Page 3 of 3
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 12:29
by stujones
Wtf was that recent interview between mjp and ben Davison....it was the most blatant plug for an energy drink company going. Clearly set up, but at times even Ben looked uncomfortable at the amount of time mjp was plugging her favourite flavour
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 12:42
by coghaugen11
It was exactly the same in the old days, The Mickey1975 said.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 12:57
by mickey1975
stujones wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 12:29
Wtf was that recent interview between mjp and ben Davison....it was the most blatant plug for an energy drink company going. Clearly set up, but at times even Ben looked uncomfortable at the amount of time mjp was plugging her favourite flavour
She did it with Taylor as well.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 12:57
by mickey1975
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 12:42
It was exactly the same in the old days, The Mickey1975 said.
They weren't around then....
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 12:59
by maverick23
stujones wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 12:29
Wtf was that recent interview between mjp and ben Davison....it was the most blatant plug for an energy drink company going. Clearly set up, but at times even Ben looked uncomfortable at the amount of time mjp was plugging her favourite flavour
Yeah - I listened to that earlier. Really weird. I understand the need for advertising in the videos but that was just a bit creepy.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 13:28
by JamesPhilips
MJP is awful
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 13:33
by Boxerbeetle
I don’t usually watch MJP but will seek out those videos, always find awkward product placement hilarious.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 15:05
by stujones
I used to find her trademark laugh infectious, but now she just laughs these big belly laughs for no reason - "Katie you need to hold the mic higher..... ha ha ha ha "
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 15:21
by Muttley
Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2021, 07:30
I hope they are all making decent money. Once the novelty has worn off, it's a tedious existence traipsing up and down the motorways, being at shows until oh fornicate o'clock, talking to people who are, in the main, dull, arsekissing, travelling overseas, editing for hours, living out of a suitcase, etc. They work hard for their daily bread.
I'd honestly rather do 10 hours a day on a shovel amd be home with a bottle of beer and my feet up for six o'clock than do what they do.
Spot on
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 16:07
by high tower 1
Muttley wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 15:21
Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2021, 07:30
I hope they are all making decent money. Once the novelty has worn off, it's a tedious existence traipsing up and down the motorways, being at shows until oh fornicate o'clock, talking to people who are, in the main, dull, arsekissing, travelling overseas, editing for hours, living out of a suitcase, etc. They work hard for their daily bread.
I'd honestly rather do 10 hours a day on a shovel amd be home with a bottle of beer and my feet up for six o'clock than do what they do.
Spot on
How much can they make ??? Even IFL. Doubt the ad revenue is that good.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 16:16
by maverick23
high tower 1 wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 16:07
Muttley wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 15:21
Jimmy2020 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2021, 07:30
I hope they are all making decent money. Once the novelty has worn off, it's a tedious existence traipsing up and down the motorways, being at shows until oh fornicate o'clock, talking to people who are, in the main, dull, arsekissing, travelling overseas, editing for hours, living out of a suitcase, etc. They work hard for their daily bread.
I'd honestly rather do 10 hours a day on a shovel amd be home with a bottle of beer and my feet up for six o'clock than do what they do.
Spot on
How much can they make ??? Even IFL. Doubt the ad revenue is that good.
Kugan does well for himself. He’ll get most expenses paid (at Matchroom shows at least), YTube ad revenue and then sponsorship revenue from whoever’s paying for the ads at the start/end of all of their videos. They’ll probably be getting 10s of millions of video views each month.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 16:19
by margaret thatcher
i knew someone who was getting hundreds of thousands of views per video, and had a video of 15m , and they were not making all that much on it, ppl overestimate how much youtubers get just from ad views, they gotta have those sponsorships and sh!t
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 17:04
by mickey1975
Porky's source said MTK and Matchroom pay Kugan £100,000 a year.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 17:12
by maverick23
mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 17:04
Porky's source said MTK and Matchroom pay Kugan £100,000 a year.
He’d double that with YouTube ad revenue and other sponsors. I’m surprised Matchroom pay him though. Expenses I get but why pay him? He’s not going to stop going to shows if they stop paying him.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 17:45
by mickey1975
maverick23 wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 17:12
mickey1975 wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 17:04
Porky's source said MTK and Matchroom pay Kugan £100,000 a year.
He’d double that with YouTube ad revenue and other sponsors. I’m surprised Matchroom pay him though. Expenses I get but why pay him? He’s not going to stop going to shows if they stop paying him.
He's obviously heavily into Matchroom. Porky says a lot of very near the knuckle things.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 18:05
by stujones
My pet hate is Kugan calling Hearn "Edward" - it annoys the hell out of me. None of the other interviewers do that its like "oh he's my mate i can do that".
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 21 May 2021, 18:46
by Coco
stujones wrote: ↑21 May 2021, 18:05
My pet hate is Kugan calling Hearn "Edward" - it annoys the hell out of me. None of the other interviewers do that its like "oh he's my mate i can do that".
Eubank does it too

Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 22 May 2021, 03:49
by garethhop
I watched 3 mins of a Porky video last night. Never seen him before. He was complaining that Kugan was giving his phone number out. And saying that Kugan had given Joshuas phone number out to Fury. And that if Kugan gave out his phone number again then he, Porky, would give out Kugans phone number. All whilst dressed in sunglasses against a green screen asking for people to give him £5.99 a month.
Boxing eh?
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 22 May 2021, 04:38
by Oleksandr...Oleksandr...Oleksandr...
IFL McCart was hard work in the Canelo Saunders fight week.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 22 May 2021, 07:12
by maverick23
I quite like him. Much prefer him to Umar IFL Umar.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 22 May 2021, 07:46
by Counter-puncher
garethhop wrote: ↑22 May 2021, 03:49
I watched 3 mins of a Porky video last night. Never seen him before. He was complaining that Kugan was giving his phone number out. And saying that Kugan had given Joshuas phone number out to Fury. And that if Kugan gave out his phone number again then he, Porky, would give out Kugans phone number. All whilst dressed in sunglasses against a green screen asking for people to give him £5.99 a month.
Boxing eh?

Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 22 May 2021, 09:12
by mickey1975
I've only just come across this bloke The YB. He's a lunatic.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 24 May 2021, 13:51
by mickey1975
Kugan has just done over an hour with Eddie and whilst Eddie blames Bob for everything, Warren and Tyson a bit, Kugan never once asked why MTK weren't involved. Surely as Furys managers, they should have been involved in the negotiations. They never got mentioned. 258 did. The BJS thing was completely glossed over.
What struck me was Eddie saying he'd already done a video for Matchroom Media and in future every fighter will have to enter the hotel from the Wednesday so he can get proper access for the team he's assembling to provide content. He really is going full Dana White. I bet he meets up with him in Vegas this week again.
Re: IFL v Boxing Social
Posted: 24 May 2021, 13:58
by maverick23
mickey1975 wrote: ↑24 May 2021, 13:51
Kugan has just done over an hour with Eddie and whilst Eddie blames Bob for everything, Warren and Tyson a bit, Kugan never once asked why MTK weren't involved. Surely as Furys managers, they should have been involved in the negotiations. They never got mentioned. 258 did. The BJS thing was completely glossed over.
What struck me was Eddie saying he'd already done a video for Matchroom Media and in future every fighter will have to enter the hotel from the Wednesday so he can get proper access for the team he's assembling to provide content. He really is going full Dana White. I bet he meets up with him in Vegas this week again.
It makes sense to be honest. The social media/YouTube stuff for the Canelo/BJS fight was massive. Particularly compared to how the Taylor/Ramirez fight was promoted. I know neither are Canelo but, at least in the U.K., it got nowhere the coverage it should have received pre and post fight.
Not sure why Eddie didn’t mention MTK. Probably doesn’t want to piss them off given they manage several fighters he’s worked/working with. He was clearly pissed about the AJ/Fury stuff and rightly so I think. Bob’s been telling anyone and everyone the Wilder stuff wasn’t an issue and given how post announcement of the arbitration going in Wilder’s favour Bob and FW weren’t on the same page at all so not really sure how much FW gets involved. Fury should be pissed about it too.