Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9186
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Tyson was never going to have a long career at the top, he was too unstable mentally and he let the fame, money and women affect his training and desire. Holyfield had a winning mindset, dedication to training and mentally he was very strong.
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
In Mikes defence he was the most famous boxer since Ali and probably on someone like Dempsey or Sullivan rivalled him in fame at their peak. While I don't disagree with the above, the fame most fighters have or had (including Holyfield) is nothing like the fame Mike had. I can't imagine that level of fame being helpful to any fighter, Ali aside.
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9186
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Tyson was a bully, after Cus he was surrounded by yes men, spongers and wrong 'uns. He was what he was, a delinquent with anger issues sprinkled with mental health problems who hit the big time. He was always an accident waiting to happen. If it wasn't for boxing he'd probably be dead or in prison.p4p1 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020, 06:59 In Mikes defence he was the most famous boxer since Ali and probably on someone like Dempsey or Sullivan rivalled him in fame at their peak. While I don't disagree with the above, the fame most fighters have or had (including Holyfield) is nothing like the fame Mike had. I can't imagine that level of fame being helpful to any fighter, Ali aside.
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Other than it was after he fired Rooney and Jacobs or Cayton that he was surrounded by yes men, I don't disagree with any of that.Controversial wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020, 07:22Tyson was a bully, after Cus he was surrounded by yes men, spongers and wrong 'uns. He was what he was, a delinquent with anger issues sprinkled with mental health problems who hit the big time. He was always an accident waiting to happen. If it wasn't for boxing he'd probably be dead or in prison.p4p1 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020, 06:59 In Mikes defence he was the most famous boxer since Ali and probably on someone like Dempsey or Sullivan rivalled him in fame at their peak. While I don't disagree with the above, the fame most fighters have or had (including Holyfield) is nothing like the fame Mike had. I can't imagine that level of fame being helpful to any fighter, Ali aside.
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Tyson just wasn’t mentally strong enough to handle his situation, at least he popular, can you imagine him having to go through what Jack Johnson went through? All of white society against him and probably every crowd at every fight against him and he handled it like a boss and usually with a smile on his face.
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
-
Djanders44
- Welterweight
- Posts: 190
- Joined: 02 Jan 2016, 00:43
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Not in my opinion. And not because I am down on Tyson. I believe there are many heavyweight champions through the ages, who could not hang in there against Mike's attack. It is just that I rank Holyfield higher than most do. I consider him in the top three of all time as a Heavyweight. In any event, he is a notch above Mike, IMO.
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Holyfield's all wrong for Mike. Always would've been. No matter when they fought. Even if they fought tonight.Djanders44 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2020, 16:43 Not in my opinion. And not because I am down on Tyson. I believe there are many heavyweight champions through the ages, who could not hang in there against Mike's attack. It is just that I rank Holyfield higher than most do. I consider him in the top three of all time as a Heavyweight. In any event, he is a notch above Mike, IMO.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Yet he somehow still managed to father 88 kids by 119 womenControversial wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020, 05:57 Tyson was never going to have a long career at the top, he was too unstable mentally and he let the fame, money and women affect his training and desire. Holyfield had a winning mindset, dedication to training and mentally he was very strong.
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

-
AntonioMartin
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
The Holy(field) bunch..bollocks wrote: ↑28 Nov 2020, 20:17Yet he somehow still managed to father 88 kids by 119 womenControversial wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020, 05:57 Tyson was never going to have a long career at the top, he was too unstable mentally and he let the fame, money and women affect his training and desire. Holyfield had a winning mindset, dedication to training and mentally he was very strong.![]()
-
AntonioMartin
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they were supposed to fight in '91. I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they finally fought. I picked Tyson over Holyfield in the rematch. If they were to have a "Legends Exhibition" today, I might just pick Tyson.
With that understood, Holyfield is 2-0 in their series. He knocked the man out the first time (which, incidentally, was also one of the all time great career comebacks) and, for all intents and purposes, made him quit the second time. Arguing Tyson's superiority is an insult.
With that understood, Holyfield is 2-0 in their series. He knocked the man out the first time (which, incidentally, was also one of the all time great career comebacks) and, for all intents and purposes, made him quit the second time. Arguing Tyson's superiority is an insult.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Holyfield wasn't light years better, but he was clearly better. Tyson was great; Holyfield was greater.
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
If they were to fight tomorrow I'd definitely still be taking Holyfield.bwu wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 21:30 I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they were supposed to fight in '91. I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they finally fought. I picked Tyson over Holyfield in the rematch. If they were to have a "Legends Exhibition" today, I might just pick Tyson.
With that understood, Holyfield is 2-0 in their series. He knocked the man out the first time (which, incidentally, was also one of the all time great career comebacks) and, for all intents and purposes, made him quit the second time. Arguing Tyson's superiority is an insult.
I can't say I would've picked Holyfield in 1991 or 1996 as I was too young to care, but like most at the time I probably would've favored Tyson because he was the more well known and famous fighter.
With the knowledge I have now though, I can't see Holyfield ever losing to Mike.
Not even in 1989.
Buster Douglas beat the sh*t out of Tyson in pretty much one sided fashion. In his very next fight Holyfield knocked out Douglas in 3 with minimal difficulty.
That's yet another example of how he was better. Aside from the 2 head to head victories.
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
And no security guards or police to help him. A hostile crowd then was really a very dangerous place.littlepug wrote: ↑16 Nov 2020, 08:29 Tyson just wasn’t mentally strong enough to handle his situation, at least he popular, can you imagine him having to go through what Jack Johnson went through? All of white society against him and probably every crowd at every fight against him and he handled it like a boss and usually with a smile on his face.
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
I looked back at her playboy, she had great tits but a terrible crabbit as fûck face.AntonioMartin wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 07:29She is too Black for his taste!
(I personally think she is gorgeous)
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1704
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Holyfield beats Tyson H2H but realistically there are probably guys Holyfield loses to who Tyson beats.
Holyfield lost to Moorer and I've yet to meet anyone who ranks Moorer ahead of Tyson.
Holyfield lost to Moorer and I've yet to meet anyone who ranks Moorer ahead of Tyson.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
True, and that should count against Holyfield. He still was better than Tyson.
You have to count head to head, common opponents, losses to fighters they should have beat, big wins. To some degree you have consider as objectively as you can how good the fighters looked on film. Holyfield was better.
Overall, Tyson was the third best hw of his era; of course in many eras he would have been #1.
You have to count head to head, common opponents, losses to fighters they should have beat, big wins. To some degree you have consider as objectively as you can how good the fighters looked on film. Holyfield was better.
Overall, Tyson was the third best hw of his era; of course in many eras he would have been #1.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
Holyfield was badly injured when he lost to Moorer, and destroyed him with five KDs in the rematch when he was uninjured.
-
AntonioMartin
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield
That proved to be a misdiagnosis but a quarter of a century later the story persists