Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9186
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Controversial »

Tyson was never going to have a long career at the top, he was too unstable mentally and he let the fame, money and women affect his training and desire. Holyfield had a winning mindset, dedication to training and mentally he was very strong.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by p4p1 »

In Mikes defence he was the most famous boxer since Ali and probably on someone like Dempsey or Sullivan rivalled him in fame at their peak. While I don't disagree with the above, the fame most fighters have or had (including Holyfield) is nothing like the fame Mike had. I can't imagine that level of fame being helpful to any fighter, Ali aside.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9186
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Controversial »

p4p1 wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 06:59 In Mikes defence he was the most famous boxer since Ali and probably on someone like Dempsey or Sullivan rivalled him in fame at their peak. While I don't disagree with the above, the fame most fighters have or had (including Holyfield) is nothing like the fame Mike had. I can't imagine that level of fame being helpful to any fighter, Ali aside.
Tyson was a bully, after Cus he was surrounded by yes men, spongers and wrong 'uns. He was what he was, a delinquent with anger issues sprinkled with mental health problems who hit the big time. He was always an accident waiting to happen. If it wasn't for boxing he'd probably be dead or in prison.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by p4p1 »

Controversial wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 07:22
p4p1 wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 06:59 In Mikes defence he was the most famous boxer since Ali and probably on someone like Dempsey or Sullivan rivalled him in fame at their peak. While I don't disagree with the above, the fame most fighters have or had (including Holyfield) is nothing like the fame Mike had. I can't imagine that level of fame being helpful to any fighter, Ali aside.
Tyson was a bully, after Cus he was surrounded by yes men, spongers and wrong 'uns. He was what he was, a delinquent with anger issues sprinkled with mental health problems who hit the big time. He was always an accident waiting to happen. If it wasn't for boxing he'd probably be dead or in prison.
Other than it was after he fired Rooney and Jacobs or Cayton that he was surrounded by yes men, I don't disagree with any of that.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by littlepug »

Tyson just wasn’t mentally strong enough to handle his situation, at least he popular, can you imagine him having to go through what Jack Johnson went through? All of white society against him and probably every crowd at every fight against him and he handled it like a boss and usually with a smile on his face.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by gilgamesh »

No
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2697
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Jaywheel »

Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
Djanders44
Welterweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 02 Jan 2016, 00:43

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Djanders44 »

Not in my opinion. And not because I am down on Tyson. I believe there are many heavyweight champions through the ages, who could not hang in there against Mike's attack. It is just that I rank Holyfield higher than most do. I consider him in the top three of all time as a Heavyweight. In any event, he is a notch above Mike, IMO.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by gilgamesh »

Djanders44 wrote: 28 Nov 2020, 16:43 Not in my opinion. And not because I am down on Tyson. I believe there are many heavyweight champions through the ages, who could not hang in there against Mike's attack. It is just that I rank Holyfield higher than most do. I consider him in the top three of all time as a Heavyweight. In any event, he is a notch above Mike, IMO.
Holyfield's all wrong for Mike. Always would've been. No matter when they fought. Even if they fought tonight.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Jaywheel wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 12:32 Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
Come on, Jack Johnson wouldn't have looked twice at Robin Givens
bollocks
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1409
Joined: 18 Oct 2016, 04:54

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by bollocks »

Controversial wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 05:57 Tyson was never going to have a long career at the top, he was too unstable mentally and he let the fame, money and women affect his training and desire. Holyfield had a winning mindset, dedication to training and mentally he was very strong.
Yet he somehow still managed to father 88 kids by 119 women :OhYes:
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Wee Tommy »

Jaywheel wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 12:32 Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
He’d have had both mum and daughter grafting on the street.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Wee Tommy wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 05:28
Jaywheel wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 12:32 Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
He’d have had both mum and daughter grafting on the street.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
AntonioMartin
Middleweight
Posts: 1690
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by AntonioMartin »

bollocks wrote: 28 Nov 2020, 20:17
Controversial wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 05:57 Tyson was never going to have a long career at the top, he was too unstable mentally and he let the fame, money and women affect his training and desire. Holyfield had a winning mindset, dedication to training and mentally he was very strong.
Yet he somehow still managed to father 88 kids by 119 women :OhYes:
The Holy(field) bunch.. :lol:
AntonioMartin
Middleweight
Posts: 1690
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by AntonioMartin »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 28 Nov 2020, 17:54
Jaywheel wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 12:32 Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
Come on, Jack Johnson wouldn't have looked twice at Robin Givens
She is too Black for his taste!

(I personally think she is gorgeous)
bwu
Middleweight
Posts: 430
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 20:08

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by bwu »

I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they were supposed to fight in '91. I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they finally fought. I picked Tyson over Holyfield in the rematch. If they were to have a "Legends Exhibition" today, I might just pick Tyson.

With that understood, Holyfield is 2-0 in their series. He knocked the man out the first time (which, incidentally, was also one of the all time great career comebacks) and, for all intents and purposes, made him quit the second time. Arguing Tyson's superiority is an insult.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15184
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Holyfield wasn't light years better, but he was clearly better. Tyson was great; Holyfield was greater.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by gilgamesh »

bwu wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 21:30 I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they were supposed to fight in '91. I picked Tyson over Holyfield when they finally fought. I picked Tyson over Holyfield in the rematch. If they were to have a "Legends Exhibition" today, I might just pick Tyson.

With that understood, Holyfield is 2-0 in their series. He knocked the man out the first time (which, incidentally, was also one of the all time great career comebacks) and, for all intents and purposes, made him quit the second time. Arguing Tyson's superiority is an insult.
If they were to fight tomorrow I'd definitely still be taking Holyfield.

I can't say I would've picked Holyfield in 1991 or 1996 as I was too young to care, but like most at the time I probably would've favored Tyson because he was the more well known and famous fighter.

With the knowledge I have now though, I can't see Holyfield ever losing to Mike.

Not even in 1989.

Buster Douglas beat the sh*t out of Tyson in pretty much one sided fashion. In his very next fight Holyfield knocked out Douglas in 3 with minimal difficulty.

That's yet another example of how he was better. Aside from the 2 head to head victories.
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Wee Tommy »

littlepug wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 08:29 Tyson just wasn’t mentally strong enough to handle his situation, at least he popular, can you imagine him having to go through what Jack Johnson went through? All of white society against him and probably every crowd at every fight against him and he handled it like a boss and usually with a smile on his face.
And no security guards or police to help him. A hostile crowd then was really a very dangerous place.
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Wee Tommy »

:OhYes:
AntonioMartin wrote: 29 Nov 2020, 07:29
Tuan_Jim wrote: 28 Nov 2020, 17:54
Jaywheel wrote: 16 Nov 2020, 12:32 Can you imagine Jack Johnson dealing with the Givens? That's some SERIOUS drama.
Come on, Jack Johnson wouldn't have looked twice at Robin Givens
She is too Black for his taste!

(I personally think she is gorgeous)
I looked back at her playboy, she had great tits but a terrible crabbit as fûck face.
Cojimar 1946
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1704
Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Cojimar 1946 »

Holyfield beats Tyson H2H but realistically there are probably guys Holyfield loses to who Tyson beats.

Holyfield lost to Moorer and I've yet to meet anyone who ranks Moorer ahead of Tyson.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15184
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Ambling Alp II »

True, and that should count against Holyfield. He still was better than Tyson.
You have to count head to head, common opponents, losses to fighters they should have beat, big wins. To some degree you have consider as objectively as you can how good the fighters looked on film. Holyfield was better.
Overall, Tyson was the third best hw of his era; of course in many eras he would have been #1.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Holyfield was badly injured when he lost to Moorer, and destroyed him with five KDs in the rematch when he was uninjured.
AntonioMartin
Middleweight
Posts: 1690
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by AntonioMartin »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 13:18 Holyfield was badly injured when he lost to Moorer, and destroyed him with five KDs in the rematch when he was uninjured.
Supposedly had a heart condition, too.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mike Tyson better than Holyfield

Post by Tuan_Jim »

AntonioMartin wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 19:03
Tuan_Jim wrote: 30 Nov 2020, 13:18 Holyfield was badly injured when he lost to Moorer, and destroyed him with five KDs in the rematch when he was uninjured.
Supposedly had a heart condition, too.
That proved to be a misdiagnosis but a quarter of a century later the story persists
Post Reply