Page 3 of 3

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 20 Jan 2025, 08:02
by evrenb
Mike Tyson

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 26 Jan 2025, 09:07
by Sweet Dick Willie
You could say Tyson wasn't the same going into the Douglas fight

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 30 Jan 2025, 10:52
by JabZudah
Vernon Paris

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 13 Feb 2025, 00:46
by Les Norton
Jeff Fenech.
He totally dominated Nelson only to be screwed over for a draw. He didn’t have the same energy or hunger leading into the rematch and was stopped in 8.
After a layoff he came back and got knocked out by Calvin Grove - a decent fighter but not somebody Fenech should have lost to.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 13 Feb 2025, 17:55
by Expug
Les Norton wrote: 13 Feb 2025, 00:46 Jeff Fenech.
He totally dominated Nelson only to be screwed over for a draw. He didn’t have the same energy or hunger leading into the rematch and was stopped in 8.
After a layoff he came back and got knocked out by Calvin Grove - a decent fighter but not somebody Fenech should have lost to.
Great call. You’re correct. French , I thought was going to be difficult dominant for much longer. The Nelson rematch was really disappointing I thought. Jeff seemed like a different guy

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 14 Feb 2025, 12:55
by robbydecker
Lamar Clarke
Duane Bobick
Gerry Cooney
John Tate
Mike Tyson
Kelly Pavlik
Deontay Wilder
Roy Jones Jr (The Tarver Loss) (Griffin bout/DQ Loss doesn't count, imo)

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 14 Feb 2025, 13:36
by bwu
Pedro Vilella

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 15 Feb 2025, 13:25
by Ambling Alp II
robbydecker wrote: 14 Feb 2025, 12:55 Lamar Clarke
Duane Bobick
Gerry Cooney
John Tate
Mike Tyson
Kelly Pavlik
Deontay Wilder
Roy Jones Jr (The Tarver Loss) (Griffin bout/DQ Loss doesn't count, imo)
Some of these guys (like Bobick and Cooney) were stepping up in class and started fighting much better competition. It's hard to say if they really declined after their first loss or were just losing and not looking so good because their opponents were so much better than they were on their way up.

Tate always seemed like a weird case. He has already shown that he had some ability before the Weaver fight. It looked like he was going to be fighting Holmes in a big unification fight. (Tate was the WBA champ and Holmes the WBC champ.) We would have had one champion and not all the WBA champs that followed. Too bad that didn't happen.
Tate actually looked good for the first 14 rounds of the fight against Weaver.
Then after the Weaver fight, he was actually running away from Berbick in their fight. than he disappeared.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 01 Nov 2025, 17:48
by Caractacus
Joe Louis (he had lost his first fight as an amateur)

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 03 Nov 2025, 02:56
by Scypion
Willie Monroe - I don't know if his loss to Hagler was his first, but it was the beginning of the end of him being a contender.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 07 Nov 2025, 19:59
by semtexreilly
I was about to say Barry Mcguigan, I thought his 1st loss was to Steve Cruz ,but after checking he had an earlier pts loss to Chris Eubank's elder brother Peter, never knew that ,ever day is a school day 😀

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 09 Nov 2025, 08:26
by keithmoonhangover
JackSprocket wrote: 26 Jan 2025, 09:07 You could say Tyson wasn't the same going into the Douglas fight
I don't think he was the same after the Spinks fight, but that's his fault.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 09 Nov 2025, 08:32
by keithmoonhangover
Joe Frazier is a good example, but the big one for me is Foreman. Some boxers have such an invincible mindset, that when they lose, they're never the same again. While the true greats like Ali and Leonard used the loss as fuel to win the rematch.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 09 Nov 2025, 10:02
by Controversial
Scypion wrote: 03 Nov 2025, 02:56 Willie Monroe - I don't know if his loss to Hagler was his first, but it was the beginning of the end of him being a contender.
They fought three times, the first time they fought Monroe was 32-3-1 and Hagler lost. Hagler beat him twice after this.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 09 Nov 2025, 18:55
by Scypion
Ingemar Johansson

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 18 Nov 2025, 07:30
by nickcat0
orbtastic wrote: 13 Dec 2024, 10:00 .........
Trinidad
..........
Is that true, or did he just move up in weight, where his power wasn't as effective?

39-0 at light-middlle
3-3 at middle, but spread over nearly 7 years, with two retirements thrown in.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 18 Nov 2025, 14:39
by gilgamesh
nickcat0 wrote: 18 Nov 2025, 07:30
orbtastic wrote: 13 Dec 2024, 10:00 .........
Trinidad
..........
Is that true, or did he just move up in weight, where his power wasn't as effective?

39-0 at light-middlle
3-3 at middle, but spread over nearly 7 years, with two retirements thrown in.
It was the power thing mainly. He wasn't a skilled enough boxer to be able to outbox most Championship level bigger guys, his punch bailed him out against superior boxers at the lighter weights. It couldn't at Middle.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 18 Nov 2025, 15:39
by Caractacus
Big John Tate

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 19 Nov 2025, 10:36
by bwu
He had some good wins after his first loss, but I don't think Tommy Morrison ever completely recovered from his KO by Ray Mercer.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 19 Nov 2025, 14:36
by mattdonnellon
John Tate is the poster boy for this.

Re: Fighters never the same after their first loss

Posted: 19 Dec 2025, 06:53
by bennie
Jose Baret.