Jerry Quarry Vastly Underated

BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Seamus wrote:Quarry beat Lyle fairly early in his career, and Garcia did the same to Norton. Lyle got better, and Norton destroyed Garcia in the rematch. The 73 Quarry was a formidable opponent, but the Norton who beat Ali and took Holmes to a split decision would be too strong in my opinion.
lyle was 19-0 when he fought jerry quarry. i think quarry beat a prime lyle. lyles prime was 1973-76. quarry deserves full credit for beating lyle.


garcia beat norton in 1970. nortons prime was 1973-78. quarry beat lyle in his prime years......garcia did not beat norton in his prime years.



why the 1973 quarry? why not the 1968 quarry who beat floyd patterson??


IMHO the peak jerry quarry was the late 1960s jerry
kick asner
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 692
Joined: 02 Oct 2005, 00:01

Post by kick asner »

I would'nt call it nut hugging for Norton. Really this thread is not about Norton and I don't see anyone trying to turn it into one. Norton just happend to be an opponent of Quarry's who beat him soundly by a fifth round stoppage. So it leaves the question what did Quarry have left at that point. That is a somewhat tough call and maybe Quarry himself was the only one to know the answer. No one has denied that he looked soft or out of shape but others have made the point he put himself in that position. Part of the fight game is to get yourself prepared, so if his preperation was lacking than he should have planned better. It's not like you can go back and put an asterus next to Norton's victory and say it does'nt count because Quarry was ill prepared to take this fight.

But getting back to the original topic Quarry had some good wins was a notch below the greats, and lost or drew to some non greats. With all of that said I don't see the name Quarry as synonomous with greatness and just by the fact he is being talked about in a forum like this means he has not totally been forgotten so he was at least recognized as an important fighter of his era. With that kind of recognition it would be hard to say he is underated.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

quarry beat a prime/near prime floy patterson a top 20 heavyweight of all time.


quarry beat 3 top 40 heavyweights of all time all at/near there best patterson, lyle, shavers
evndrbsn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 757
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 13:20

Post by evndrbsn »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:quarry beat a prime/near prime floy patterson a top 20 heavyweight of all time.


quarry beat 3 top 40 heavyweights of all time all at/near there best patterson, lyle, shavers
Quarry got an undeserving draw and a controversial decision over Patterson. Stop wording it where it sounds like Quarry actually "beat" Patterson.

In those two fights, Patterson showed everyone but the judges that he was the better heavyweight and history recognizes that.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

quarry-patterson II fight could have gone either way. it was very close therefore quarry deserves credit for victory



i agree floyd is better........but quarry is very underated. quarry is a top 25 heavyweight of all time. he would knock out ken norton if he had been in his prime.
evndrbsn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 757
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 13:20

Post by evndrbsn »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:quarry-patterson II fight could have gone either way. it was very close therefore quarry deserves credit for victory



i agree floyd is better........but quarry is very underated. quarry is a top 25 heavyweight of all time. he would knock out ken norton if he had been in his prime.
I doubt it. He would have given a better performance, but Norton was more durable than you give him credit for. Only the elite punchers KO'd Norton quickly in his prime. Quarry was a good fighter but not an elite puncher. Norton was also way too accurate a puncher for Quarry. Same result, different round. Quarry's better conditioning makes it a little more competitive for a little longer before Norton wears him down with crunching shots. Norton TKO 8.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Only the elite punchers KO'd Norton quickly in his prime.
norton only fought one elite puncher in his prime. he avoided punchers like a plague. even eddie futch said norton freezes up vs punchers. quarry was a hard puncher and a great finisher.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

Hey Brock you sippin sauce again? By my count it's at least 2.....Foreman and Shavers....werent they both "premier" punchers? Yep and he folded like and accordian both times.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Ken Norton stop a prime jerry quarry? a prime quarry was incredily hard to stop(unless cuts).....he had a granite chin. only all time punchers can stop a peak jerry quarry., no way lighthitting kenny norton stops jerry quarry. norton is not a power puncher. he never knocked out a contender except the horribly overhyped duane bobick. u overate nortons punching abilities.


quarry at his peak is too much for norton. even a washed up fat quarry fought very well the first 3 rounds vs norton because he completley ran out of gas. imagine if that was a prime quarry who was faster, more mobile, better reflexes, and IN SHAPE would have done to kenny. ken norton couldnt fight off the backfoot. quarry would force norton back.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

BoxBuzz wrote:Hey Brock you sippin sauce again? By my count it's at least 2.....Foreman and Shavers....werent they both "premier" punchers? Yep and he folded like and accordian both times.

norton was not in his prime vs shavers
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

fair enough......but he did the same accordian act
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Post by Ambling Alp »

Ken Norton certainly wasn't "light hitting". It's doubtful that even his worst detractors would say that.
Besides stopping Bobick and Quarry, he also stopped Henry Clark, a fringe contender who had a good chin.
Ali was respectful of his power, unlike Quarry whose punches didn't have the slightest affect on him.
Norton also hurt Holmes a few times in their fight and Holmes had a great chin.

Quarry wasn't a particularly big puncher. He stopped less than half of his opponents in his career. The chances of him stopping Norton (who was only stopped by Foreman in his prime) are very slim.
Quarry was stopped 6 times in his prime. It's not surprising at all that Norton would stop him.
Quarry being 29 years old is relevant. A heavyweight that is only 29 is still a young man. This isn't a gray area.
Quarry wasn't a last minute substitution; and Norton barely had more time than Quarry did.
Norton stopping Quarry in 5 rounds isn't really that suprisingly against a fighter that was inferior to him and didn't have the weapons to beat him.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17090
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Post by Seamus »

How's this Brockton. If they fight anytime between 1967-72 Quarry wins. After 72 it's Norton.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

Ambling Alp wrote:Quarry wasn't a last minute substitution; and Norton barely had more time than Quarry did.
But Norton was planning on fighting on that date, while Quarry wasn’t. That’s a big difference. As you noted, Quarry fought about 30 days prior to this fight, but most likely wasn’t planning on fighting again so may have never set foot into a gym until he signed for the Norton fight. Do you think Quarry physically looked as good against Norton as he did in other fights that he did not take on short notice? I think most who have seen this fight would say he appeared to be soft and in much poorer shape than in his other fights.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

wut kept jerry quarry from reaching greatness was muhammad ali and joe frazier. two fighters who quarry just simply couldnt beat on his best day and didnt match up well against. two great fighters. however that doesnt mean quarry was great......cause i feel on his best day he could have beaten any other fighters of that era. george foreman blatantley and even admitted that he ducked jerry quarry, he wanted no part of jerry quarry. foreman was a guy who quarry matched up well against. here was a guy who quarry should have gotten to prove his greatness against.....but foreman ducked quarry.


ken norton simply did not match up well vs punchers who made norton fight off the back foot. i used to think norton would beat a prime quarry until i watched some quarry films and realized how great jerry was.....and i realized how norton did not match up well vs certain styles. even eddie futch said norton couldnt handle punchers. ken nortons camp avoided the hard punchers of that era and made sure norton fought guys he matched up well against (holmes, ali young all light hitting boxers). quarry is an underated boxer. he had a lot of skills. quarry was also a tiger like finisher when he had his man hurt. quarry was strong and very aggresive. norton doesnt have the firepower to threaten quarry. quarry would dominate norton on the inside. norton had a vunerable chin vs punchers. quarry had the power to knockout norton make no mistake about it. quarry would make norton fight off the back foot which norton was not good at.






Quarry was stopped 6 times in his prime. It's not surprising at all that Norton would stop him.

this is plain out nonsense boxrec hunting. u must look at the circumstances.......


- ali fights were stopped on cuts

- frazier I was on cuts

- chuvalo was a bullshit knockout and if u saw the fight you would know wut i was talking about. quarry could have got up at the count at 2....but he went back down to 1 knee to take a 9 count(Smartly) and he lost track of the count and got up to late. but he was fine......he was dominating chuvalo and would have got up to win a wide decision.

. A long left found Jerry’s temple and caused him to check and dither for a moment before he fell back and sat down. It didn’t seem too big a deal. Embarrassed by the sudden turn of events, Jerry got straight up but then took a knee to clear his head and buy some seconds. His action seemed to be a matter of choice rather than necessity, but then everything went wrong. As the crowd roared and referee Zach Clayton picked up the count, Quarry’s attention became scrambled. Before he knew it, the train he needed to jump on had sped through the station. He still had one knee on the canvas as the count reached ten. Out!

Nobody could believe it. Not the crowd, not Quarry, and probably not even George Chuvalo. In his dressing room, Jerry raged at what he believed to be an injustice. “Nobody knocks me out,” he insisted. “I was looking at the clock and I couldn’t hear the count because the crowd was yelling so much. I got gypped. I got ruined. That destroyed me. I could have gotten up. I couldn’t tell the count by his (Clayton’s) fingers.”



- the ken norton knockout happened when quarry was past his prime, late sub, and out of shape and soft(207lb).


- the frazier II knockout was legit but i think quarry was past it in this fight. watch frazier-quarry I and then frazier-quarry II. joe fraizer and jerry quarry look much faster and better in the first fight than in the 2nd fight. so if your talking about a prime jerry quarry.......he was only ever knocked out by george chuvalo in a very controversial ending.


quarry had a granite chin. norton does not have the power to knockout a prime jerry quarry. his only chance to stop jerry quarry would be by cuts. quarry took flush punches without going down by huge punchers mac foster, ron lyle, earnie shavers, joe frazier I, floyd patterson, etc etc.



norton may have had size......but quarry dealt with the bigger men better.





Quarry being 29 years old is relevant. A heavyweight that is only 29 is still a young man. This isn't a gray area.
Quarry wasn't a last minute substitution; and Norton barely had more time than Quarry did.
every fighter AGES differently.....

ur man riddick bowe was only 28 when he got the shit kicked out of him by andrew golota. however both you and i know that bowe was nowhere near his best anymore when he fought golota. its the same with jerry quarry when he fought norton.


jerry quarry was on his way out when he fought norton. he was retiring when he fought norton. quarry was very battle worn, had slowed down in speed and his reflexes by 1975. quarry took the fight on short notice and showed up out of shape and looked soft. he completley ran out of gas in 3 rounds.


it doesnt take a rocket scientist to realize that was not the vintage jerry quarry in there vs norton.




Norton stopping Quarry in 5 rounds isn't really that suprisingly against a fighter that was inferior to him and didn't have the weapons to beat him.

ill take the prime quarry to stop norton in about 5-7 rounds
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Do you think Quarry physically looked as good against Norton as he did in other fights that he did not take on short notice? I think most who have seen this fight would say he appeared to be soft and in much poorer shape than in his other fights.
its very clear. quarry came in overweight 207lb and looked soft and he gassed early.
evndrbsn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 757
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 13:20

Post by evndrbsn »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:wut kept jerry quarry from reaching greatness was muhammad ali and joe frazier. two fighters who quarry just simply couldnt beat on his best day and didnt match up well against. two great fighters. however that doesnt mean quarry was great......cause i feel on his best day he could have beaten any other fighters of that era. george foreman blatantley and even admitted that he ducked jerry quarry, he wanted no part of jerry quarry. foreman was a guy who quarry matched up well against. here was a guy who quarry should have gotten to prove his greatness against.....but foreman ducked quarry.

Quarry was stopped 6 times in his prime. It's not surprising at all that Norton would stop him.

this is plain out nonsense boxrec hunting. u must look at the circumstances.......


- ali fights were stopped on cuts

- frazier I was on cuts

- chuvalo was a bullshit knockout and if u saw the fight you would know wut i was talking about. quarry could have got up at the count at 2....but he went back down to 1 knee to take a 9 count(Smartly) and he lost track of the count and got up to late. but he was fine......he was dominating chuvalo and would have got up to win a wide decision.

. A long left found Jerry’s temple and caused him to check and dither for a moment before he fell back and sat down. It didn’t seem too big a deal. Embarrassed by the sudden turn of events, Jerry got straight up but then took a knee to clear his head and buy some seconds. His action seemed to be a matter of choice rather than necessity, but then everything went wrong. As the crowd roared and referee Zach Clayton picked up the count, Quarry’s attention became scrambled. Before he knew it, the train he needed to jump on had sped through the station. He still had one knee on the canvas as the count reached ten. Out!
Firstly, I agree, Quarry is not an ATG. Secondly, only the first Ali fight was stopped on cuts. The second Ali fight was stopped because Quarry was getting teed off on. It was stopped in the 7th at Ali's urging when he staggered Quarry. Lastly, how is the Chuvalo fight bullshit? Chuvalo knocked him down fair and square. Quarry screwed up on the count, his fault. Anyway, if he got up, who is to say Chuvalo wouldn't have caught him with another shot? Aaron Pryor lost the same way.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

jerry quarry was up immediate and then went to a knee to take a 9 count. he was fine. it was very bullshit and controversial.


my mistake.......i confused one of the ali fights.....ur right he did stop him the 2nd time.



george foreman ducked jerry quarry. foreman does not match up well vs quarry. he would have had a real handful with quarry. too bad this fight didnt get made. quarry could have really enhanced his legacy. he may have upset foreman
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

norton is defintley not an ATG. quarry matches up better vs a wide variety of styles than norton does.
evndrbsn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 757
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 13:20

Post by evndrbsn »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:jerry quarry was up immediate and then went to a knee to take a 9 count. he was fine. it was very bullshit and controversial.


my mistake.......i confused one of the ali fights.....ur right he did stop him the 2nd time.



george foreman ducked jerry quarry. foreman does not match up well vs quarry. he would have had a real handful with quarry. too bad this fight didnt get made. quarry could have really enhanced his legacy. he may have upset foreman
If Quarry wasn't hurt, why would he take a knee for a "9" count? Must have dazed him enough not to get up at six or so. This makes me think he was more hurt than he let on afterwards and maybe Chuvalo could have finished him off. Who knows? Chuvalo got the KO victory anyways.

Foreman did not duck Quarry. Foreman talks a lot of crap, like several other posters said. There is no way he ducked Quarry but took on Frazier, Norton, Ali, and Young. Frazier was a faster, stronger version of Quarry with better boxing skills. Norton broke Ali's jaw and was only stopped when he was inexperienced by Garcia, which he later avenged. Ali? Lets not even go there. Foreman didn't duck Ali but he ducked Quarry? Ha. Jimmy Young was a masterful boxer, George knew this but still didn't refuse to fight Young.

Quarry was a good fighter, not an ATG and not underrated in the least. He has become very overrated over time.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

If Quarry wasn't hurt, why would he take a knee for a "9" count?

"take the full count. you cant get up fast enough the crowd dont know u was down." - jack blackburn

quarry tooks blackburns advice wisely......but it came back to bite him in the ass!



some fighters are fine after they get knocked down, but choose to take the 9 count because its smart to do(hurt or unhurt) and gives you a chance to catch your breath.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

foreman blantley ducked jerry quarry. all the evidence is there. after quarry demolished murderous puncher shavers in one round.....forget it foreman wanted no part of him. foreman even admitted he ducked quarry.


- foreman had to fight frazier.....frazier was champion!!!!



foreman wouldnt fight quarry pre title......and wouldnt fight quarry when he was champion.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:norton is defintley not an ATG. quarry matches up better vs a wide variety of styles than norton does.
Except that Quarry threw slow, telegraphed punches. :TU:
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

The Great John L wrote:
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:norton is defintley not an ATG. quarry matches up better vs a wide variety of styles than norton does.
Except that Quarry threw slow, telegraphed punches. :TU:



no that was rocky marciano. max baer was DAZZZLING compared to rocky marciano.
evndrbsn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 757
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 13:20

Post by evndrbsn »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:foreman blantley ducked jerry quarry. all the evidence is there. after quarry demolished murderous puncher shavers in one round.....forget it foreman wanted no part of him. foreman even admitted he ducked quarry.


- foreman had to fight frazier.....frazier was champion!!!!



foreman wouldnt fight quarry pre title......and wouldnt fight quarry when he was champion.
Nope, you are right. Foreman went on to defend against weaker, less deserving fighters than Quarry such as Norton and Ali. Good point :TU:
Post Reply