Page 3 of 3

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 04:43
by Peter Hick
I'm starting to think that Hatton always knew Mayweather was too good for him.

Therefore the only reason he fought him and wants to fight him again is money.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 12:39
by DG.
Dioufy wrote:He is a bully in the ring, I think everyone would agree on that. Although I need proof to believe that Hatton "wasn't ready" for Mayweather after he fought Kostya.

Ask his dad.

Funny how they dd not mention it in his 'book'!

Hatton only wants the return for the cash, he has no chance at all!

NONE!

:lol:

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 13:46
by Dioufy
Find me a link to say Hatton said he wasn't ready for Floyd after he beat Kostya.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 14:11
by Asterix
mimmy123 wrote:just read a thread about why Brits do not like certain kinds of boxer.

We hated Eubank
We do not rate Calzaghe
We moan about Khan

we hate boxers but love them when they are seriously injured or lose, or go nuts and do crazy things.

What are we looking for in the UK. Are we looking for a heavyweight version of Nigel Benn, or a tougher Frank Bruno, or maybe another Bruce Woodcock?

For me I am looking for a guy who comes through the ranks with no glitz or mouth, a guy who comes in the ring to a basic anthem does the buisness and its greatful for the fight. Maybe a British version of Evander Holyfield.
Great topic, Mimmy.

RE: We do not rate Calzaghe
I think the general boxing fan does rate Calzaghe. When someone like Barry McGuigan goes on record as saying that Joe is the best Super Middleweight Britain's ever produced then it does filter through to the viewers. It seems to me that Calzaghe receives most of his critique on this forum.

RE: We moan about Khan
I think, perhaps, people don't like Khan talking about his ambitions when he isn't making the steps to achieve them. Khan would be more respected with a Cotto-like attitude, but then he wouldn't stay in the media. I think to appreciate what he says you have to bear in mind that a lot of it is just for publicity. A public front is not necessarily the true face. I think Khan is very much loved in the Asian community, but I could be wrong.

David Haye, at the moment, seems to be pushing the right buttons.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 15:19
by DG.
Dioufy wrote:Find me a link to say Hatton said he wasn't ready for Floyd after he beat Kostya.



Accept it,we all know Hatton turned it down!


:lol:

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 15:24
by states
As he fought him eventually, I can't see how it makes much difference.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 15:57
by Dioufy
DG. wrote:
Dioufy wrote:Find me a link to say Hatton said he wasn't ready for Floyd after he beat Kostya.



Accept it,we all know Hatton turned it down!


:lol:
And when did I dispute that then? I didn't, I disputed that Hatton turned him down and said he "wasn't ready" after he beat Kostya.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:10
by WildWaylon
DG. wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:What type of boxer is Britain looking for? Well considering he drew 50 odd thousand for a fight with a mid level fighter last weekend, Ricky Hatton


Just ignore the whinging old womens act you get from these clowns on this forum, its completely unrepresentative of the real thoughts of boxing fans

Yes, thats exactly what we need.. Another fighter who fights a load of old shot lighter fighters and denies us arguably the biggest fight in British boxing history while maintaing he is one of the lads. :lol:


What we need are fighters like David Haye who REALLY want to fight the best and just want to prove themselves.


:TU:
Yes, thats exactly what we need.. Another fighter who fights a load of old shot lighter fighters and denies us arguably the biggest fight in British boxing history while maintaing he is one of the lads.
Give us a clue DG, who is this fighter you mention without a name LOL.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:13
by harrygreb
we really do not need a good thread like this ruined by the pointless hatton huggers and haters. youve f----ed this thread you morons

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:22
by WildWaylon
Dioufy wrote:
DG. wrote:
Dioufy wrote:Find me a link to say Hatton said he wasn't ready for Floyd after he beat Kostya.



Accept it,we all know Hatton turned it down!


:lol:
And when did I dispute that then? I didn't, I disputed that Hatton turned him down and said he "wasn't ready" after he beat Kostya.
TBH I think after beating Kostya, Hatton thought he could beat anyone. I really cant see Hatton saying he "wasnt ready". Even now after being KOd by Floyd he still thinks he could beat him.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:42
by WildWaylon
We do of course want to see young British fighters come through and become World champions. If you have any pride in our Nation its natural to want our lads to win the ultimate prizes. We also want to see great fighters whatever their nationality excite us such as Ali and Tyson. I must admit I prefer humble fighters who just get on with the job and win their fights, to big heads who mouth off about how good they are, Carl Froch springs to mind.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:46
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Dioufy wrote:He is a bully in the ring, I think everyone would agree on that. Although I need proof to believe that Hatton "wasn't ready" for Mayweather after he fought Kostya.
He said as much in 2005, you could argue, he was building up the fight by building his rep, but it seemed like the fight was out of grasp in 2007 after he turned it down many times

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:48
by Dioufy
I want definitive proof that Hatton said he wasn't ready after he beat Kostya - that's all I am arguing about now. It you can't provide that proof then don't come in this thread with assumptions or hearsay and think that you know what happened.

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 02 Jun 2008, 16:52
by DG.
WildWaylon wrote:
DG. wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:What type of boxer is Britain looking for? Well considering he drew 50 odd thousand for a fight with a mid level fighter last weekend, Ricky Hatton


Just ignore the whinging old womens act you get from these clowns on this forum, its completely unrepresentative of the real thoughts of boxing fans

Yes, thats exactly what we need.. Another fighter who fights a load of old shot lighter fighters and denies us arguably the biggest fight in British boxing history while maintaing he is one of the lads. :lol:


What we need are fighters like David Haye who REALLY want to fight the best and just want to prove themselves.


:TU:
Yes, thats exactly what we need.. Another fighter who fights a load of old shot lighter fighters and denies us arguably the biggest fight in British boxing history while maintaing he is one of the lads.
Give us a clue DG, who is this fighter you mention without a name LOL.


I will give you a few clues Mr Waylon.


1) Its not a tickling contest.

2) Me drinks beer

3) I called Judah 'Juuddah'

4) £14.95 PPV daylight robbery, at least Dick Turpin wore a mask.

5) Me makes numerous pathetic excuses not to fight Witter.

6) Me likkle bruddah Maffhew is always on me undercrakers...er - I mean Undercards!

7) I am WWE with 8 -10oz gloves!

8) Did I tell you me drinks beer?

TicklinnnnnnnnG!


:lol:

Re: What kind of boxer are we looking for....???

Posted: 05 Jun 2008, 07:32
by Roper
Another Nigel Benn would be great, as well as Chris Eubank.