Posted: 27 Jul 2006, 07:49
Hide bowled over lots of clubfighters and over the hill guys but he never KO'd anyone decent. He was carefully matched. In his 2 challenging fights he was beyond pathetic.
It probably felt harder to Tony because he was shot to shit.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I find it extremely hard to believe that Herbie hit Harder than Lennox Lewis and Mike Tyson.
Wouldn't his best win of been against Tony Tuckerstujones wrote:Most overated multiple champion in boxing history.
A British champion
A WBC International champion (when that belt was a little harder to come by)
A two time WBO champion.......................
His best win was against Michael Bentt.
He didn't even fight a particularly decent British fighter for the vacant British title. He fought one of the worse (no disrespect) claimants to a world heavyweight title ever for his first WBO reign. Lost it in defence number 1. Then somehow got a chance to fight for vacant title (by beating on guys with losing records) vs an old junkie who looked sleepy throughout his UK stay that week.
He then defended against I would say the worst fighters to be sanctioned by a leading governing body... these made Tocker Pudwill and Kid Fire McIntyre resemble Ali. Then he lost it to Klitchsko.
Maybe overated isn't the correct word, cause he was undoubtedly talented. I would say most PROTECTED champion ever right from the begining.
.
Maybe Hides speed would be all wrong for Ruiz, Ruiz isn't a murderous puncherSyntax Error wrote:Agreed, I couldn't see Hide beating Ruiz, the style is all wrong for him.Riddick Blowe wrote:lol. Personally I couldn't see Herbie stoically taking repeated power shots for 12 rounds and fighting back...Syntax Error wrote: Hide would have starched Jones Jr.
RJj would have been quick enough to run away from Hide, but he wouldn't have had the power to trouble him at heavyweight.
You have to ask yourself, would Herbie have beaten Ruiz? Could he have coped with the pressure, the roughhousing, the fact that ruiz wouldn't just fold when hit? Herbie never demonstrated that he was capable of beating a top 10 heavyweight.
I think Herbie would need to do the proving in this matchup. Ruiz has proved he can hang tough and beat top 10 opposition, Herbie hasn't got close to that.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Maybe Hides speed would be all wrong for Ruiz, Ruiz isn't a murderous puncherSyntax Error wrote:Agreed, I couldn't see Hide beating Ruiz, the style is all wrong for him.Riddick Blowe wrote: lol. Personally I couldn't see Herbie stoically taking repeated power shots for 12 rounds and fighting back...
You have to ask yourself, would Herbie have beaten Ruiz? Could he have coped with the pressure, the roughhousing, the fact that ruiz wouldn't just fold when hit? Herbie never demonstrated that he was capable of beating a top 10 heavyweight.
HA!jamesmcdonnell wrote:I was going to say that. Tucker was reportedly shot to smeg when Lewis beat him, let alone when Hide got hold of a clapped out and drug raddled version.
You often hear fighters who get annihilated embarrasingly say things like that "Wow, that guy has got to be the biggest puncher in the division," because it's easier to say that than,
"boy, I'm really shot to pieces, this guy stinks, and I would have probably given him a whipping 5 years ago, but I think it's clear based on tonight's performance that I've got nothing left to offer ths sport except for a series of demeaning and low paid gigs on the clubfighting circuit culiminating in me muttering to myself and urinating on my pants in a dimly lit room in some shitarse part of town."
If you look at comparable opponents to other top guys Hide beat them allot quicker.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hmm, I reckon Golota hit a lot harder than Herbie personally, I've always thought Herbie's power rather overrated, I mean, who did he actually beat that indicates his terrifying punch power?
yes but on his day Tucker was fantastic, even a shot Tucker is a good win, and to take him out in 2 is very good. Look what other fighters performed like with Tucker. A year later he took Ruiz the 11jamesmcdonnell wrote:As said before, Tucker was an old wrecked drug addict by 1997.
Well it was close.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Wouldn't his best win of been against Tony Tuckerstujones wrote:Most overated multiple champion in boxing history.
A British champion
A WBC International champion (when that belt was a little harder to come by)
A two time WBO champion.......................
His best win was against Michael Bentt.
He didn't even fight a particularly decent British fighter for the vacant British title. He fought one of the worse (no disrespect) claimants to a world heavyweight title ever for his first WBO reign. Lost it in defence number 1. Then somehow got a chance to fight for vacant title (by beating on guys with losing records) vs an old junkie who looked sleepy throughout his UK stay that week.
He then defended against I would say the worst fighters to be sanctioned by a leading governing body... these made Tocker Pudwill and Kid Fire McIntyre resemble Ali. Then he lost it to Klitchsko.
Maybe overated isn't the correct word, cause he was undoubtedly talented. I would say most PROTECTED champion ever right from the begining.
.