BoxRec

caldo2025 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 12:07

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 08:52

caldo2025 wrote: ↑18 Mar 2022, 20:45

Pretty dopey posts man. Don’t you understand what fighters go through after getting knocked out? Wilder was having serious issues upstairs after the first Fury TKO. This time, he got cleanly knocked the hell out. There’s a lot that goes into getting that fighter in a healthier mindset enough to get back in the gym never mind another super fight like this would be against AJ. Lastly, after considering all of the stuff above, Wilder is now a very rich man already. He could retire comfortably right now for life without working another minute in his whole life. His children are covered for life. His grand children are set. It’s not like offering, let’s say, you this sum of money. Of course we’d take the money. It’s different when the money isn’t so much of what tells the story when it comes to matchmaking.

None of his fights made big money. Don't forget haymon and finkel took their cuts so did Uncle Sam.

His net worth is between 30-40m dude. He didn’t make that jank fighting all of the other taxi drivers on his resume. Wilder is living well from here on out whether he fights again or not.

Bandog wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 12:59 Is Joyce fighting Joshua now or will it still be Usyk does anyone know?

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 17:34 Caldo, you’re talking to a dude who says GGG threw the Canelo fights. As in, he went easy deliberately. He’s a fkin nut, just so you’re warned

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 21:16

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 17:34 Caldo, you’re talking to a dude who says GGG threw the Canelo fights. As in, he went easy deliberately. He’s a fkin nut, just so you’re warned

I'm not saying it as fact but for my eyes and senses it looked like GGG played soft for Canelo for the monster paydays. And all the evidence and elements suggest Canelo and Oscar used their draw power as leverage to squeeze GGG to agree to ALL their terms. If you think Canelo and Oscar would not do that you're a sanctimonious dope.

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑22 Mar 2022, 06:08

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 21:16

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 17:34 Caldo, you’re talking to a dude who says GGG threw the Canelo fights. As in, he went easy deliberately. He’s a fkin nut, just so you’re warned

I'm not saying it as fact but for my eyes and senses it looked like GGG played soft for Canelo for the monster paydays. And all the evidence and elements suggest Canelo and Oscar used their draw power as leverage to squeeze GGG to agree to ALL their terms. If you think Canelo and Oscar would not do that you're a sanctimonious dope.

but if you believe GGG actually did it, then you think he is a conman (conning fans who bet on him thinking that the fight and he were on the level) and a weakling (for letting Canelo and Oscar dupe him like that) and a fraud (claims to be a real fighter, isn't) and a dupe and an idiot (he didn't even get the third fight that you say he threw two other fights, just to get that third fight, so he threw two fights for nothing, according to you)

so it's either (1) I am a sanctimonious dope and
(2) GGG is a fraud, weakling, idiot, dupe, and a fake-ass non-fighter who doesn't believe in giving a full effort in the ring and prostituted his ability for money and still got conned




ORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

(3) you're a fvcking imbecile


yeah, I'm good with (3), thanks, and so is pretty much everyone else around here I'd imagine

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 21:16

If you think Canelo and Oscar would not do that you're a sanctimonious dope. Oscar revealed in the lawsuit with Canelo's old promoter that he projected Canelo and himself to earn $400M each over the next ten years. So they had the wealth to buy off and squeeze GGG.

Wales wrote: ↑24 Mar 2022, 00:26

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 21:16

If you think Canelo and Oscar would not do that you're a sanctimonious dope. Oscar revealed in the lawsuit with Canelo's old promoter that he projected Canelo and himself to earn $400M each over the next ten years. So they had the wealth to buy off and squeeze GGG.

So GGG was paid and squeezed to lose the fight? Surely if that’s the case he’d take a dive and not win the fight in most peoples eyes

one judge, Adelaide Byrd, scored the fight 118-110 to Canelo yet you think GGG is the one that’s been paid off and thrown the right?

There is corruption in boxing - but Oscar couldn’t pay off and squeeze a prostitute that had photos of him in fish net rights and high heels; the. He couldn’t pay off and squeeze a hooker that released a story about him having sex with her and putting a kitchen utensil up his arse.

So believe me he isn’t going to pay off and squeeze GGG and K2 into losing

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 21:16

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 17:34 Caldo, you’re talking to a dude who says GGG threw the Canelo fights. As in, he went easy deliberately. He’s a fkin nut, just so you’re warned

I'm not saying it as fact but for my eyes and senses it looked like GGG played soft for Canelo for the monster paydays. And all the evidence and elements suggest Canelo and Oscar used their draw power as leverage to squeeze GGG to agree to ALL their terms. If you think Canelo and Oscar would not do that you're a sanctimonious dope. Oscar revealed in the lawsuit with Canelo's old promoter that he projected Canelo and himself to earn $400M each over the next ten years. So they had the wealth to buy off and squeeze GGG. Losing to GGG would have cut that $400M each way way way way down.

You disappoint me with your ignorant sanctimonius stupidity and refusal to grasp reality.

Mayweather and Haymon did the same thing for over a decade. If you want the biggest payday of your career you have to play soft with me or take the dive. Anyone who refused was ducked. That's why every one of Floyd's fake fights looked like the same damned boring soft sparring session. Floyd got forced by Les Moonves to fight Pac and they rigged the judges, just get to the final bell and take no risks and the judges would give the decision to Phloyd.

caldo2025 wrote: ↑25 Mar 2022, 14:19

bjornborgbook wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 21:16

Counter-puncher wrote: ↑19 Mar 2022, 17:34 Caldo, you’re talking to a dude who says GGG threw the Canelo fights. As in, he went easy deliberately. He’s a fkin nut, just so you’re warned

I'm not saying it as fact but for my eyes and senses it looked like GGG played soft for Canelo for the monster paydays. And all the evidence and elements suggest Canelo and Oscar used their draw power as leverage to squeeze GGG to agree to ALL their terms. If you think Canelo and Oscar would not do that you're a sanctimonious dope. Oscar revealed in the lawsuit with Canelo's old promoter that he projected Canelo and himself to earn $400M each over the next ten years. So they had the wealth to buy off and squeeze GGG. Losing to GGG would have cut that $400M each way way way way down.

You disappoint me with your ignorant sanctimonius stupidity and refusal to grasp reality.

Mayweather and Haymon did the same thing for over a decade. If you want the biggest payday of your career you have to play soft with me or take the dive. Anyone who refused was ducked. That's why every one of Floyd's fake fights looked like the same damned boring soft sparring session. Floyd got forced by Les Moonves to fight Pac and they rigged the judges, just get to the final bell and take no risks and the judges would give the decision to Phloyd.

Buddy, no one is good enough to step inside the ring at this level and “play soft” in order to somehow create more money in the future. That’s just not possible. Now, if you claim that GGG took a bribe to lose the 2nd fight by decision then I think it would be a better stance but even that’s a ridiculous claim.

Look, Boxing is and has always been crooked as hell. I’m sure that we all would be surprised by the garbage sling behind the scenes of these huge fights. But there’s way too much danger inside those ropes for any boxer to go in and play around in the ways you’ve suggested. Not possible.

Bandog wrote: ↑25 Mar 2022, 19:45 If we passed the hat, would you take the money and run bjornborgbook? Stick to tennis.

oogiebe wrote: ↑25 Mar 2022, 23:29

Bandog wrote: ↑25 Mar 2022, 19:45 If we passed the hat, would you take the money and run bjornborgbook? Stick to tennis.

put me in for a twenty!