Page 3 of 6

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:24
by Goz
I'm totally fucked.

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:25
by Goz
Sorry, thought that might say 'I'm totally smeged'.

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:25
by Max Molyneux
No stay.

Your bets are nothing to do with the forum.

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:30
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Kevo wrote:Yes! I beat the system!

:box:
fornicate Me (will it be F or Smeg?)

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:31
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
How'd you beat the sytem Kev? Oh I voted for Lirva to stay, yes he was an asshole and an annoying 1 but it adds to the forums flavour, not into banning people, what next and where does it end - someone gets banned for disagreeing with a mod?

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:33
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Foggy wrote:IMAGINE if don't call it a come back & Livra where the same people & trying to pull the wool over everyone eyes :o

OK maybe not, just got abit carried away there.
Exactly what I thought, odd how DCIAC only posts when Lirva posts

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 19:51
by Shirow
Oh, i voted GO.

I really enjoy the fact that i respect almost all opinions on here and like almost all the personalities.

Kick him Ahhhhht!

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 20:08
by states
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Foggy wrote:IMAGINE if don't call it a come back & Livra where the same people & trying to pull the wool over everyone eyes :o

OK maybe not, just got abit carried away there.
Exactly what I thought, odd how DCIAC only posts when Lirva posts
I can't believe that. That would be even lamer than the stituation we already have.

Re: Lirva 33 - should he stay or should he go?

Posted: 02 Feb 2006, 23:00
by lirva33
nickd wrote:i can't believe anyone would want him to stay!
put that in your pipe and smoke it.

now lets delete this rubbish and get on with things in a civillised manner.

I urge my supporters to boycott this thread!

nickd has been made out to be a total prat in this thread. Hopefull this tulip has learned his lesson

Re: Lirva 33 - should he stay or should he go?

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 04:39
by jeej
lirva33 wrote:
nickd wrote:i can't believe anyone would want him to stay!
put that in your pipe and smoke it.

now lets delete this rubbish and get on with things in a civillised manner.

I urge my supporters to boycott this thread!

nickd has been made out to be a total prat in this thread. Hopefull this tulip has learned his lesson
Give it a rest. If you had any self-respect at all you would pay what you owe, apologise and get on with it. I find it quite unbelievable that YOU would suggest we all grow up and just get on with it. YOU are the one in the wrong, just pay up.

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 05:18
by jomothepure
Just a little experiment:

fornicate fornicating fucked fuckadoodledoo

pudendum cunted cunting cuntadoodledoo

While the above may suggest otherwise, I for one am in favour of smartening up the foul language occasionaly used on the forum, so as to protect the five year old girls who may innadvertently click onto boxrec and wonder who Ike Ibeabuchi is. My only request is that 'n' is built in to the programme so that if (heaven forbid) someone calls allegedly 'pudendum' he becomes 'an' pudendum instead of a pudendum.

Re: Lirva 33 - should he stay or should he go?

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 05:38
by nickd
lirva33 wrote:
nickd wrote:i can't believe anyone would want him to stay!
put that in your pipe and smoke it.

now lets delete this rubbish and get on with things in a civillised manner.

I urge my supporters to boycott this thread!

nickd has been made out to be a total prat in this thread. Hopefull this tulip has learned his lesson
I look like a prat? You're the one who has no balls son.

I'm not arsed if they ban you or not just having a bit of a laugh now go and crawl back under your stone you reptile.

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 05:45
by Blue
:roll: Silly little boys who can’t stand dissent. :lol:
I voted he should he stay :TU:
Flame away :box:

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 06:25
by jamesmcdonnell
That's it, Blue should go too....in fact we should ban everyone whose name is a primary colour.

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 06:38
by Blue
:lol:

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 06:50
by Max Molyneux
Max Molyneux wrote:No stay.

Your bets are nothing to do with the forum.
:TU:

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:05
by nickd
jamesmcdonnell wrote:That's it, Blue should go too....in fact we should ban everyone whose name is a primary colour.
Lirva is YELLOW

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:06
by nickd
Max Molyneux wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:No stay.

Your bets are nothing to do with the forum.
:TU:
Why are you agreeing with yourself? :lol: :lol: ;) :P

Re: Lirva 33 - should he stay or should he go?

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:13
by Razor
jeej wrote:
lirva33 wrote:
nickd wrote:i can't believe anyone would want him to stay!
put that in your pipe and smoke it.

now lets delete this rubbish and get on with things in a civillised manner.

I urge my supporters to boycott this thread!

nickd has been made out to be a total prat in this thread. Hopefull this tulip has learned his lesson
Give it a rest. If you had any self-respect at all you would pay what you owe, apologise and get on with it. I find it quite unbelievable that YOU would suggest we all grow up and just get on with it. YOU are the one in the wrong, just pay up.
I agree. :wink:

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:17
by Max Molyneux
nickd wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:No stay.

Your bets are nothing to do with the forum.
:TU:
Why are you agreeing with yourself? :lol: :lol: ;) :P
Well your bets are a personal thing and nothing to do with this forum so he should be banned on that one.

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:21
by nickd
Max Molyneux wrote:
nickd wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: :TU:
Why are you agreeing with yourself? :lol: :lol: ;) :P
Well your bets are a personal thing and nothing to do with this forum so he should be banned on that one.
To a degree, but when Lirva used this forum for months to make the bet, then goad DCIAC about losing 500 quid soon and going on and on about it, and demanding the money... then it changes the whole complexion a little IMO. Anyway keep the fornicator here I dont really care I just cant believe he has the lack of self respect required to stick around after what he's done. End of!

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:29
by J
Max Molyneux wrote:
nickd wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: :TU:
Why are you agreeing with yourself? :lol: :lol: ;) :P
Well your bets are a personal thing and nothing to do with this forum so he should be banned on that one.
BETS ARE TO DO WITH THE FORUM IF THEY ARE DONE ONTHE FORUM AS THIS WAS MAX.

for my mind pay up and stay or welch on it and go.

that way the choice is totally up to Lirva.

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:33
by nickd

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:36
by Max Molyneux
He used to the forum to make the bet but it's more a personal thing between who he made it with not the forum.

Posted: 03 Feb 2006, 07:41
by J
well most dont feel that when you are so cocksureof yourself and use a bet to accentuate your point it aint thats involving folk.

"ill have 500 quid with whoever wants it" thats not personal thats generic.

either way its clear in my mind if lirva shows some class and tries to redemm himself and pays up we should drop it.

if he doesnt he should be hounded of the board.

and dont start sending me pms lirva please, its not necessary otherwise ill post em here and everyone can see your cowardice.