Page 3 of 3
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 15:40
by Nondescript
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:03
Not sure. Korobov is getting old.
The reason I ask is because Andrade was more than willing to fight BJS and then obviously Saunders ended up failing a drug test.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 15:47
by apollo creed
Nondescript wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:40
The reason I ask is because Andrade was more than willing to fight BJS and then obviously Saunders ended up failing a drug test.
Yeah , Andrade had no problem. BJS screwed it.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 16:36
by boxing_rocks
Nondescript wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 15:40
The reason I ask is because Andrade was more than willing to fight BJS and then obviously Saunders ended up failing a drug test.
IDK. Maybe Hearn told Andrade that he has to fight BJS if he wants higher purses.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 17:41
by SenorPipino
Andrade outboxes Charlo, who doesn't appear to be anything terribly special.
Charlo has been a pro about 11 years and he still doesn't appear seasoned.
Andrade might put viewers to sleep but he's effective. Talented. Charlo would be lost for 12 rounds.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 21:09
by ClivePatrickLyons
Andrade style is strange and fights like he is scared maybe even very scared to be tagged even against the polish guy the other night who aint no power puncher I cannot see him beating GGG or Canelo and id back Jermall Charlo to defeat him.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 21:44
by Rgoodwin
Andrade will never be fun to watch but I think his style is a nightmare for anyone at Middleweight. He beats Charlo.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 01 Jul 2019, 22:45
by Lackeos
apollo creed wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 12:51
"a better 160lbs fighter", NOT a better 154-160lbs fighter.
154-pound boxing and 160-pound boxing is actually the same sport. It's not like they were playing baseball at 154 pounds.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 02 Jul 2019, 09:38
by boxing_rocks
Opponents with good footwork would just need to get inside where Andrade is vulnerable. I can't say for sure whether Charlo can do that, but even Vanes could.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 02 Jul 2019, 16:11
by NateJR
I'd favor Andrade and heavily. I'm not real impressed with either Charlo and really see them looking helpless against a guy like Andrade. Andrade does have a ameaturish style though, but he's really fast and sharp defensively.
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 02 Jul 2019, 17:03
by Cent0089
They can fight and we will see
Re: Do you consider Andrade a better 160lbs fighter than Jermall Charlo?
Posted: 02 Jul 2019, 17:24
by Onetimeonly
NateJR wrote: ↑02 Jul 2019, 16:11
I'd favor Andrade and heavily. I'm not real impressed with either Charlo and really see them looking helpless against a guy like Andrade. Andrade does have a ameaturish style though, but he's really fast and sharp defensively.
We have to see if andrade is as effective against better competition. He's certainly not come close to anything like jermalls demolition of jrock. The most impressive thing about charlo to me is his patience behind his jab. 50/50 to me.