Page 3 of 3
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 27 Apr 2022, 11:53
by punchy1
Yes, the answer is how ???
The fee is small enough for small claims court.... However, say you are in Mexico, how the heck you going to sue someone who is based in England ?
The mechanism is not there, never mind the language barrier...
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 27 Apr 2022, 22:23
by RScarf1
punchy1 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2022, 11:53
Yes, the answer is how ???
The fee is small enough for small claims court.... However, say you are in Mexico, how the heck you going to sue someone who is based in England ?
The mechanism is not there, never mind the language barrier...
I assume there will be a resolution with the lawsuit. I didn't read the whole thing, but I thought that the main issue was BoxRec not recognizing certain boxing commissions.
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 07:36
by marcel laguna
Why aren’t bouts at the World Series of Boxing recorded in Boxrec?
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 09:28
by punchy1
No idea. Ask John Shep I guess. Should be !
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 11:51
by margaret thatcher
as said earlier in this thread, they are listed in the amateur section of guys records
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 12:45
by punchy1
are they amateurs ??
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 12:47
by margaret thatcher
kind of an in between area, not conventional pro boxing but not traditional am boxing
amateur boxers have been getting paid to box for years, that's nothing new. the most recent amateur world championships had loads of money paid out too
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 28 Apr 2022, 13:15
by gilgamesh
I read the charges in the lawsuit. Doesn't look like this guy has much of a case.
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 05 May 2022, 23:10
by punchy1
Let's pose a question that is a real possibility.
If a fighter was hurt boxing pro for a commission that is duly recognized by that country's Federal Government, and the commission in question has had bouts counted in Boxrec as well as Fight Fax in the past, and currently has FIght Fax counting their bouts, and a boxer gets knocked out unconscious....
But boxrec is notified of the bout and result, But refuses to list it,
And the injured fighter, because as far as the commissions know, hasn't fought and hasn't gotten hurt, engages in another bout in another location for a different but also duly recognized commission
And gets seriously hurt or killed .....
Where does the liability lie ?
It certainly is the job of the commissions to enforce commission rules, such as not having more than 2 fights usually within 7 days, and not allowing a boxer who was knocked out/ tko'ed to fight until after a 60 or 90 day suspension and / or brain scan/ exam....
But if the "Official record keeper (BOXREC) the commission relies on, does not do their job, knowing full well such a bout happened, but refuses to report it, and thus the loss and injury...... is boxrec liable for the boxer's injury from claiming to be an "Official record keeper" , having knowledge of such a fight, but willfully refusing to report / record it ?
Please let me know your opinion ...
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 04:15
by Fightnight Scores
What about the boxer himself, or his handler? If they choose to go and fight again so soon after a loss knowing the dangers and the general concencus/rules. Are they not liable to themselves?
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 14:32
by tiny_acres
punchy1 wrote: ↑05 May 2022, 23:10
Let's pose a question that is a real possibility.
If a fighter was hurt boxing pro for a commission that is duly recognized by that country's Federal Government, and the commission in question has had bouts counted in Boxrec as well as Fight Fax in the past, and currently has FIght Fax counting their bouts, and a boxer gets knocked out unconscious....
But boxrec is notified of the bout and result, But refuses to list it,
And the injured fighter, because as far as the commissions know, hasn't fought and hasn't gotten hurt, engages in another bout in another location for a different but also duly recognized commission
And gets seriously hurt or killed .....
Where does the liability lie ?
It certainly is the job of the commissions to enforce commission rules, such as not having more than 2 fights usually within 7 days, and not allowing a boxer who was knocked out/ tko'ed to fight until after a 60 or 90 day suspension and / or brain scan/ exam....
But if the "Official record keeper (BOXREC) the commission relies on, does not do their job, knowing full well such a bout happened, but refuses to report it, and thus the loss and injury...... is boxrec liable for the boxer's injury from claiming to be an "Official record keeper" , having knowledge of such a fight, but willfully refusing to report / record it ?
Please let me know your opinion ...
Fight fax now called pro boxing records is the official record keeping organization of the WBC wbo and IBf and the association of boxing commissions
When did boxrec become the official record keeper?
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 18:37
by Bandog
tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 May 2022, 14:32
punchy1 wrote: ↑05 May 2022, 23:10
Let's pose a question that is a real possibility.
If a fighter was hurt boxing pro for a commission that is duly recognized by that country's Federal Government, and the commission in question has had bouts counted in Boxrec as well as Fight Fax in the past, and currently has FIght Fax counting their bouts, and a boxer gets knocked out unconscious....
But boxrec is notified of the bout and result, But refuses to list it,
And the injured fighter, because as far as the commissions know, hasn't fought and hasn't gotten hurt, engages in another bout in another location for a different but also duly recognized commission
And gets seriously hurt or killed .....
Where does the liability lie ?
It certainly is the job of the commissions to enforce commission rules, such as not having more than 2 fights usually within 7 days, and not allowing a boxer who was knocked out/ tko'ed to fight until after a 60 or 90 day suspension and / or brain scan/ exam....
But if the "Official record keeper (BOXREC) the commission relies on, does not do their job, knowing full well such a bout happened, but refuses to report it, and thus the loss and injury...... is boxrec liable for the boxer's injury from claiming to be an "Official record keeper" , having knowledge of such a fight, but willfully refusing to report / record it ?
Please let me know your opinion ...
Fight fax now called pro boxing records is the official record keeping organization of the WBC wbo and IBf and the association of boxing commissions
When did boxrec become the official record keeper?
You can basically sue anyone for anything today it seems. Smh
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 20:08
by tiny_acres
Bandog wrote: ↑06 May 2022, 18:37
tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 May 2022, 14:32
punchy1 wrote: ↑05 May 2022, 23:10
Let's pose a question that is a real possibility.
If a fighter was hurt boxing pro for a commission that is duly recognized by that country's Federal Government, and the commission in question has had bouts counted in Boxrec as well as Fight Fax in the past, and currently has FIght Fax counting their bouts, and a boxer gets knocked out unconscious....
But boxrec is notified of the bout and result, But refuses to list it,
And the injured fighter, because as far as the commissions know, hasn't fought and hasn't gotten hurt, engages in another bout in another location for a different but also duly recognized commission
And gets seriously hurt or killed .....
Where does the liability lie ?
It certainly is the job of the commissions to enforce commission rules, such as not having more than 2 fights usually within 7 days, and not allowing a boxer who was knocked out/ tko'ed to fight until after a 60 or 90 day suspension and / or brain scan/ exam....
But if the "Official record keeper (BOXREC) the commission relies on, does not do their job, knowing full well such a bout happened, but refuses to report it, and thus the loss and injury...... is boxrec liable for the boxer's injury from claiming to be an "Official record keeper" , having knowledge of such a fight, but willfully refusing to report / record it ?
Please let me know your opinion ...
Fight fax now called pro boxing records is the official record keeping organization of the WBC wbo and IBf and the association of boxing commissions
When did boxrec become the official record keeper?
You can basically sue anyone for anything today it seems. Smh
Pathetic ain't it?
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 20:36
by punchy1
it's civics 101 time.
Boxing commissions exits to prevent just the sort of abuse that boxrec's negligence can cause with regards to injured boxers fighting.
Why have rules such as no boxer can fight if they are medically suspended,/ unfit/ within 1 week of a past bout, if you are not held accountable for enforcing them, and the onus is on the injured boxer to assume all risk for his/ her actions ??
Sound good in practice, but let me ask you who pays if that boxer who should not have been boxing gets hurt/ dies/ etc ?
The promoter, and more accurately, the insurance company that ensures the bout. If all due diligence and laws have been followed.. otherwise the insurance company will try like hell to shift responsibility onto anything and anyone else.. the commission who cleared the fight. They in turn, will do an investigation, and if that boxer should have been on medical suspension for a bout that should have been recorded as such, but willfully wasn't, then guess what ?
Basically, whoever didn't do their job /didn't fulfill their stated responsibilities, ie.. record official bouts, such as boxrec, will face liability exposure.
The injured boxer/ the family of the dead/ injured boxer who should have faced a medical suspension and not be allowed to fight, can and will say "no one stopped me from fighting"
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 21:33
by tiny_acres
punchy1 wrote: ↑06 May 2022, 20:36
it's civics 101 time.
Boxing commissions exits to prevent just the sort of abuse that boxrec's negligence can cause with regards to injured boxers fighting.
Why have rules such as no boxer can fight if they are medically suspended,/ unfit/ within 1 week of a past bout, if you are not held accountable for enforcing them, and the onus is on the injured boxer to assume all risk for his/ her actions ??
Sound good in practice, but let me ask you who pays if that boxer who should not have been boxing gets hurt/ dies/ etc ?
The promoter, and more accurately, the insurance company that ensures the bout. If all due diligence and laws have been followed.. otherwise the insurance company will try like hell to shift responsibility onto anything and anyone else.. the commission who cleared the fight. They in turn, will do an investigation, and if that boxer should have been on medical suspension for a bout that should have been recorded as such, but willfully wasn't, then guess what ?
Basically, whoever didn't do their job /didn't fulfill their stated responsibilities, ie.. record official bouts, such as boxrec, will face liability exposure.
The injured boxer/ the family of the dead/ injured boxer who should have faced a medical suspension and not be allowed to fight, can and will say "no one stopped me from fighting"
If the site formerly known as fight fax is the official record keeping of the association of boxing commissions
Do you honestly believe that a boxing commission should count on a website that has openly stated that they do not list all fights?
Don't you think that a promotion should take that simple step to insure the safety of their fighters?
Or do you believe that a free site should be held liable for a cheap promoter?
Promoters not wanting to pay to get accurate records are to blame. Not a site that offers free info
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 22:19
by punchy1
" In 2005, BoxRec applied to become recognized as the official record keepers for the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC).[3] The ABC held interviews with both Fight Fax and BoxRec at their 2005 convention. Each applicant made a submission and presentation to the ABC panel which included state commissioners and attorneys. The panel then voted unanimously in favour to award Fight Fax the position. The ABC later revealed that they had undertaken tests to measure the accuracy of the records of the websites and the Fight Fax records were shown to be 100% accurate with BoxRec's was found "to be substantially lower".[3] In 2016, the ABC voted to recognize Boxrec as an official record keeper alongside Fight Fax.[4]"
from wikipedia's entry on boxrec.....
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 06 May 2022, 22:50
by punchy1
apparently boxrec is the official record keeper as per the ABC.....
so "official" bears a certain responsibility
ps- it is not entirely free either..... it costs to list bouts, to list fighters on a card, to list promoters, matchmakers and as a manager....
Re: Boxrec getting sued in federal court
Posted: 07 May 2022, 11:44
by Bandog
The FTC has bigger fish to fry I'm guessing with huge corporations breaking anti trust laws. Boxrec will most likely get a warning letter.