Page 3 of 3
Posted: 18 Oct 2007, 15:57
by lvlarc
Autobarn wrote:then again, if they really want to beat up Sellers so badly, they could always make it a non title bout.
I'm trying to see the underlying reason behind this. Sellers doesn't bring credibility to Enzo. Maybe Sellers pissed Warren off once? Maybe Enzo's ppl want a big paper win i.e. Sellers beat Thompson who beat Haye.
Good point, no doubt Warren & Co will use that line plenty of times down the road, still it's a sorry excuse for a world title defence but enough of the negativity...
Let's hope for good odds on Enzo inside 3 rounds.
Posted: 19 Oct 2007, 06:04
by Autobarn
right now he should be going after o'neil bell at the very least. bell is on the slide and despite being tough has no technical ability...these are the matches we should be getting.
Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 12:33
by Abbo
EddieShredder wrote:Abbo wrote:No response from Simon Block
To be fair to the guy, he's probably only been at work for 15mins or so since the weekend, presuming you sent the email on friday afternoon.
As important a matter as this is, it is a monday morning, so for the first hour of the day, he's probably staring blankly out of the window, drinking tea, reading the pages of the nuts or zoo weekly websites, and updating his facebook
Fair play to Simon Block, they responded very quickly to my mail, and have been true to code.
Nice to see the BBBC returning to its high integrity best.
Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 12:59
by EddieShredder
Abbo wrote:EddieShredder wrote:Abbo wrote:No response from Simon Block
To be fair to the guy, he's probably only been at work for 15mins or so since the weekend, presuming you sent the email on friday afternoon.
As important a matter as this is, it is a monday morning, so for the first hour of the day, he's probably staring blankly out of the window, drinking tea, reading the pages of the nuts or zoo weekly websites, and updating his facebook
Fair play to Simon Block, they responded very quickly to my mail, and have been true to code.
Nice to see the BBBC returning to its high integrity best.
Just seen an article on the BBC saying the BBBofC refused it, and Simon Block outlining pretty much what everyone on here has said
Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 13:04
by Abbo
It also reads like he got the WBO to straighten out re Sellars too.
Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 13:05
by jomothepure
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7060118.stm
If the WBO agreed with the board why the fornicate did they put him in the rankings?
Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 13:10
by Coco
Abbo wrote:EddieShredder wrote:Abbo wrote:No response from Simon Block
To be fair to the guy, he's probably only been at work for 15mins or so since the weekend, presuming you sent the email on friday afternoon.
As important a matter as this is, it is a monday morning, so for the first hour of the day, he's probably staring blankly out of the window, drinking tea, reading the pages of the nuts or zoo weekly websites, and updating his facebook
Fair play to Simon Block, they responded very quickly to my mail, and have been true to code.
Nice to see the BBBC returning to its high integrity best.
You have made a rod for your own back now!
As the new people's champion, we now expect you to apply the same pressure with the same success when this happens again
Good job tho mate