Page 3 of 3
Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 03 May 2022, 17:01
by KiwiRider
maverick23 wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 16:35
KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 15:54
Dioufy wrote: ↑02 May 2022, 07:47
Knowing Warren it probably made a 15 quid loss the entire show and he will attempt to sue Whyte for £2m damages because of it.

Classic Fwank.
Seriously, if it made a profit or not, there will be some sort of legal action- either instigated by Fwank, or brought on him.
I think Frank said he’d already paid Whyte. After Whyte not playing ball initially I was expecting some withholding of the purse.
Yes, read that he had

I'm just saying, an event this big, isn't there always a furious Fwank on the dog n bone to his lawyers?
Maybe not for purses, but something or other?
Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 03 May 2022, 17:06
by Coco
KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 17:01
maverick23 wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 16:35
KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 15:54

Classic Fwank.
Seriously, if it made a profit or not, there will be some sort of legal action- either instigated by Fwank, or brought on him.
I think Frank said he’d already paid Whyte. After Whyte not playing ball initially I was expecting some withholding of the purse.
Yes, read that he had

I'm just saying, an event this big, isn't there always a furious Fwank on the dog n bone to his lawyers?
Maybe not for purses, but something or other?
FW was relaxed and content, smells like a commercial success to me
Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 03 May 2022, 17:15
by KiwiRider
Coco wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 17:06
KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 17:01
maverick23 wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 16:35
I think Frank said he’d already paid Whyte. After Whyte not playing ball initially I was expecting some withholding of the purse.
Yes, read that he had

I'm just saying, an event this big, isn't there always a furious Fwank on the dog n bone to his lawyers?
Maybe not for purses, but something or other?
FW was relaxed and content, smells like a commercial success to me
That is cool if it's the case.
He was a bit testie leading up to it, which was understandable.
Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 03 May 2022, 17:20
by Cyclops
Wasteman

Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 03 May 2022, 19:13
by quickeyg
Not this again
Look, Frank & Bob will be collecting tv broadcasting fees from another 68 countries.
Will take 3/4 weeks (Just relax)
If Bob (Arum) & Frank (Warren) wanna take the pi£$s I suggest they get Fury vs Ngannou signed with 100k at Wembley. Earn won't like that.
Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 04 May 2022, 03:03
by maverick23
Coco wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 17:06
KiwiRider wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 17:01
maverick23 wrote: ↑03 May 2022, 16:35
I think Frank said he’d already paid Whyte. After Whyte not playing ball initially I was expecting some withholding of the purse.
Yes, read that he had

I'm just saying, an event this big, isn't there always a furious Fwank on the dog n bone to his lawyers?
Maybe not for purses, but something or other?
FW was relaxed and content, smells like a commercial success to me
I actually thought the opposite. He was vague in his answers which I didn’t think was a good sign. He was talking about 1.5m buys in the build up - if the signs were that it had done over 1m then I think he’d be shouting about it as he was when they sold the 94,000 tickets.
1m buys would have likely been a PPV record for BT so I would have thought Frank would have wanted to get that out there too.
I hope it did close to what they were hoping purely because I think Tyson fully deserves his $34m or whatever it is.
Re: The 94k Wembley show profit?
Posted: 09 May 2022, 09:57
by funso banjo baby
One decent fight on the undercard but a truly awful main event
I will not ppv again unless the bill is studded with heavyweight action like the reasonable wilder v fury 3 card