Page 3 of 4

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 06:28
by Ruthless-RKO
DAZN, 2:00 pm ET

From Klagenfurt, Austria:

Hrgovic (12-0, 10 KO) takes on Montenegro’s Marko Radonjic (22-0, 22 KO), who has quite the flashy looking record when you type it out like that for a 31-year-old guy who’s ranked No. 231 in the world by BoxRec. He’s never fought anyone good and mostly has fought complete cans. Other than getting Hrgovic a fight, this is pretty pointless, but it is getting Hrgovic a fight.

Since it’s Matchroom, there are also fights on the card for super middleweight John Ryder and junior welterweight prospect Dalton Smith, both facing club-level opponents.

Also notable, uh, kinda: Former European heavyweight champion Zeljko Mavrovic will be fighting for the first time since his 1998 loss to Lennox Lewis. Mavrovic is 52 years old.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 06:35
by margaret thatcher
croation super fight, hrg vs zeljky next

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 07:05
by DrDuke
Holyfield and Mavrovic are back, Larry Holmes is next (against Chuck Norris).

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 09:18
by adislav123
won't take hrgovic more than 2 rounds to dispose of this guy if he means business.

he also won't carry him any longer than that, the risk of a lucky punch at heavyweight and a huuge embarrassing fall back in his 'quest' for a title is to big IF this isn't a fixed affair anyways.

k.o. round 2 hrgovic.

frikkin step it up. even as a stay busy fight this shit is an atrocity.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56
by candyslim
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 04:28 This is going to portray myself as a bitter and twisted individual, but part of me wants to see Filip Hrgovic lose his fight against the outrageously abysmal Marko Radonjic.

It’s not because I’m a so-called “hater” of Hrgovic, it’s just that I’ve lost patience with the Croatian hype job.

He’s been competing as a pro for four years, but his career hasn’t progressed one iota since his debut!

Hrgovic just keeps engaging in hideously obscene mismatches!

For sure, I realise he might have talent and potential, but he’s made himself irrelevant by continually facing clueless no-hopers.

Therefore, I want to see him lose, because he might need a kick up the backside to start taking his career seriously!
While I share your extreme frustration, Hrgovic was willing to fight Michael Hunter for about $275k but Hunter turned the fight down for 150% of what Hrgovic was getting. The winner would be made mandatory for Joshua's IBF belt and could be sure that Joshua would defend against him provided he still had the title to defend. As I understand it Hrgovic has ruled out no opponent and is satisfied with the money on offer for the chance to earn a guaranteed title shot.

The IBF are sticklers for their rules so we can be confident they have offered the fight to fighters ranked below Hunter in their listings yet it doesn't look like anybody is wanting to fight Hrgovic for the money on offer even if winning guarantees a title shot. Unless I've misunderstood the situation it seems wrong to blame the one fighter who is willing to fight anyone nominated by the IBF for the money on offer.

Now you may want to blame Matchroom for failing to back Hrgovic financially, but Matchroom is Eddie Hearn whose main priority is Anthony Joshua. You have ask why Eddie Hearn would invest good money to secure a fight for a Croatian fighter which won't be a hit at the box-office, purely in order to get Hrgovic a shot at Joshua. If Eddie sees Hrgovic the same way I do, he's not going to spend big money to buy his man AJ a banana-skin to place at the top of his stairs is he?

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 12:16
by Enlightened-One
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56Hrgovic was willing to fight Michael Hunter for about $275k but Hunter turned the fight down for 150% of what Hrgovic was getting.
Hunter is capable of earning around the same sum or possibly even more facing far easier opposition (as per the terms of his deal with Triller).

I accurately predicted that Hunter would reject the Hrgovic bout, because the purse being offered was far too small. The situation mirrored Dillian Whyte’s reasoning for rejecting the Kubrat Pulev bout.

The Croatian might be more amenable to fight for paltry purses, because he’s a commercially unpopular fighter that constantly engages in meaningless and unnecessarily obscene mismatches.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56The winner would be made mandatory for Joshua's IBF belt and could be sure that Joshua would defend against him provided he still had the title to defend.
AJ will not be obliged to perform a mandatory defence of his IBF title any sooner than 2023.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56As I understand it Hrgovic has ruled out no opponent and is satisfied with the money on offer for the chance to earn a guaranteed title shot.
Hrgovic's handlers don't seem to have much faith in him, because they won't invest in meaningful bouts.

World-rated fighters require decent paydays, which costs money.

If the Sauerland’s are unwilling to speculate, then this suggests they have little faith in their ability to eventually accumulate.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56 The IBF are sticklers for their rules so we can be confident they have offered the fight to fighters ranked below Hunter in their listings yet it doesn't look like anybody is wanting to fight Hrgovic for the money on offer even if winning guarantees a title shot.
This is your assumption.

There is no evidence of other fighters, not named Hunter, having rejected decent payday offers to face Hrgovic.

A gentle reminder, AJ will not be obliged to perform a mandatory defence of his IBF title any sooner than 2023.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56Unless I've misunderstood the situation it seems wrong to blame the one fighter who is willing to fight anyone nominated by the IBF for the money on offer.
I blame the Sauerlands (now operating as Wasserman). They won't fund decent fights.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56 Now you may want to blame Matchroom for failing to back Hrgovic financially, but Matchroom is Eddie Hearn whose main priority is Anthony Joshua.
Matchroom is partially responsible, though I'm led to believe Hearn's affiliation with Hrgovic has technically ended.

However, I feel that the Sauerland's are mainly responsible.

Anyway, back to your point... heavyweight fighters affiliated with the Matchroom stable have generally done well (i.e. Chisora, Whyte, Allen, Parker, Usyk, Price etc.).
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56You have ask why Eddie Hearn would invest good money to secure a fight for a Croatian fighter which won't be a hit at the box-office, purely in order to get Hrgovic a shot at Joshua. If Eddie sees Hrgovic the same way I do, he's not going to spend big money to buy his man AJ a banana-skin to place at the top of his stairs is he?
It’s not as if Hrgovic’s handlers (the Sauerland's) are doing their upmost to build a loyal fanbase, because as well as constantly engaging in hideously obscene mismatches, Filip seems to fight in a different country every time he competes (i.e. Croatia, Latvia, Germany, USA, Denmark, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Austria etc.).

Established world-rated fighters aren’t going to take a significant pay cut to fight an anonymous unproven prospect that has no fan-base.

For the record, Matchroom and Wasserman (formerly Sauerland) are now rivals, since they provide boxing content for rival networks (i.e. DAZN vs. Sky).

I believe that Hearn is still buddies with the Sauerland's, but their network rivalry may make fights between both teams more challenging/complicated, which will very likely hinder Hrgovic's options/opportunities.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 16:03
by Ruthless-RKO
Anyone is the US watching?

Hows the stream?

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 16:32
by gregregegg
Weird they have this in a stadium but just over onto one side.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 16:57
by margaret thatcher
lol how many f@cking knockdowns was that...what a comedy :lol:

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 17:01
by JxhDel.
Completely useless card, four KDs and they didn't even stop that... shameful.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 17:06
by Ruthless-RKO
Shit card these Euro ones..

Not worth the tickets.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 17:23
by JxhDel.
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 17:06 Shit card these Euro ones..

Not worth the tickets.
This was one of the worst I have seen on DAZN since subscribing three years ago. Made some B-level British events look like the finest Golden Boy nights.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 10 Sep 2021, 19:55
by peter barlow
Absolute rubbish, and the matchmaking woeful. DAZN need to get their act together.

As for Hrgovic, he isn't improving but with opposition like that how could he. I also don't believe as has been said before that he is being avoided by everyone.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 06:01
by candyslim
Enlightened-One wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 12:16
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56Hrgovic was willing to fight Michael Hunter for about $275k but Hunter turned the fight down for 150% of what Hrgovic was getting.
Hunter is capable of earning around the same sum or possibly even more facing far easier opposition (as per the terms of his deal with Triller).

cs: Hunter was totally within his rights to reject the offer/opportunity, I don't dispute that, although one might consider a truly confident fighter might back himself to win and secure a big payday and a shot at the title. I can fully understand why Hunter might prefer to take an easier opponent for the kind of money on offer.

I accurately predicted that Hunter would reject the Hrgovic bout, because the purse being offered was far too small. The situation mirrored Dillian Whyte’s reasoning for rejecting the Kubrat Pulev bout.

cs: You definitely did, I remember your post. It wasn't a complete shock though was it? Fair dos though you called it I was quiet

The Croatian might be more amenable to fight for paltry purses, because he’s a commercially unpopular fighter that constantly engages in meaningless and unnecessarily obscene mismatches.

cs: That maybe so. If he can't get a quality opponent he probably thinks any fight is better than no fight.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56The winner would be made mandatory for Joshua's IBF belt and could be sure that Joshua would defend against him provided he still had the title to defend.
AJ will not be obliged to perform a mandatory defence of his IBF title any sooner than 2023.

cs: That will be upon us soon enough. History confirms he won't be allowed to be avoided forever by the belt-holder.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56As I understand it Hrgovic has ruled out no opponent and is satisfied with the money on offer for the chance to earn a guaranteed title shot.
Hrgovic's handlers don't seem to have much faith in him, because they won't invest in meaningful bouts.

cs: I don't know how much financial muscle Sauerlands have post covid, but I would seriously doubt they lack faith in his ability. If you are pointing the finger at Matchroom their man is Joshua. It makes little sense for them to invest a lot of money into building a platform for the man who might turn out to be Joshua's nemesis.

World-rated fighters require decent paydays, which costs money.

cs: They need incentives certainly. That can be money or opportunity. Obviously opportunity requires self-belief because opportunity is little reward if you don't believe you can seize it.

If the Sauerland’s are unwilling to speculate, then this suggests they have little faith in their ability to eventually accumulate.

cs: See my second last comment above.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56 The IBF are sticklers for their rules so we can be confident they have offered the fight to fighters ranked below Hunter in their listings yet it doesn't look like anybody is wanting to fight Hrgovic for the money on offer even if winning guarantees a title shot.
This is your assumption.

cs: It is my assumption but it's an assumption bases on the IBF's record of taking no sh1t and imposing their rules on those who choose to be subject to them.

There is no evidence of other fighters, not named Hunter, having rejected decent payday offers to face Hrgovic.

cs: You're right, there is no evidence. To me that suggests either it has been handled discreetly and without publicity or it never happened. This might be because they are still deliberating their options or maybe they have decided to make Hrgovic mandatory by default.

A gentle reminder, AJ will not be obliged to perform a mandatory defence of his IBF title any sooner than 2023.

cs: You said that. All the more reason for the IBf not to be rushed into a decision.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56Unless I've misunderstood the situation it seems wrong to blame the one fighter who is willing to fight anyone nominated by the IBF for the money on offer.
I blame the Sauerlands (now operating as Wasserman). They won't fund decent fights.

cs: You know who you blame but what you have posted on several occasions has given me the impression that you blame the fighter and I think there are a whole host of heavyweights I'd be reproachful about before I got down to Hrgovic. His career as an amateur and WSB star demonstrate he is well accustomed to fighting the best in the world. He won't be fazed by any opponent and how many current top twenty heavyweights can you confidently say that about?
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56 Now you may want to blame Matchroom for failing to back Hrgovic financially, but Matchroom is Eddie Hearn whose main priority is Anthony Joshua.
Matchroom is partially responsible, though I'm led to believe Hearn's affiliation with Hrgovic has technically ended.

cs: I had thought that but it was you brought up Matchroom and I took it that I must have been wrong. I fully accept i am nowhere near to being as aware of such developments as your good self.

However, I feel that the Sauerland's are mainly responsible.

cs: I think they are to blame along with Filp's reputation for being someone you don't want to mess with unless you are going to be handsomely remuneratedi in a way that Sauerland/Wasserman seem unwilling or unable to match.

Anyway, back to your point... heavyweight fighters affiliated with the Matchroom stable have generally done well (i.e. Chisora, Whyte, Allen, Parker, Usyk, Price etc.).

cs: No arguments there but maybe Eddie wasn't so motivated to keep AJ away from those guys. I could be way off the mark with that, i know.
candyslim wrote: 10 Sep 2021, 11:56You have ask why Eddie Hearn would invest good money to secure a fight for a Croatian fighter which won't be a hit at the box-office, purely in order to get Hrgovic a shot at Joshua. If Eddie sees Hrgovic the same way I do, he's not going to spend big money to buy his man AJ a banana-skin to place at the top of his stairs is he?
It’s not as if Hrgovic’s handlers (the Sauerland's) are doing their upmost to build a loyal fanbase, because as well as constantly engaging in hideously obscene mismatches, Filip seems to fight in a different country every time he competes (i.e. Croatia, Latvia, Germany, USA, Denmark, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Austria etc.).

cs:Yes it doesn't seem like a sensible approach at all.

Established world-rated fighters aren’t going to take a significant pay cut to fight an anonymous unproven prospect that has no fan-base.

cs: Answered in my comment about eleven before this one.

For the record, Matchroom and Wasserman (formerly Sauerland) are now rivals, since they provide boxing content for rival networks (i.e. DAZN vs. Sky).

cs: Ok

I believe that Hearn is still buddies with the Sauerland's, but their network rivalry may make fights between both teams more challenging/complicated, which will very likely hinder Hrgovic's options/opportunities.

cs: Surety the opponent selection can't possibly go downhill :o
My comments above preceded cs:

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 07:11
by Enlightened-One
candyslim wrote: 11 Sep 2021, 06:01You know who you blame but what you have posted on several occasions has given me the impression that you blame the fighter...
The Sauerlands and to a lesser degree Eddie Hearn are responsible for Hrgovic’s plight.

However, the Croatian hype job needs to accept personal responsibility too.

He’s been with the Sauerlands for four years and he could have left them and signed with another promoter.

He could also refuse to engage in so many mismatches by rejecting bouts that most of us felt were wholly unacceptable.

By the way, did you see the fight?

Hrgovic has gained weight and looked a little fleshy around the midriff. He was also breathing excessively and there was very little head movement.

I honestly don’t know if he’s regressed or whether he was simply lackadaisical and out-of-shape, due him realising he was facing another abysmal opponent.

Hopefully it’ll be the latter, but I guess we won’t find out for sure until he eventually faces a decent opponent, which means we could be in for a very long wait.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 07:24
by Ruthless-RKO
He was around 224 pounds when he turned bro.

He’s what 240 now..

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 07:43
by adislav123
the 'fight' was absolute crap as we all knew it would be. atrocious matchmaking.

what you have to consider though is a whole nation saw hrgovic absolutely annihilate a serbian 20-0 unbeaten 'fighter" on national television at prime time for free.

average croatian household has about 10 tv channels.

ivdon't know the actual tv numbers but this might give you a hint why that shitshow was staged in the first place.

surely wasn't a fight for boxing 'insiders'.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 08:41
by peter barlow
adislav123 wrote: 11 Sep 2021, 07:43 the 'fight' was absolute crap as we all knew it would be. atrocious matchmaking.

what you have to consider though is a whole nation saw hrgovic absolutely annihilate a serbian 20-0 unbeaten 'fighter" on national television at prime time for free.

average croatian household has about 10 tv channels.

ivdon't know the actual tv numbers but this might give you a hint why that shitshow was staged in the first place.

surely wasn't a fight for boxing 'insiders'.
Makes sense in that respect, do you reckon the Alen Babic fight could happen anytime soon?

Not like there is promoter issues and at this point Babic is a step up for Hrgovic

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 09:07
by Enlightened-One
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 11 Sep 2021, 07:24 He was around 224 pounds when he turned bro.

He’s what 240 now..
He’s 24lbs heavier than his pro debut (currently 247lbs).

He definitely had some love handles against Radonjic.

He was also breathing quite heavily.

So I suspect he was a little out-of-shape. He’s looked better in previous outings.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 13:34
by Ruthless-RKO

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 14:16
by DrDuke
It looked quite embarrassing. Someone should interfere in Hrgovic's track.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 15:51
by goose 5
Stream was good, card was garbage.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 17:44
by candyslim
Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Sep 2021, 07:11
candyslim wrote: 11 Sep 2021, 06:01You know who you blame but what you have posted on several occasions has given me the impression that you blame the fighter...
The Sauerlands and to a lesser degree Eddie Hearn are responsible for Hrgovic’s plight.

cs: Agreed.

However, the Croatian hype job needs to accept personal responsibility too.

He’s been with the Sauerlands for four years and he could have left them and signed with another promoter.

cs: I guess that is true, although I'm not sure how other promoters see Filip Hrgovic. Superficially Hrgovic has the potential to become world champion - who wouldn't jump at the chance to guide him to that destiny? Then you stop and take stock of the practical considerations: He's a Croat which means he doesn't have a huge boxing loving population behind him willing to spend their disposable income following him to fights or watching him on PPV. He intimidates good fighters and the kind of fighter he needs to be fighting will demand a lot of money to face him or won't face him at all whatever the purse. Such fights will be popular with hardcore boxing fans but are unlikely to be highly profitable. In short his journey requires serious backing from a promoter with deep pockets that isn't doing it to get rich(er). How many multi-millionaire patriots who love boxing do they have in Croatia?

He could also refuse to engage in so many mismatches by rejecting bouts that most of us felt were wholly unacceptable.

cs: He could and maybe he should.

By the way, did you see the fight?

cs: Not yet but I plan to shortly. I'm not champing at the bit if I'm being completely honest. At least it doesn't last long.

Hrgovic has gained weight and looked a little fleshy around the midriff. He was also breathing excessively and there was very little head movement.

cs: He desperately needs opponents that can motivate him to make an effort. It may be difficult to get motivated to put the work in, knowing you'll be fighting someone you could beat with both your legs in plaster.

I honestly don’t know if he’s regressed or whether he was simply lackadaisical and out-of-shape, due him realising he was facing another abysmal opponent.

cs: Exactly. I feel for him even if he could do much more to help his situation.

Hopefully it’ll be the latter, but I guess we won’t find out for sure until he eventually faces a decent opponent, which means we could be in for a very long wait.

cs: I fear you may be right. Hopefully the key is the IBF. He is one side of a final eliminator for their mandatory. Either they will find an opponent willing to fight him for the modest purse on offer, or if that proves beyond their powers of persuasion they may just make him mandatory without having to contest it. As you pointed out the title fight won't be without a considerable wait but it gives him a goal to aim at and hopefullythe motivation to ensure he's in shape to give it his best shot.
At least with the IBF we know they won't stand for too much in the way of delaying by the defending champion, and Hrgovic won't get fukced around by a bunch of corrupt scumbags who will break all their own rules to protect their current belt-holder.
My comments above preceded cs:

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 20:40
by Enlightened-One
candyslim wrote: 11 Sep 2021, 17:44Hopefully the key is the IBF. He is one side of a final eliminator for their mandatory. Either they will find an opponent willing to fight him for the modest purse on offer, or if that proves beyond their powers of persuasion they may just make him mandatory without having to contest it. As you pointed out the title fight won't be without a considerable wait but it gives him a goal to aim at and hopefullythe motivation to ensure he's in shape to give it his best shot.
It’s a weird situation, because if the IBF grant Hrgovic mandatory challenger status without needing to emerge victorious in a final eliminator, then I suspect the Sauerlands will adopt the safest path until he eventually challenges for a world title sometime during 2023.

This leads me to believe that Hrgovic will continue engaging in more meaningless stay-busy mismatches to protect the massive payday that he and his promoters will eventually receive when they face the eventual victor of the Joshua-Fury-Wilder Round-robin tournament.

And if my suspicions are ultimately proven to be correct, then Hrgovic will be woefully underprepared for his world title opportunity. The Croatian will not only taste defeat, but he’ll lose very badly!

If I contemplate Hrgovic’s career by comparing the pros to the cons, I just can’t see any sporting benefit for a fighter continually facing outrageously abysmal opposition, especially when you take into consideration that Hrgovic just keeps needlessly gaining weight to the detriment of his athletic ability.

Filip Hrgovic is standing at the career crossroads.

He can either seek to improve his pugilistic ability, by changing promoters and engaging in risky fights against opposition that will challenge him… or he makes a business decision, maintains the status quo by continually engaging in mismatches whilst patiently waiting for his lucrative IBF world title shot.

Re: Filip Hrgovic vs. Marko Radonjic - September 10, 2021

Posted: 12 Sep 2021, 03:28
by candyslim
I doubt they will provide him with good and expensive opposition, so it won't be ideal preparation for his title shot. At least it should give him the necessary motivation to lose the timber and get himself into the best physical shape he can be.

He has a wealth of experience against world class amateur and WSB operators which won't be completely lost to him. His situation won't be worse than being two and a half years out the ring with only Seferi and a washed up Pianeta to prepare him.

Yes I know but I'm trying to put a positive spin on it.