Page 3 of 4
Posted: 10 May 2006, 13:31
by Spud
I have to say you are keeping myself and a few others entertained ...
Yet again a post full of inaccuracies ...
Now please feel free to publish the letter my commanding officer sent to FW ...
Go on I am calling your bluff ... that letter as anyone would tell you in legal language was patronising to say the least and was basically telling Your In House to f*ck off and that no one was going to tell him how his soldiers would behave!!!
So come on publish the letter ... please do!!
Posted: 10 May 2006, 13:36
by boxingchat
silkov wrote:pepsi wrote:
BoxingTwat ...
It is really very amusing how you pick and choose your threads to post on and how your selective reading comes to the fore ...
"Failed Solider" is the one I laughed at most ... as soon as you put it up I received two seperate calls where some typical "squaddie" banter ensued and some very good friends gave me some shit ... so for that well done!!! ... but whilst I do not feel there is any need to justify myself to you ... I look back on my 24 years service in the Army and am extremely proud of my achievements ... you mention FACTs, well I served in one particular unit with the Airborne Forces and earned the right to do so for 2 and a half years ... if that is what is called failure then so beit ... if serving 24 years and attaining the rank of Staff Sergeant is failing then so beit!!!
But lets get onto the main point that I have always had with you and lets go and write about FACTS ...
Why are you so firghtened of naming yourself??
Why are you being what is percieved as a typical internet coward who hides behind his computer screen stating this and that about a variety of boxers and promotional firms yet you fail to name yourself and you fail to subtatniate any of your claims by naming yourself ...
If you did then maybe just maybe some of your claims may have some credence!!!
So is your name really Pepsi?... wheres Shirley???
Suits him too, all gas and farts. Bet he keeps Shirley in a box under his bed with his bycycle pump and he still has to tie her up.
Posted: 10 May 2006, 13:38
by boxingchat
pepsi wrote:
I have to say you are keeping myself and a few others entertained ...
Yet again a post full of inaccuracies ...
Now please feel free to publish the letter my commanding officer sent to FW ...
Go on I am calling your bluff ... that letter as anyone would tell you in legal language was patronising to say the least and was basically telling Your In House to f*ck off and that no one was going to tell him how his soldiers would behave!!!
So come on publish the letter ... please do!!
I might if I can get it. Seems your boss didn't show you the same letter he
actually sent if that's what you think it say's. Did he type one to keep his BOY happy or did you manufacture one for yourself. You're lying again.
Posted: 10 May 2006, 13:43
by silkov
stujones wrote:boxingchat wrote: Most people who get nicknamed Spud are usually misfits and you are no different.
I've got to stand up for my Uni friend Spud Hopkins, he's been called Spud all his life - not really sure why. Bit of a legend.
He shagged a glamour model two weeks back (no he didn't have to pay) - it was quite funny seeing them on the dancefloor at the club was quite funny he stands at about 5 foot 2, and she's was much taller.
But he's got that "Michael J Fox" thing (no not parkinson, but the back to future era) that the women seem to love.
Great laugh aswell.
The glamour model was probably too coked up to know what she was shagging...
Posted: 10 May 2006, 17:34
by Spud
boxingchat wrote:pepsi wrote:
I have to say you are keeping myself and a few others entertained ...
Yet again a post full of inaccuracies ...
Now please feel free to publish the letter my commanding officer sent to FW ...
Go on I am calling your bluff ... that letter as anyone would tell you in legal language was patronising to say the least and was basically telling Your In House to f*ck off and that no one was going to tell him how his soldiers would behave!!!
So come on publish the letter ... please do!!
I might if I can get it. Seems your boss didn't show you the same letter he
actually sent if that's what you think it say's. Did he type one to keep his BOY happy or did you manufacture one for yourself. You're lying again.
Good bluff ... where's the letter??
Theres this thing called data protection!!!
Have no fear I know exactly what was and what wasn't sent ...
Come on Coward ... whats your name?? ... you have made numerous allegations on here about me and other personalities ... have the guts to name yourself ... or are you shitting yourself about the consequences??
Posted: 10 May 2006, 18:27
by hitman_hatton1
spud causing trouble again.
the forum killer is on the warpath.
Posted: 10 May 2006, 20:13
by silkov
pepsi wrote:boxingchat wrote:pepsi wrote:
I have to say you are keeping myself and a few others entertained ...
Yet again a post full of inaccuracies ...
Now please feel free to publish the letter my commanding officer sent to FW ...
Go on I am calling your bluff ... that letter as anyone would tell you in legal language was patronising to say the least and was basically telling Your In House to f*ck off and that no one was going to tell him how his soldiers would behave!!!
So come on publish the letter ... please do!!
I might if I can get it. Seems your boss didn't show you the same letter he
actually sent if that's what you think it say's. Did he type one to keep his BOY happy or did you manufacture one for yourself. You're lying again.
Good bluff ... where's the letter??
Theres this thing called data protection!!!
Have no fear I know exactly what was and what wasn't sent ...
Come on Coward ... whats your name?? ... you have made numerous allegations on here about me and other personalities ... have the guts to name yourself ... or are you shitting yourself about the consequences??
Why dont' you just go back to the dogshite forum if they'll have you, you boring bugger!....
Posted: 11 May 2006, 03:40
by lirva33
silkov wrote:pepsi wrote:boxingchat wrote:
I might if I can get it. Seems your boss didn't show you the same letter he actually sent if that's what you think it say's. Did he type one to keep his BOY happy or did you manufacture one for yourself. You're lying again.
Good bluff ... where's the letter??
Theres this thing called data protection!!!
Have no fear I know exactly what was and what wasn't sent ...
Come on Coward ... whats your name?? ... you have made numerous allegations on here about me and other personalities ... have the guts to name yourself ... or are you shitting yourself about the consequences??
Why dont' you just go back to the dogshite forum if they'll have you, you boring bugger!....
Yeah just F*ck off!!
Clearly NOBODY wants you here you reject.
B-Chat hasn't even pulled out the heavy artillery and he has completely OWNED you in such embarassing fashion.
I would stick my tail between my legs and run for the hills back to ESB if I were you. Oh, you got banned from there. Doghouse then. Oh, you got banned from there too.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 04:09
by jamesmcdonnell
I'm pretty sure neither fight Academy nor Sports Network are going to be publishing letters sent to them from other parties, and without any evidence to back it up, despite this being highly entertaining, it's about as meaningful as two washerwomen hollering insults at one another from over their back garden wall.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 05:59
by numpty
Latest news on Fightnews.com is that it is not sanctioned yet at all!
Saureland[spl] said a deal is far from done!
Posted: 11 May 2006, 06:19
by boxingchat
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'm pretty sure neither fight Academy nor Sports Network are going to be publishing letters sent to them from other parties, and without any evidence to back it up, despite this being highly entertaining, it's about as meaningful as two washerwomen hollering insults at one another from over their back garden wall.
Never say never Jimmy Boy, the letter about Spud is priceless and when it is faxed to me you will all have a laugh on me.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 06:21
by jamesmcdonnell
Well, I am always willing to have a chuckle.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 06:22
by boxingchat
So, three pages in and still I am right. Once again, Spud-u-like has misread a plain and simple letter and FA are still Bullshitting people. No change there then!
Bring on the apologies...one by one, form an orderly queue and cancel all those Cabs and unplug the fat birds mike............Old BC wins again!
Re: Ricky Hatton ... Bout Sanctioned
Posted: 11 May 2006, 06:24
by boxingchat
Posted: 11 May 2006, 08:27
by eatsleepbox99
ready to apologise BC?
I think you would be better off concentrated on your own fighters in case they all start looking at the contracts, that is if you have made sure your best fighters have one!!
I trust all the SN shareholders don't mind paying all yours and Ricky's legal fees?
Posted: 11 May 2006, 10:03
by boxingchat
eatsleepbox99 wrote:ready to apologise BC?
I think you would be better off concentrated on your own fighters in case they all start looking at the contracts, that is if you have made sure your best fighters have one!!
I trust all the SN shareholders don't mind paying all yours and Ricky's legal fees?
What makes you think I give a shit?
Posted: 11 May 2006, 10:04
by boxingchat
As for Legal fees, you can't even pay your own brief's let alone SN's.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 10:11
by josh fg
Whats everyones problem with spud, he posts interesting stuff from time to time and though he is as partisan as boxing chat I dont think thats a means to ban anyone or tell them to fornicate off just take what he says with the occasional pinch of salt. He is a guest on this forum where is everyone's manners.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 13:30
by don't call it a comeback
numpty wrote:Latest news on Fightnews.com is that it is not sanctioned yet at all!
Saureland[spl] said a deal is far from done!
Look I really don't want to get involved in this tedious slanging match but the piece I have just read on Fightnews has Sauerland saying nothing had been signed but an agreement had been reached and something should be signed today.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 13:38
by boxingchat
It will be sanctioned as a $200k bung has just hit Sauerlands Account!
Just awaiting Hatton's personal ink and it's a done deal.
However, what a waste of money as he has to fight Urkal or vacate and he won't want Urkal like he didn't want M'Baye!
Seems alot of money just to rent a title for a few weeks simply to make sure we all, like fools, buy PPV.
Personally, I'm surprised the WBA are suffering this merry-go-round.
Still with Urkal now waiting his turn it looks like we are back to square one.
On the bright-side, with all the money this farce is costing at least they may lay Spud off!
Posted: 11 May 2006, 14:12
by beagleboy
Spud in the S.A.S?
Would his head have fitted through a window in the Iranian embassy?
Posted: 11 May 2006, 14:20
by KO Artist
beagleboy wrote:Spud in the S.A.S?
Would his head have fitted through a window in the Iranian embassy?
They had patio doors at Queens Gate.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 16:13
by Autobarn
you know i would hate that title to go to Urkal, which it probably will if Hatton beats Collazo. in germany they'll act like he's actually a world champion proper.
Posted: 11 May 2006, 18:05
by stujones
viciousmaussa wrote:you know i would hate that title to go to Urkal, which it probably will if Hatton beats Collazo. in germany they'll act like he's actually a world champion proper.
I don't like it also when fighters are proclaimed as champion proper when they are not - but Urkal has been given a bit of a tough time in world title fights - and as such isn't given the recognition he deserves world wide.
I was speaking to a knowledgable American who doesn't get to see much European boxing. We were discussing Urkal and he proclaimed he wasn't world class cause he couldn't beat Harris in his adopted home country. If I hadn't seen either fight also, I would have said he had a point - but Urkal was shafted in the first fight.
Posted: 12 May 2006, 10:31
by eatsleepbox99
boxingchat wrote:It will be sanctioned as a $200k bung has just hit Sauerlands Account!
Just awaiting Hatton's personal ink and it's a done deal.
However, what a waste of money as he has to fight Urkal or vacate and he won't want Urkal like he didn't want M'Baye!
Seems alot of money just to rent a title for a few weeks simply to make sure we all, like fools, buy PPV.
Personally, I'm surprised the WBA are suffering this merry-go-round.
Still with Urkal now waiting his turn it looks like we are back to square one.
On the bright-side, with all the money this farce is costing at least they may lay Spud off!
where do you get this nonsense from?
no monies gone anywhere and Ricky will not be signing anything.... a bit like the contract your boss reckons he had with him!!!!
I hope you do a better job when you are polishing Frank's car!