Page 3 of 3

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 13:28
by ebeneezer
Autobarn wrote:I think Froch raises his performance to the opposition. We've seen similar holes in Kelly Pavlik's defense but he's gone on to do big things. Regardless of how KP's career goes, he's won the middleweight crown.
Froch makes Pavlik look Willie Pep defense wise.

And you managed to type Pavlik without "white puncher" after it. Congratulations.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 14:02
by dbf
Couple of things I like about Froch, his undoubtedone punch power, some of the punches he threw last night were really spiteful. I also like the fact he doesn't drain a lot if anything to make weight (by his own admission) yet he still looks big and strong for a supermiddle.

The warning signs about Reids conviction were there from as early as the ring entrance. He didn't look particulary focussed and seemed to play up to the camera by going a little crazy on his walk.

I instantly thought that if his mind was on the job he would have that mean and concentrated look about him. Perhaps I'm reading too much into this.

Froch is frustrating to watch at times and I wish he would keep his guard up. I worry about his work rate though and think he may come unstuck at a higher level.

His reach will pose problems for most super middles in my opinon.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 14:37
by steve689
Achybreaky wrote:Granted tatesovyan beat markussen fair and square in denmark
Not so sure on that, from what i remember Markussen was in control when Tatevosyan knocked him down and the Dane went into total regression and didn't want it anymore. Basically quit.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 14:59
by stujones
steve689 wrote:
Achybreaky wrote:Granted tatesovyan beat markussen fair and square in denmark
Not so sure on that, from what i remember Markussen was in control when Tatevosyan knocked him down and the Dane went into total regression and didn't want it anymore. Basically quit.
So a fair win.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:03
by classboxer
I think Froch is good you know,i believe the top fighters are ducking Froch
(no doubt)

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:07
by steve689
stujones wrote:
steve689 wrote:
Achybreaky wrote:Granted tatesovyan beat markussen fair and square in denmark
Not so sure on that, from what i remember Markussen was in control when Tatevosyan knocked him down and the Dane went into total regression and didn't want it anymore. Basically quit.
So a fair win.
Yes i suppose it was a fair win. Markussen is a bit of a headcase though, not sure if he is always in the frame of mind.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:07
by classboxer
I dont blame Calzaghe for not wanting to fight Froch


(i dont think Bute will be to keen as well)

shame that

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:07
by nickd
classboxer wrote:I think Froch is good you know,i believe the top fighters are ducking Froch
(no doubt)
How on earth are they ducking him? Froch has been fighting at British title level! He hasn't beaten a top 10 opponent as yet.

No doubt????

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:10
by classboxer
nickd wrote:How on earth are they ducking him? Froch has been fighting at British title level! He hasn't beaten a top 10 opponent as yet.
Froch said that he would be a tougher fight for Calzaghe than Hopkins
(a fool would disagree)


Froch like him or hate him is being avoided by top fighters

No doubt

(Bute is scared of froch i know that for a fact)

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:12
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
nickd wrote:
classboxer wrote:I think Froch is good you know,i believe the top fighters are ducking Froch
(no doubt)
How on earth are they ducking him? Froch has been fighting at British title level! He hasn't beaten a top 10 opponent as yet.

No doubt????
Are Magee and Reid that far off the top 10 though? I think Froch probably loses to Calazage in a toughish fight. He might beat a fair few other top players though

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:21
by nickd
classboxer wrote:
nickd wrote:How on earth are they ducking him? Froch has been fighting at British title level! He hasn't beaten a top 10 opponent as yet.
Froch said that he would be a tougher fight for Calzaghe than Hopkins
(a fool would disagree)


Froch like him or hate him is being avoided by top fighters

No doubt

(Bute is scared of froch i know that for a fact)
Froch a tougher fight than Hopkins? I don't think so. Hopkins would hand Froch his arse on a plate.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:34
by classboxer
Hopkins is an old man,the ring magazine P4P ratings are a joke


Froch,none of the top dogs in Supermiddleweight want to get in the ring with Froch

I hope Froch has the management to give a payday to tempt Bute ,Calzaghe in to the ring,lets be honest its going to take BIG MONEYS for Bute or Calzaghe to get in the ring with Froch

some fighters are ducked,Froch is 30 now,tick tock


IN boxing there are boxers that NEVER get the respect they deserve Froch needs to stay busy or he will end up one of them

No doubt

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:41
by Autobarn
so Murray took some shots. Hickman threw more punches at Murray than any of John's previous foes (at least the fights I saw). He was bound to take a few more than usual. He was also granted the chance to land way more. Let's give the kid a chance.

Murray actually keeps his opponent off balance by forcing the fight. When they're off balance they can't land their best shots.

Look, I've seen JL Castillo, Humberto Soto, all the terrific upright Mexicans keeping their chins too high but they use nasty, educated pressure to keep their opponent's punches mimimised on the back foot and learn to block/parry shots.

Judging by Murray's style, he seems to study guys like these. Offensively, he's great. If he can keep that chin down, guard tight and add a bit more head movement (& you see him try out head movement most fights if not stikc to it) there will be few problems.

I think John can beat Thaxton and go on to take down Romanov when the time is right. If he faces Romanov, we'll know all about his chin/defense!

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:53
by tony3
Loftgroov wrote:
Kilburn wrote:It makes me laugh. All the arrogance we have to put up with from American fighters / fans, and we're still so quick to turn on one of our own.
I agree.

It's all too bloody typical of England sports fans unfortunately. If we have someone decent to get behind, who is cocky, exciting to watch and a potential world beater then it's time to start moaning about them, hoping they get beat, and "hoping they go away"....

Who cares if he is arrogant??? You only have to watch him box - not get married to the guy.

If Froch was some plucky loser, with 3 losses on his record I suppose everyone would love him.

I expect these are the same people who cheer on Tim Henman at Wimbledon each year....
Well Froch has at least got people talking about him and that's a good start.

If I'm completely honest, I alway reguard a new talent with sceptisism and an irrational fear that somehow their presence will diminish the prestige of the established figures.

It took me a long while to warm to Joe Calzaghe and I was mortified when he beat Chris Eubank for the vacant WBO title.

Here we are a boxing generation later, and I'm doing exactly the same thing to Carl Froch.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 15:58
by Kilburn
For all the talk there still is about Hopkins, he had 2 goes at beating Jermain Taylor and couldn't do it.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 16:22
by MightyWarrior
LOVE to see Froch/Brahmer - similar fighters, both have the big punch and a nasty attitude in there.

Would be a fantastic fight, Carl should maybe take the money and chance in Germany, as they will bid big if a vacant title comes up.

Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 16:23
by nickd
classboxer wrote:Hopkins is an old man,the ring magazine P4P ratings are a joke


Froch,none of the top dogs in Supermiddleweight want to get in the ring with Froch

I hope Froch has the management to give a payday to tempt Bute ,Calzaghe in to the ring,lets be honest its going to take BIG MONEYS for Bute or Calzaghe to get in the ring with Froch

some fighters are ducked,Froch is 30 now,tick tock


IN boxing there are boxers that NEVER get the respect they deserve Froch needs to stay busy or he will end up one of them

No doubt
Froch is not being ducked - what a load of shit. They haven't even tried to get his European title shot yet let alone a world title shot.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:16
by WildWaylon
nickd wrote:
classboxer wrote:Hopkins is an old man,the ring magazine P4P ratings are a joke


Froch,none of the top dogs in Supermiddleweight want to get in the ring with Froch

I hope Froch has the management to give a payday to tempt Bute ,Calzaghe in to the ring,lets be honest its going to take BIG MONEYS for Bute or Calzaghe to get in the ring with Froch

some fighters are ducked,Froch is 30 now,tick tock


IN boxing there are boxers that NEVER get the respect they deserve Froch needs to stay busy or he will end up one of them

No doubt
Froch is not being ducked - what a load of shit. They haven't even tried to get his European title shot yet let alone a world title shot.
At the moment there are no grounds for saying Froch is a world class fighter - He hasnt reached that level yet, so he and his supporters are jumping the gun a bit - As for the top men ducking him, thats just nonsense - He will undoubtably get his chance to fight for a title soon and then we will see if the world class label is applicable - OK he beat Reid, but the fight did him no favours at all IMO - I thought his previous fight was better using his defense far more than he did against Reid - The power shots come from the legs which means he is a bit flat footed - The low left leaves him wide open to a straight right - The top men will exploit these things - No way will he win four world titles like Joe has - He overrates himself and people on here are doing the same.