Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 17 Feb 2022, 10:22
Very interested in main event, undercard is very poor though so can't justify buying. Have an IPTV so will hope it stays up for main event.
BoxRec
Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Page 3 of 4
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 15:14
Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 15:25
Both undefeated. Someone’s 0 has to got to go!!gregregegg wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 15:14 Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 15:26
Gunna come down to heart really. Who wants it more?maverick23 wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 15:25Both undefeated. Someone’s 0 has to got to go!!gregregegg wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 15:14 Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 15:36
It’s the Olympic hero vs the multi sport young upstart. Darnell is the striker/keeper for Armfield FC. There’s talk that if he wins this one then he’ll have his next fight at Armfield stadium.gregregegg wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 15:26Gunna come down to heart really. Who wants it more?maverick23 wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 15:25Both undefeated. Someone’s 0 has to got to go!!gregregegg wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 15:14 Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 16:25
Jonas vs Chamus has me salivating
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
And there’s the respect!
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 17:04
I'm fairly sure there will be a cacophony of noise too
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 17:28
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 18 Feb 2022, 18:45
Smith has spoken out strongly today over homosexual slurs in the Khan v Brook presserJamesPhilips wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 17:04I'm fairly sure there will be a cacophony of noise too
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 00:02
How the Fuk is natasha jonas fighting for a 154lb world title?
She has never beat a pulse, been in 2 world title fights and not won one and is arguably a 130lber... Yet now she gets a shot at the 154lb world championship vs someone thats weighted in at 147.25lb
She has never beat a pulse, been in 2 world title fights and not won one and is arguably a 130lber... Yet now she gets a shot at the 154lb world championship vs someone thats weighted in at 147.25lb
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 00:04
lol it's a joke even for a woman's title fight
chick moving up 3 divisions vs late replacement who hasnt won in 3 years and weighs 147. even for the 154 womens division im sure they couldve done better
adam smith will sure love it though, a battle for the ages! and jonas is a mom!
chick moving up 3 divisions vs late replacement who hasnt won in 3 years and weighs 147. even for the 154 womens division im sure they couldve done better
adam smith will sure love it though, a battle for the ages! and jonas is a mom!
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 04:07
Yep and it’s a PPV co-main.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 00:04 lol it's a joke even for a woman's title fight
chick moving up 3 divisions vs late replacement who hasnt won in 3 years and weighs 147. even for the 154 womens division im sure they couldve done better
adam smith will sure love it though, a battle for the ages! and jonas is a mom!
I don’t mind a well matched women’s fight but this one’s a bit of a joke on paper.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 05:38
Fans are dumb
They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv
And so it goes....
Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights
You get what you deserve in the end
I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv
And so it goes....
Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights
You get what you deserve in the end
I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 05:53
I didn’t buy Khan/Prescott as that was an awful main event for a PPV with an average undercard too.funso banjo baby wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 05:38 Fans are dumb
They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv
And so it goes....
Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights
You get what you deserve in the end
I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
I bought both Haye/Bellew PPVs as I was a fan of both and the undercards, particularly the rematch from memory, were decent.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:12
That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:16
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:17
They have hyped the main event extremely well and people are up for it.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
The undercard is awful though which the majority have pointed out. In reality it won’t stop many people buying it though.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:21
They should have been looking to match him to how Joyce was matched early doors. He fought Lewiston on debut who was no great shakes but was area level and had just fought for the British.mickey1975 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:16He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
If Darnell is as bad as he looked at the weigh in then it’ll do no one any favours.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:28
The Clarke fight isn't as bad as it looks on paper but it'll still be over quick, or should be. Jake is a tough lad. He's fought Mark Potter amongst other people and has been on the unlicensed circuit for years. He's certainly more experienced than a lot of debutant's opponents. He'll try and make an impression but to no avail.mickey1975 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:16He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:28
Fans are fans though! Each to their own. I won't pay for it but obviously someone is if they keep doing it!!!funso banjo baby wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 05:38 Fans are dumb
They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv
And so it goes....
Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights
You get what you deserve in the end
I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:36
It’s not good mate. A 44 year old Potter hammered him and stopped him with body shots. That was probably a fight that Jake had notice for too.589555 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:28The Clarke fight isn't as bad as it looks on paper but it'll still be over quick, or should be. Jake is a tough lad. He's fought Mark Potter amongst other people and has been on the unlicensed circuit for years. He's certainly more experienced than a lot of debutant's opponents. He'll try and make an impression but to no avail.mickey1975 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:16He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.Twinkle Toes wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.
Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.
People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:42
I agree it's certainly not good! My point it he's not a rank first timer, It could be worse and it shouldn't be live on PPV. Highlights of the stoppage maybe.maverick23 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:36It’s not good mate. A 44 year old Potter hammered him and stopped him with body shots. That was probably a fight that Jake had notice for too.589555 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:28The Clarke fight isn't as bad as it looks on paper but it'll still be over quick, or should be. Jake is a tough lad. He's fought Mark Potter amongst other people and has been on the unlicensed circuit for years. He's certainly more experienced than a lot of debutant's opponents. He'll try and make an impression but to no avail.mickey1975 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:16
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:45
clarke should be debuting vs someone like mark bennet at least.................guy is 30, had a sh!tload of am experience, and in the wsb already beat guys like vladislav sirenko (stoppage), vianello, etc
Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard
Posted: 19 Feb 2022, 06:56
Yep. Turning pro at 30 every fight needs to count.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 06:45 clarke should be debuting vs someone like mark bennet at least.................guy is 30, had a sh!tload of am experience, and in the wsb already beat guys like vladislav sirenko (stoppage), vianello, etc