joshua. Or any other top 10 HW.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:27
by kevo
They oughta call him 'slow Joyce' aha...hahaha...haha....ehhhh
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:29
by revpickles
oogiebe wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 12:07
Here in the US it was always Rockim' Sockim' Robots. I had it in the early 70's as a kid.
They must have renamed it over here i guess ? The head on the robots used to pop up on a metal ratchet. It made one hell of a noise too.
Brilliant game, I might keep my eye out for one for my kids - it was good fun.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:30
by oogiebe
revpickles wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 12:29
They must have renamed it over here i guess ? The head on the robots used to pop up on a metal ratchet. It made one hell of a noise too.
Brilliant game, I might keep my eye out for one for my kids - it was good fun.
I loved it. I'm smiling now just remembering!
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:35
by revpickles
oogiebe wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 12:12
If Joyce wants to be a serious contender, then he must have a couple of more step-up fights. Or else he'll be in way over his head. Beating Ustinov (as we all know) doesn't mean he's ready for Joshua. Or any other top 10 HW.
Agree, Lewison was his toughest fight to press (not including Usyk) I'd like to see him get some rounds in but ultimately where is he going ? Has he ever changed his style ? Can he change his style ?
....At 33 years old the clocks ticking!
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:36
by oogiebe
revpickles wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 12:35
Agree, Lewison was his toughest fight to press (not including Usyk) I'd like to see him get some rounds in but ultimately where is he going ? Has he ever changed his style ? Can he change his style ?
....At 33 years old the clocks ticking!
points taken. He doesn't have to change styles, just adopt a simple defense like Foreman's cross arms. Anything would be an improvement.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 12:43
by overhand_right
Looking at Boxrec's top 10 heavies, Kownacki, Parker, Pulev, Ortiz and Miller occupy the bottom half. Joyce should be able to beat any of them if he's going anywhere. Miller I expect will be suspended for a while, but why not fight two of the others in quick succession and make a statement? Could be up for a title fight start of 2020.
None of the aforementioned seem to have a fight lined up.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 13:16
by Steveh583
Finkel wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 08:29
Really? That's surreal I've missed that one. Admittedly I haven't followed him closely, only through YouTube, but I watched back his wins against Stiverne, Thomas, Jozic, Kiladze and Hanks.
Capoeira skills in full. 1.34 Impressive for such a big man.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 13:34
by MasterG
Regardless what people think about Joyce he is fighting opponents way above anything that another heavyweight novices would ever fight. He deserves credit for that. 9 fights and taking on fringe world class opposition.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 13:52
by jamesmcdonnell
revpickles wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 12:03
They renamed it that in the 90's i believe , original game was Raving Bonkers , i have been told the first game was made much better but i've never played rockem sockem, it looks similar though...
Nah, it was rock em sock em in the uk as far back I recall, I'm sure they were around in the late 70s
Capoeira skills in full. 1.34 Impressive for such a big man.
That's like slow motion compared to most capoeira, it's odd, he must have great balance, but he seems really really slow.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 14:09
by Steveh583
jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 13:53
That's like slow motion compared to most capoeira, it's odd, he must have great balance, but he seems really really slow.
Most of 'em don't have to life that sort of bulk off the floor tho.
I've started doing it every Sunday as a family activity at a local boxing gym, it's quite good fun.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 14:32
by bigjack
I really like him,he is slow but he's going to be in some exciting fights in the near future and will be very difficult to beat due to his shear size and work rate alone.Of course there is the chance he will get bombed out with a single big shot but it's going to be fun watching him challenge the top guys.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 14:38
by oogiebe
I kind of would like to see Joyce take on Breazeale at this point. I think it would be a good fight. Great scalp on Joyce's ledger.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 16:08
by jamesmcdonnell
I think if Joyce turns out to be more powerful as a pro than amateur, and has a really good chin, he could go far, the trouble is, he has very little time left in his career, so very little time to waste, or time to learn.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 16:42
by JimStone
33 is nowt for a heavyweight. He's got a minimum of seven years before he'll start to slide, particularly with his type of style. He could go until well in his forties.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 16:45
by Counter-puncher
JimStone wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 16:42
33 is nowt for a heavyweight. He's got a minimum of seven years before he'll start to slide,
particularly with his type of style
Getting punched repeatedly in the face by 18 stone men is conducive to longevity?
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 16:48
by oogiebe
Counter-puncher wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 16:45
Getting punched repeatedly in the face by 18 stone men is conducive to longevity?
He's a banger. He has five years.
Re: Joe Joyce
Posted: 20 May 2019, 16:55
by Counter-puncher
oogiebe wrote: ↑20 May 2019, 16:48
He's a banger. He has five years.
Maybe, he also has the kind of defence that could end his career in two or three bad fights if it goes wrong, IMO