Page 3 of 3

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 08 Sep 2020, 14:05
by Ambling Alp II
Don't think you will find too many people who think Lewis won 21 of 24 rounds against Holyfield. Have never heard anyone say the first fight should have been 12-0 in rounds, though I am sure there is someone out there. Then 9-3 in the rematch? 21-3 overall? It's an absurd opinion. How does this work, if Lewis throws a punch, he wins the round?
Sorry I mean Castillo, not Marquez. Almost everyone thinks Castillo got hosed. Not you apparently.
You have mentioned Hipp on a couple of threads. Big win for Morrison apparently. A great fight in another thread. Never said it was on this thread. So I am not a liar or a lair. :D
The Morrison-Bentt might be favorite though. The "too much partying" excuse from his trainer. Gotta love it.

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 05:21
by DrDuke
Ambling Alp II wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 14:05 Don't think you will find too many people who think Lewis won 21 of 24 rounds against Holyfield. Have never heard anyone say the first fight should have been 12-0 in rounds, though I am sure there is someone out there. Then 9-3 in the rematch? 21-3 overall? It's an absurd opinion. How does this work, if Lewis throws a punch, he wins the round?
Never heard anyone say this? Maybe it's better not to listen to anybody, but just to watch the fight yourself? Cause it wasn't about Lewis throwing a punch in a round and winning it based on this, it was about Lewis outlanding Holyfield round after round. We've discussed that already FFS.
Ambling Alp II wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 14:05 Sorry I mean Castillo, not Marquez. Almost everyone thinks Castillo got hosed. Not you apparently.
Again pointing at someone else thinking something. :doh: Go watch it. Cause it's not likely that you watched it, as you were saying, that Mayweather was getting hit through all the fight there.
Ambling Alp II wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 14:05 You have mentioned Hipp on a couple of threads. Big win for Morrison apparently. A great fight in another thread. Never said it was on this thread. So I am not a liar or a lair. :D
Oops! I didn't mention it in our recent Morrison discussion either, which in Rudduck-Sanders thread. How come?

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 13:28
by Ambling Alp II
Whatever.

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 06:16
by DrDuke
Ambling Alp II wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 13:28 Whatever.
You favorite word, when there're no more arguments. :OhYes:

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 16:29
by Ambling Alp II
It means I have made enough arguments but you don't get anything. Not worth going on anymore. You can have the last word on this weighty subject if you want.

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 16:36
by oogiebe
Ambling Alp II wrote: 10 Sep 2020, 16:29 It means I have made enough arguments but you don't get anything. Not worth going on anymore. You can have the last word on this weighty subject if you want.
Oh he will.

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 21:01
by Onetimeonly
oogiebe wrote: 10 Sep 2020, 16:36
Ambling Alp II wrote: 10 Sep 2020, 16:29 It means I have made enough arguments but you don't get anything. Not worth going on anymore. You can have the last word on this weighty subject if you want.
Oh he will.
:lol:

Re: Bruno v Wlad K

Posted: 12 Sep 2020, 08:55
by Cojimar 1946
Ambling Alp II wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 14:05 Don't think you will find too many people who think Lewis won 21 of 24 rounds against Holyfield. Have never heard anyone say the first fight should have been 12-0 in rounds, though I am sure there is someone out there. Then 9-3 in the rematch? 21-3 overall? It's an absurd opinion. How does this work, if Lewis throws a punch, he wins the round?
Sorry I mean Castillo, not Marquez. Almost everyone thinks Castillo got hosed. Not you apparently.
You have mentioned Hipp on a couple of threads. Big win for Morrison apparently. A great fight in another thread. Never said it was on this thread. So I am not a liar or a lair. :D
The Morrison-Bentt might be favorite though. The "too much partying" excuse from his trainer. Gotta love it.
Some of what he says seems a tad odd but I think picking Povetkin or even Pulev over Bruno is far-fetched.

Povetkin has had a better career than Bruno by a fair margin and certainly appears to hold a number of advantages like better combination punching, better chin, ability to survive rough moments, etc. Povetkin has shown the ability to come back from adversity whereas Bruno doesn't seem to recover well from getting hurt.