Page 3 of 3
Posted: 08 May 2007, 11:26
by REAL_DEAL
All this suing talk
, Mayweather took got all my money
Re: Ricky Hatton dropped by Sky
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:01
by WelshDevil
The Blade wrote:I hear whispers that Sky have blown out Ricky .. asking too much money etc for the Castillo fight (which he might lose, but that's another story) and he has done a deal with Setanta. PPV with Beeb on delay - probably a week later.
Another great career move, maybe. Except we poor sods won't see it live unless we splash out on yet another channel.
I suppose you can just watch it on live stream or download a few hours later.
Any confirmation on the story yet?
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:04
by REAL_DEAL
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:08
by boxingchat
At 4-5am in the morning one thinks a PPV deal is not sound business for the Boxer ratings wise or money-wise.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:09
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Err KNOW it isn't mate.
It's no-one as in nobody.
Not know-one as in knowledge.
Tut tut. If you're going to correct people's spelling and grammer, make sure you've got it right first.
Wait - is he talking about him not knowing anything or him being a nobody? I thought he was talking about him not knowing anything
Boxingchat enlightens us is Ant unknowledgable or a nobody in yoru opinion?
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:14
by leforge
The undercard is not very good Woods v Gonzalez 2. I read here on this message board Hatton was owed money from previous fights has he been paid? This is the last fight in the HBO deal so if Hatton loses what will he do next?
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:20
by jamesmcdonnell
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:Err KNOW it isn't mate.
It's no-one as in nobody.
Not know-one as in knowledge.
Tut tut. If you're going to correct people's spelling and grammer, make sure you've got it right first.
Wait - is he talking about him not knowing anything or him being a nobody? I thought he was talking about him not knowing anything
Boxingchat enlightens us is Ant unknowledgable or a nobody in yoru opinion?
That depends on whether Ant is agreeing with him or not.
As for my correction, whoops, was looking at the beginning of the sentence, not the end.
Moral is, if you are going to correct someone for incorrectly correcting someone else, then make sure you're own correction is not itself incorrect.
Posted: 08 May 2007, 12:42
by WelshDevil
Thanks Real_Deal
I don't have Sky and I don't have Setanta so Live Stream for me I suppose.