She got a massive push from the beginning. That was under Sky Matchroom.
Now DAZN Matchroom is outside the casual world.
She got a massive push from the beginning. That was under Sky Matchroom.
Well no, it actually isn't.
What are they basing it on then..
You'd have to ask them. For what it is worth I don't agree with their statement, but I am just pointing out that saying someone or something is marketable does not necessarily imply that its potential of being marketed has actually been reached. As Taylor has been around a long time now though, you would think it really ought to have been if the potential is there.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Oct 2022, 07:07What are they basing it on then..
I understand..gp. wrote: ↑20 Oct 2022, 07:16You'd have to ask them. For what it is worth I don't agree with their statement, but I am just pointing out that saying someone or something is marketable does not necessarily imply that its potential of being marketed has actually been reached. As Taylor has been around a long time now though, you would think it really ought to have been if the potential is there.
She is marketable as she’s arguably the number 1 in womens boxing, massively helped the amateur game for women and professional boxing in the U.K. for women (after winning pretty much everything), doesn’t talk trash and comes across well and likeable. In a world that’s wanting to push that women can do anything relating to sport, she has attributes that companies would be keen to be associated with.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Oct 2022, 07:25I understand..gp. wrote: ↑20 Oct 2022, 07:16You'd have to ask them. For what it is worth I don't agree with their statement, but I am just pointing out that saying someone or something is marketable does not necessarily imply that its potential of being marketed has actually been reached. As Taylor has been around a long time now though, you would think it really ought to have been if the potential is there.
i just don't understand..
What made them assume that she is marketable.
Strange times..
Katie earned everything through her fists and talent, she was already past her prime before most of you got to see her, she was the best female boxer in the world for years, forever, and the competition was good in women's amateur boxingCaptainSpacerod wrote: ↑26 Oct 2022, 20:51 Have Alex Steedman and the boxing news podcast been paid a visit by the woke police ?
He’s still banging on about how great last week’s all female card was. The Shields fight was a good fight, but it was nowhere near great, certainly not one of the year’s best fights as the previously excellent but now utterly brainwashed Barry Jones told us. The Mayer v Baum fight wasn’t very good at all.
My point in choosing this thread to post in was to highlight Alex’s absurd comment “You know you’ve made it when you’re called by just one name - Katie, Ali, Loma”.To mention Katie in the same breath as Ali is insane. Even with Loma, he may not have crossed over into mainstream celebrity, few boxers do, but amongst boxing fans worldwide his name carries much more weight than the fairly anonymous Katie.
Is there nowhere we can go to escape this nonsense anymore![]()
Not true. Corporations all jump on every band wagon they can.GreenLightning wrote: ↑18 Nov 2022, 20:16 And guys, there's no such thing as a "woke" business, just a capitalist one
You just said it mate, "good to investors" or sportswashing etc ,it's not about social justice for the oppressed, it's about marketing to a wide demographic to get their moneyhigh tower 1 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 05:12Not true. Corporations all jump on every band wagon they can.GreenLightning wrote: ↑18 Nov 2022, 20:16 And guys, there's no such thing as a "woke" business, just a capitalist one
Most corporations now have departments solely focused on woke shite. They think it makes them look good to investors and maybe wash away whatever crap they’ve been up to.
"Most corporations now have departments solely focused on woke shite. "high tower 1 wrote: ↑19 Nov 2022, 05:12Not true. Corporations all jump on every band wagon they can.GreenLightning wrote: ↑18 Nov 2022, 20:16 And guys, there's no such thing as a "woke" business, just a capitalist one
Most corporations now have departments solely focused on woke shite. They think it makes them look good to investors and maybe wash away whatever crap they’ve been up to.
Go on LinkedIn and almost every company logo is draped in rainbow flags almost 6 months out of the year.
I’m boxing the only person not playing ball is allegedly. He sees through the tripe that it is.
You been reading the comments?
Yes, I didn't say everyone was a sexist.
keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑30 Nov 2022, 09:57 I'm an equalist and there isn't a drop of racism, sexism or homophobia in me. Live and let live. Anything that involves consenting adults is good with me. But I do think that the new wave of ostracizing anyone who discriminates in these areas is wrong.
Because of their upbringing, religion, culture or personal beliefs, some people are going to be racist, sexist and/or homophobic. As long as they're not hurting anyone, I think there is a place in the world for them.
That's my ten pence anyway.