Posted: 30 Mar 2006, 19:03
Ricky took on the responsibility of facing the mandatory when M’Baye stepped aside for the Mausa-Hatton fight.jamesmcdonnell wrote:The difference with Marquez was that he was considered dull as dishwater, and had no fanbase. Had he been a draw then the business with the belts would not have mattered a jot, he could have made fights with Barrera, Morales or Pacquaio even without a belt on the line.Blue wrote:John Dillinger wrote:Makes perfect sense to give up the IBF belt. After Collazo, Ricky has probably got 4 or 5 fights left. If he wins against Collazo, he's got bargaining power at welter. PBF is now at welter, Cotto will be at welter very soon. These are the big moneyand "respect" fights that people want.
If he stays at 140, who is there to compare with PBF or Cotto?Has everyone forgotten what happened to Juan Manuel Marquez?
![]()
Now that Ricky is no longer IBF champion, he’s no longer the WBA "Super" Champion.
So he’s obliged to fight the WBA mandatory;does anybody know who that is??
![]()
I think U guys have seen the last of Hatton at 140![]()
He won't have to face his WBA mandatory for a while, but as you say, this could well be the last time we see him at LW.
Then he claimed since he was now a super champion he had more time to defend his mandatory obligation since
M’baye had to fight the nearest contender for the vacant regular title. (And U guys think your not being conned?)
Now that entire Bull Shit is out the window because Ricky is no longer a super champion.
U are so fickle James,
Pacquiao in the rematch. After appearing on every major English & Spanish speaking network 39 times in the last ten
years; unifying the IBF/WBA tiles and drawing with Pacuiao in a super fight, U don’t think Marquez had no fan base?
Seems like you U bought into another con job by briber Bob as well. Did U got your info about him from your Yank click?