Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Joson
Super Flyweight
Posts: 648
Joined: 04 Feb 2023, 14:33

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Joson »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 24 Oct 2023, 14:31
Joson wrote: 24 Oct 2023, 10:06
Ambling Alp II wrote: 24 Oct 2023, 09:39

Usyk should have been able to beat Joshua easier than he did. Yes AJ embarrassing loss to Ruiz hurts his case. Why wouldn't it? That and that his biggest wins are against opponents are senior citizens don't exactly help his cause. Joshua has done virtually nothing worth mentioning in his career.

Where is the evidence that Quarry was faded? He was only 29. He was ranked right behind Norton. He did hurt Quarry and btw, cuts do count.
Norton stopped Henry Clark who had a pretty good chin. He also hurt Holmes who obviously had a great chin.
Compare Norton's fights against Holmes, Quarry, Ali, and Young against Usyk's 5 hw fights. In comparison, Usyk's competition has been a joke so far.
It's well known that Quarry was on the athletic downside when he fought Norton. Jerry weighed a career-high 208 lbs for that bout, significantly heavier than in most prior fights. He took the fight on short notice, and didn't have a proper training camp.



Jerry took a terrible beating eight months earlier, against Joe Frazier, an experience that probably drained him of motivation. In his only other fight before Norton, in January 1975, Quarry looked sluggish in a tune-up against Scrap Iron Johnson.

Quarry was only 29, true. But he had been fighting pro for ten years, had been in lots of wars against top heavyweights, and was showing symptoms of burn-out.

Insiders claim that, after the June 1974 Frazier loss, Jerry did a lot of partying. He probably let himself go. They say he was drinking and playing golf the day that MSG called and offered him Norton on short notice.

As for Quarry's rating in March 1975, when he fought Norton, I recall that he was widely regarded as the seventh or eighth ranked contender. Going into that fight most magazines' ratings looked like this:

Champion: Muhammad Ali
1. George Foreman
2. Joe Frazier
3. Ken Norton
4. through 7. - Ron Lyle, Jimmy Young, Joe Bugner, or Oscar Bonavena (varied according to magazine)
8. Jerry Quarry
9. and 10. - Chuck Wepner, Howard Smith, Bob Stallings, Earnie Shavers, Henry Clark (varied according to magazine)

The Frazier loss knocked Quarry from the third or fourth position all the way down toward the bottom of the ratings. That's probably because of the decisive, one-sided nature of the defeat.
Quarry was still #7 at the end of 1974 by Ring Magazine. This was after the Frazier fight. They had Norton #6. That's pretty good when you look at the quality of hws at that time. The division was loaded at the time. May never have been stronger.

The old line about Quarry not being ready for Norton doesn't make any sense. He just had a fight a month before he fought Norton. He signed for the Norton fight three weeks before the fight. It simply doesn't make sense that Quarry could have got hopelessly out of shape in the 1-week interval between his last fight and signing to fight Norton.

Let's stop pretending that this wasn't a big fight. Big win for Norton. Even bigger than stopping legends like Daniel Dubois and Chazz Witherspoon.
I'm thinking Quarry may have let his conditioning slack off after the 1974 Frazier defeat. He was probably in less-than-perfect shape for the January tune-up against Johnson and against Norton a month later.

Don't you think Quarry looked too puffed up in the Norton bout? He's 208 lbs.

Either way, I do agree that as of 1975, Quarry was still a top ten contender. Stopping Quarry may have been Norton's finest achievement outside of defeating Ali in 1973.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by oogiebe »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 24 Oct 2023, 14:33
gilgamesh wrote: 24 Oct 2023, 14:30 Out of curiosity what does everyone consider to be Norton's peak?

I'd say it was around the time of the 3rd Ali fight in 1975.
Their third fight was actually in 1976. He had several great performances from 1973-1978. Take your pick.
Agree with Gil. The 3rd Ali fight was the best I saw of Kenny.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15101
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Really? Thought he looked better in the first two Ali fights, and against Quarry, Holmes, and Young. The Norton-Young fight might be underrated hw fight of all time.
Cojimar 1946
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1681
Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Cojimar 1946 »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 19 Oct 2023, 10:46 My biggest problem with Usyk is that he untested. We are going off of 5 fights. He is supposed to have a power advantage, based on what? 2 stoppages against no-names.
The guy fights literally once a year. The last was against a complete no hoper.

He would come on strong in the last third of the fight? Based on barely beating Anthony Joshua? Joshua is nowhere near the level of Ken Norton.

On the other hand, Norton is well tested. He certainly fought guys that could move -Ali, Young, Holmes, and did pretty well.

In real life we have all seen this kind of thing play out countless times. Undefeated untested guy against a proven guy. Proven guy wins 9 out 10 times.
Perfectly reasonable to use his cruiserweight bouts as Norton at 210 is approximately the size of his cruiserweight opponents.
So that gives us roughly 5 quality opponents for comparison (6 if you want to count Huck). Norton only really has 4 quality wins in Ali, Young, Quarry, and Cobb. So how is he more proven?
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15101
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Ambling Alp II »

:roll:
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16993
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Seamus »

Ali would have swept the series with Norton 3-0 if he spent more rds on his toes circling and boxing, whenever he did that he dominated. When he was stationary Norton dominated.
Cojimar 1946
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1681
Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Cojimar 1946 »

Usyks top 4 wins are probably Breidis, Joshua, Gassiev, and Hunter. I think that group could easily prevail over Ali, Young, Quarry, and Cobb. Ali should be favored over Breidis but every one of the other fights seems winnable for Usyks opponents. How is Norton far more proven in terms of quality wins?
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15101
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Ambling Alp II »

No, that group, doesn't prevail over the best guys Norton beat. Absurd to think so. Norton also had a great performance in a close loss to Holmes.
Last edited by Ambling Alp II on 18 Jan 2025, 23:46, edited 1 time in total.
Cojimar 1946
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1681
Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Cojimar 1946 »

Young vs Joshua could maybe go either way but realistically we would have to probably have to favor Gassiev and Hunter over Quarry and Cobb especially given Quarry was past his prime and out of shape vs Norton. The closest thing to Joshua that Young faced is probably Cooney, a devastating puncher with height and reach but questionable chin and stamina.

I don't know where this notion of Norton having a deep resume comes from. He didn't face Frazier, Lyle, Bonavena, Bugner, Ellis, Coetzee, etc, etc.
Joson
Super Flyweight
Posts: 648
Joined: 04 Feb 2023, 14:33

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Joson »

Cojimar 1946 wrote: 26 Oct 2023, 21:52 Usyks top 4 wins are probably Breidis, Joshua, Gassiev, and Hunter. I think that group could easily prevail over Ali, Young, Quarry, and Cobb. Ali should be favored over Breidis but every one of the other fights seems winnable for Usyks opponents. How is Norton far more proven in terms of quality wins?
Not sure I agree. In terms of ability - meaning who beats who - I'd rank them this way:

1st - Ali
2nd - Joshua
3rd thru 6th - Young, Quarry, Breidis, and Gassiev (in no particular order)
7th - Hunter
8th - Cobb
Joson
Super Flyweight
Posts: 648
Joined: 04 Feb 2023, 14:33

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by Joson »

Cojimar 1946 wrote: 27 Oct 2023, 19:46 Young vs Joshua could maybe go either way but realistically we would have to probably have to favor Gassiev and Hunter over Quarry and Cobb especially given Quarry was past his prime and out of shape vs Norton. The closest thing to Joshua that Young faced is probably Cooney, a devastating puncher with height and reach but questionable chin and stamina.

I don't know where this notion of Norton having a deep resume comes from. He didn't face Frazier, Lyle, Bonavena, Bugner, Ellis, Coetzee, etc, etc.
Norton's victory over Ali gives him a deep resume, in that Ali is universally regarded as candidate for ATG heavyweight champ. And in the opinion of many, Norton may have beaten Ali in all three of their fights.

Ken's win over Young is also a major accomplishment. The 1977 version of Young would have been a world-rated contender in any era. The same could be said of the 1975 Quarry, even though Jerry was on the downside when Ken KO'd him.

Regarding the others - Frazier, Lyle, Bonavena, Bugner, Ellis, and Coetzee - Norton was inferior to Frazier but not the rest. Some pundits argue that he might have lost to Lyle, although that's debatable. Beating Bonavena, Bugner, et al wouldn't have added to Ken's resume.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Ken Norton vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Post by DrDuke »

Norton had an extremely diffucult style for methodical outfighters. Objectively, he won the trilogy against Ali with a score of 2-1. He also won Young on paper, but this fight could be easily scored otherwise. In any case it was a highly competetive bout, as well as the one against Holmes. Usyk would definitely have problems with Norton and his nightmarish style. It's possible to see this fight going in both ways.
Post Reply